Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
These all speak of yearning to me, for what might have been. Something deep and sensual and a knowing that one is denied.These pull at my heart strings. Achingly sad, crushingly painful, and compel me to drown in them. I wonder what it is about these images. Perhaps its the way the spaces these figures inhabit drown them, or that they seem to be mere fleeting presences as they disappear from our sight. I see myself in them, in their ghostly, almost somnambulic restlessness.
View attachment 2559496
View attachment 2559497
View attachment 2559498
View attachment 2559499
View attachment 2559501
View attachment 2559502
View attachment 2559503
View attachment 2559504
These thoughts and definitely these images cause pure burning to feel, touch, taste down to the heart and soul.I think the eye prefers curves to straight lines. But we live in cities of straight lines, such a tyrannical regime of lines that brooks no resistance. So, when we see curvilinear forms, we give it a name - Eroticism
I hope you don't shed too many tears...Ah, youāve made me cry! Itās not just the ache of what was but the promise, hope and anticipation that she brought. Oh what it is to lose that! Gosh, you hit a nerve.![]()
I've been reading Alison weir's brilliant account of the the war of the Roses, and I had already known that Margarate of Anjou was quite a important figure of that war, but she, it now appears to me, was so instrumental. It was at her behest, married to an ineffectual henry VI, who or may not have been the father of Edward, her son, who was to be, but never was the next kind (having been killed by Richard of Gloucester, later Richard III), and her many men who swarmed around her, doing her bidding. These men wasted countless innocent lives, ruined a whole kingdom for the love of one woman bent on destroying the Yorkists.If this is seen not just in terms of desire, but also dominance and ownership, this seems like such responsibility! To bear the weight of feeling responsible for war, indirectly for it may not be her who schemes, or that she is so beautiful as to be an object, or symbol of power, and seen as the glorious prize! This reminds me of invasion, besiegement, greed & bloodshed. To abduct the most beautiful woman in the world would be to capture the greatest treasure! Though I donāt see Helen as passive and powerless⦠Iām sure she took advantage of her power. But in other fables I can imagine the woman as completely objectified.
But perhaps not all beauty is innocent, wasnāt it Lady Macbeth who questioned manhood to the point of murder? Despite the harm, thereās something erotic about being so completely obsessed with a womanās beauty as to be manipulated to her will.
Many men will go to any lengths to to satiate the hunger caused by obsession, love or seduction.
View attachment 2559740
View attachment 2559742
View attachment 2559743
View attachment 2559744
View attachment 2559745
Beautiful images! Are you the model? I especially love the way the light and shadow take so many forms in Image No. 5 (great legs and ass, by the way). Yes, light embraces form.I evoke light again, because I never cease to enjoy its many gifts. Light brings the new day, and my bodyās place in its vicissitudes, its contours, its manifestations. Light casts visions of simple pleasures, like the shimmering wing of a bird in flight, or the silhouette of a longed for moment of comfort, or joy.
Light is a kiss, an embrace, a curtain unveiled, a knife slicing open my heart to reveal my need, soft, insistent.
I hate to disappoint, but no!Are you the model?
Those .. arenāt you.I hate to disappoint, but no!
What is confusing about those images not being of me? I am confused...Those .. arenāt you.
I think heās confused
??
They are you ??What is confusing about those images not being of me? I am confused...
I give up...They are you ??
Then⦠you should be a model
Heās right !
Your query confused meI give up...
They're not...But you said...oh never mind!Your query confused me
I havenāt thought anything youāve posted was you !
Itās 1:00amThey're not...But you said...oh never mind!this is so confusing!
Go.to.sleeeeeeep!Itās 1:00am
My bad
I evoke light again, because I never cease to enjoy its many gifts. Light brings the new day, and my bodyās place in its vicissitudes, its contours, its manifestations. Light casts visions of simple pleasures, like the shimmering wing of a bird in flight, or the silhouette of a longed for moment of comfort, or joy.
Light is a kiss, an embrace, a curtain unveiled, a knife slicing open my heart to reveal my need, soft, insistent.Is there a relationship between āclassā and eroticism?
Hi! Well.. Iāll have a go.So, I think there is a difference between Eroticism and pure sexuality. While the sexual can also be erotic, the erotic is often not necessarily sexual.
George Battaile said once that eroticism as thriving when it breaks prohibitions, goes beyond the physical, into something else, something we canāt express but feel. Perhaps, he is referring to o something similar to what the Romantics called the sublime.
So this thread is about the erotic, moving away from the sexual to something being it, something more sublime.
Hopefully we can work out what eroticism actually is.
Her are some imagesView attachment 2557864View attachment 2557865View attachment 2557866