Durham Investigating The Clinton Campaign

[ll74]

I'm just saying this was a very coordinated effort and the more and more the public finds out about the things that I've seen that remain classified, they'll be more and more appalled by those efforts in 2016."

Here is the entire bullshit in a nutshell. If you read this without all the fluff.....he's basically saying that the findings will add political clout....not indictments.

At this point, you're delusional enough to believe that when the indictments don't come, it will be because of the "deep state" not because there is a lack of evidence.

It's the same shit the left spews about Trump not being indicted and the same shit that the right spewed about Clinton's emails. Indictments are difficult to pursue...as they should be. And unethical behavior is not necessarily illegal.

 

[Rightguide]

Here is the entire bullshit in a nutshell. If you read this without all the fluff.....he's basically saying that the findings will add political clout....not indictments.

At this point, you're delusional enough to believe that when the indictments don't come, it will be because of the "deep state" not because there is a lack of evidence.

It's the same shit the left spews about Trump not being indicted and the same shit that the right spewed about Clinton's emails. Indictments are difficult to pursue...as they should be. And unethical behavior is not necessarily illegal.

You don't know what you're reading.

 

[pecksniff]

You don't know what you're reading.

Enough to know that nothing will come of this that will vindicate the RW counter-narrative regarding the Russia collusion.

 

[ll74]

You don't know what you're reading.

Lol...you get a hardon for just a headline that references Durham.

Just like your hard on for AZ audits, nothing will happen and you'll move onto the next excitement.

They call that edging

 

[coati]

Oh gosh, if Durham comes up with anything on the Clinton campaign, she might not be able to run again.

Whatever shall we do?

 

[Rightguide]

Enough to know that nothing will come of this that will vindicate the RW counter-narrative regarding the Russia collusion.

The left-wing narrative on Russian collusion has already been debunked as a projection of their own acts of collusion.

 

[Rightguide]

Lol...you get a hardon for just a headline that references Durham.

Just like your hard on for AZ audits, nothing will happen and you'll move onto the next excitement.

They call that edging

I was right on the subject of the present Durham investigation in 2017 and after.

 

[ll74]

I was right on the subject of the present Durham investigation in 2017 and after.

The one where there is precisely one indictment.....yes

 

[pecksniff]

The left-wing narrative on Russian collusion has already been debunked as a projection of their own acts of collusion.

Not yet, it hasn't, and it won't be by Durham.

 

[Rightguide]

Well the Sussman trial is underway. It's day 2 and and Scott Hellman, currently an FBI supervisory special agent leading a team investigating cybercrime has testified they knew the alleged Trump Russian collusion bank connection was false within days.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...-bureau-rejected-alfa-bank-claims-within-days

I will note now that the majority of the jurors are Democrats, many working for the government, and three are Hillary donors.

 

[ll74]

Well the Sussman trial is underway. It's day 2 and and Scott Hellman, currently an FBI supervisory special agent leading a team investigating cybercrime has testified they knew the alleged Trump Russian collusion bank connection was false within days.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...-bureau-rejected-alfa-bank-claims-within-days

I will note now that the majority of the jurors are Democrats, many working for the government, and three are Hillary donors.

Of course you will bring up the jurors...so when they rule against Durham, you can play the victim again.

 

[Rightguide]

Of course you will bring up the jurors...so when they rule against Durham, you can play the victim again.

The American people will be the victim if they rule on prejudice instead of on the evidence and the law. One woman a Hillary Donor started out saying she wasn't sure she could be fair and had to be talked into saying she could by the judge who reminded her that Hillary wasn't on trial and neither was Donald Trump. Durham's team decided to leave her in.

 

[pecksniff]

We're not getting one step closer to anything that might either incriminate Clinton's campaign or exonerate Trump's.

 

[ll74]

The American people will be the victim if they rule on prejudice instead of on the evidence and the law. One woman a Hillary Donor started out saying she wasn't sure she could be fair and had to be talked into saying she could by the judge who reminded her that Hillary wasn't on trial and neither was Donald Trump. Durham's team decided to leave her in.

Yes...I get that you're already playing the victim.

 

[Rightguide]

Yes...I get that you're already playing the victim.

You don't "get" anything. You have a lot of delusions of grandeur which of course is a symptom.

 

[ll74]

You don't "get" anything. You have a lot of delusions of grandeur which of course is a symptom.

You're literally already preparing everyone by saying the court is rigged in so many words.

 

[pecksniff]

The American people will be the victim if they rule on prejudice instead of on the evidence and the law. One woman a Hillary Donor started out saying she wasn't sure she could be fair and had to be talked into saying she could by the judge who reminded her that Hillary wasn't on trial and neither was Donald Trump. Durham's team decided to leave her in.

That's the DC jury pool. If it's good enough for Durham it should be good enough for you.

 

[icanhelp1]

You don't "get" anything. You have a lot of delusions of grandeur which of course is a symptom.

The swamp creatures are already shitting all over this trial. The judge’s wife is Lisa Page’s lawyer. The judge himself is a close confidant of Eric Holder, the Jury is tainted with pro Clinton donors. The judge has already limited evidence , this judge is a Sullivan clone, how’d that work out.

 

[pecksniff]

The swamp creatures are already shitting all over this trial.

The swamp creatures are in the Hamptons and Wall Street, not in DC.

 

[ll74]

The swamp creatures are already shitting all over this trial. The judge’s wife is Lisa Page’s lawyer. The judge himself is a close confidant of Eric Holder, the Jury is tainted with pro Clinton donors. The judge has already limited evidence , this judge is a Sullivan clone, how’d that work out.

Yes, you don't have any faith in your evidence and so you're preparing to have the out you want when the case is lost. Well done.

 

[Rightguide]

Robby Mook, Hillary's campaign manager, just testified in the Sussman trial that Hillary Clinton personally approved sharing the false Alfa-Bank claims about Trump with the media.

 

[ll74]

So Sussman didn't lie.

Got it.

 

[Rightguide]

You're literally already preparing everyone by saying the court is rigged in so many words.

I'm not saying that at all. All I have said is what I have posted which is the truth.

The swamp creatures are already shitting all over this trial. The judge’s wife is Lisa Page’s lawyer. The judge himself is a close confidant of Eric Holder, the Jury is tainted with pro Clinton donors. The judge has already limited evidence , this judge is a Sullivan clone, how’d that work out.

It worked out as planned in DC which even the DOJ will tell you is the hardest place to get a fair trial for Republicans or their policies and programs. The Democrat jury pool population is over 90%.

 

[ll74]

I'm not saying that at all. All I have said is what I have posted which is the truth.

It worked out as planned in DC which even the DOJ will tell you is the hardest place to get a fair trial for Republicans or their policies and programs. The Democrat jury pool population is over 90%.

Bullshit...it's exactly what you are prepping for...on purpose....you know you're going to lose

 

[pecksniff]

We're not getting one step closer to anything that might either incriminate Clinton's campaign or exonerate Trump's.