Dr. John Gartner on a tale of two brains: "Biden's brain is aging. Trump's brain is dementing"
- Thread starter adrina
- Start date
Do you think the MAGAts can even identify the multiple times where the demented orange traitor fucked up in that clip???
I guarantee they can’t…
adrina
Heretic
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2017
- Posts
- 25,430
Doubt it. Most won't even bother to listen.Do you think the MAGAts can even identify the multiple times where the demented orange traitor fucked up in that clip???
I guarantee they can’t…
Nailed it!!!
The "people / everybody" wanted it (referring to the overturning of Roe, etc,) is the most ridiculous / obvious lying and gaslighting ever.
It puts the RWCJ lying and gaslighting we see here on the PB on a daily basis to shame.
adrina
Heretic
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2017
- Posts
- 25,430
Nailed it!!!
The "people / everybody" wanted it (referring to the overturning of Roe, etc,) is the most ridiculous / obvious lying and gaslighting ever.
It puts the RWCJ lying and gaslighting we see here on the PB on a daily basis to shame.
And his utter and complete commitment to it shows just how bad off he is. Not only is he delusional but he actually believes his delusions.
Who knows what delusions the demented orange criminal ACTUALLY believes…
I mean, this IS a demented criminal we’re talking about,..
That ^ is spot on.
Dude definitively destroys / debunks dementia Don’s delusional diatribes.
Dayum!!!
adrina
Heretic
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2017
- Posts
- 25,430
That ^ is spot on.
Dude definitively destroys / debunks dementia Don’s delusional diatribes.
Dayum!!!
I'm very impressed with some of the younger YT news/politics commentators.
The information is standard political pundit pulp, but the presentation and editing by some of these younger YT commentators makes it incredibly appealing / accessible / digestible / palatable.
Highest marks.
adrina
Heretic
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2017
- Posts
- 25,430
The information is standard political pundit pulp, but the presentation and editing by some of these younger YT commentators makes it incredibly appealing / accessible / digestible / palatable.
Highest marks.
Additionally they are reporting it as is.
I like the term Meidas Touch uses - legacy media. And I believe they, along with some of their associates, are very correct that the legacy media is doing a disservice to news these days. It's driven by ad revenue and clicks. So we see a horse race and the repeated narrative about Biden's age. Or the crazy sound clips from various politicians who ought to be questioned on the spot, instead of being treated as if what they are saying or doing is normal.
RobDownSouth
BoycotDivestSanctio
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2002
- Posts
- 78,472
"Lawfare and weaponization of the criminal justice system blah blah blah"
My question is, did Trump lift that from Rightguide?
Or did Rightguide lift that from Trump?
My question is, did Trump lift that from Rightguide?
Or did Rightguide lift that from Trump?
dmallord
Humble Hobbit
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2020
- Posts
- 5,337
Best guess ... Rightguide lifted it from Trump. Trump isn't prone to reading things as intellectually challenging as Righty posts here.
I see value in legacy media, if only for their infrastructure, gravitas, relationships with Washington insiders, and respect for national security - to a point. They also "listen to both sides", (give airtime to both sides) which serves the purpose of reassuring people that their voices are being heard; which has value, imho.
Also:
The Avant-garde / online media (I would include Wikileaks) have proven to be less than perfect in their own way.
Also:
Meidas, etc, are also chasing revenue and clicks to some extent:
Now obviously, Meidas, etc don’t have the overhead of the larger legacy media outlets, so they don’t require as much patronage, and thus, can probably afford to speak a bit more freely: I like that in your face irreverent news commentary as a supplement for legacy media, but not a replacement..
Finally:
I would actually mourn the passing of legacy media institutions like the PBS News Hour, Meet The Press, Face The Nation, etc. - everything except FOX "news" and their ilk.
And I would also mourn the passing of The Meidas Touch, etc, if they ceased operations.
adrina
Heretic
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2017
- Posts
- 25,430
I see value in legacy media, if only for their infrastructure, gravitas, relationships with Washington insiders, and respect for national security - to a point. They also "listen to both sides", (give airtime to both sides) which serves the purpose of reassuring people that their voices are being heard; which has value, imho.
Also:
The Avant-garde / online media (I would include Wikileaks) have proven to be less than perfect in their own way.
Also:
Meidas, etc, are also chasing revenue and clicks to some extent:
Now obviously, Meidas, etc don’t have the overhead of the larger legacy media outlets, so they don’t require as much patronage, and thus, can probably afford to speak a bit more freely: I like that in your face irreverent news commentary as a supplement for legacy media, but not a replacement..
Finally:
I would actually mourn the passing of legacy media institutions like the PBS News Hour, Meet The Press, Face The Nation, etc. - everything except FOX "news" and their ilk.
And I would also mourn the passing of The Meidas Touch, etc, if they ceased operations.
I don't dismiss legacy media - I still look at ABC, CNN, Newsweek, The Hill, MSN, PBS - even BBC etc. However I find that they are more wrapped up in the presentation of normalcy. The YT outlets like Meidas, Luke Beasley, Adam Mockler, The Bulwark etc aren't married to the presentation of normalcy. One of the most frustrating things to me when looking at legacy media is the absolute commitment to bothsidesism - giving equal footing to the legitimate and to the insane to maintain an image of fairness. It is as meaningful as Fox's "fair and balanced" trope.
When I look at the old style media - what the legacy media was before mass consumption/commercialization/news as a product - I see MT et al as being far more in that spirit. Yes they need money to operate, and yes they even have "commercial breaks" in their shows. (Side note, reminds me of The Burns & Allen Show for how commercials were back in the stone age.) I would consider them more of a small business than a corporate empire however. But when a spade is a spade, you are more likely to hear it called by MT et al than legacy media - where likely they'll be searching for some formulaic point/counterpoint and in doing so end up giving legitimacy to the illegitimate.
I'm not tossing out the baby with the bath water, but we have to be honest about our legacy media. Their goal is less about informing the public and more about making money.
