Dolcett Girls

[Quint]

.............

 

[@}-}rebecca----]

You know censorship...violence is downright American, but nooooo sex! Nuh uh no way no how!

Considering the origins of the image I would suspect the blurring is bokashi as a result of the Obscenity Article in the Japanese Penal Code.

"any person who distributes, sells or publicly displays an obscene writing, picture or other materials shall be punished with penal servitude for not more than two years. The same shall apply to any person who possesses the same with the intention of selling it.

It's still as an ambiguous law as at the time it was written, that which constitutes obscenity was not well defined. Interpretation lead to ""refers to that which unnecessarily excites or stimulates sexual desire, injures the normal sense of embarrassment commonly present in a normal ordinary person, and runs counter to the good moral concept pertaining to sexual matters.".

Deeper into the topic you will find a minefield of actions and examples based on introductions of differing genres over history intertwined with judicial intervention across a broad spectrum. Including contention over defining artistic merit is mitigated right through to examples of litigation contesting whether penalties violated freedom of expression guaranteed in the Japanese Constitution.

Taking a simplistic stance it's amusing. Particularly so when I consider the art of Shunga as a form of comparison.

​

click to resize image

Initial observation is that the Artist intended representation of the phallus to be large as a physical trait. The reality is it's a form of artistic 'zoom'. Permits the viewer to see more detail of the genitals and thus increase the propensity of arousal . Delicious irony.

 

[RJMasters]

Considering the origins of the image I would suspect the blurring is bokashi as a result of the Obscenity Article in the Japanese Penal Code.

"any person who distributes, sells or publicly displays an obscene writing, picture or other materials shall be punished with penal servitude for not more than two years. The same shall apply to any person who possesses the same with the intention of selling it.

It's still as an ambiguous law as at the time it was written, that which constitutes obscenity was not well defined. Interpretation lead to ""refers to that which unnecessarily excites or stimulates sexual desire, injures the normal sense of embarrassment commonly present in a normal ordinary person, and runs counter to the good moral concept pertaining to sexual matters.".

Deeper into the topic you will find a minefield of actions and examples based on introductions of differing genres over history intertwined with judicial intervention across abroad spectrum. Including contention over defining artistic merit is mitigated right through to examples of litigation contesting whether penalties violated freedom of expression guaranteed in the Japanese Constitution.

Taking a simplistic stance it's amusing. Particularly so when I consider the art of Shunga as a form of comparison.

​

click to resize image

Initial observation is that the Artist intended representation of the phallus to be large as a physical trait. The reality is it's a form of artistic 'zoom'. Permits the viewer to see more details of the genitals and thus increase the propensity of arousal . Delicious irony.

So the one Japanese prisoner says to the other....I was thrown in here because I killed a person...what are you in for?

"Brushing of the genitals"

Sometimes I really crack myself up...lol.

 

[snowy ciara]

In my art handling days I worked for a gallery that dealt Vallejo and I got to party backstage with him and his wife/model Julie. Total BDSM pervs. She's a submissive bodybuilder and he's like her old gnarly daddy/coach/master figure.

I'm glad I looked this thread up for _AEA_; I hadn't actually read the whole thing before. I checked out some of the links from earlier in the thread and it's really not my cup of cocoa...

But Mr. Rathbone's commentary on the situation with Vallejo sounds interesting....

 

[_AEA_]

Now things are much clearer...

Glad I joined this site...always learning more...and Dolcett girls sound absolutely splendid. It's almost romantic how much they give of themselves.

 

[SinfulSailor]

Deep Bump

I notice you bumped this thread back in '07 so I'm giving you an '08 bump.

One of the things I like about Dolcett girls is precisely what the writer describes on the necrobabes site:

"Dolcett is a generous and dedicated artist. He likes to concentrate on the thoughts/feelings of the central character as she is snuffed, and his favorite theme is the "willing victim." "

There are a many reasons I am attracted to the willing victim concept. Some, but not all, are:

I like women. Thankfully, my observations of and experiences with societally instilled female machinations (let him chase you until you catch him) and (carrot and stick (like from Meat Loaf) I'm denying the pussy until you swear you'll "love me till the end of time") - and at the other end of the spectrum - incessant and unrelenting feminism-required oneupmanship power conflict have not at all soured me on the more tender gender.

(That was a horribly constructed sentence. My seventh grade English teacher (wow she was good!) would be very disappointed. (Would she take back her "A"? haha) Nevertheless I hope it adequately conveys the concept.)

Soooo, anyway, like Dolcett I am also focused on, intrigued by, enamored of, etc., "the thoughts/feelings of" my "central character"/possession/property (pyl). While there is a place in my sadism to love shock, dismay, even terror, I find that a willing, pliable and enthusiastic pyl can be taken to those places quite well enough should that suit me. I'd rather not start there and live there.

Also, while I have often been called a Viking born out of time (fair enough I suppose, both psychologically and genetically) I am intelligent enough to understand that the time of the Viking has come and gone. The literal stealing, enslavement and subjugation of women seen as manly, complimented, rewarded and embraced by the society of that period is no longer a practical option should one value one's freedom. (ahhh for the days of yesteryear)

So, like Dolcett, I love a "willing victim". Especially, a willing victim unencumbered by currently espoused bdsm dogma, ie., limits, negotiation, etc., ad nauseam. In short, a woman who will do anything, be anything, endure anything to please. Wow. A rare bird indeed.

Actually, when a man like me understands (as I do) how rare and valuable and treasurable (coined that word) a woman like that is - then it becomes apparent that it would be the height of folly to actually snuff that woman. So, in my view, the most extreme end would never actually happen. (shhhhh don't tell her I said that!) But to hold property like that - that is wealth indeed. Warren Buffett and Bill Gates are paupers indeed by comparison. So I would be even less likely to destroy that property than Buffett or Gates is likely to in one fell swoop give away every asset they own or control and walk into the streets a penniless and homeless destitute.

In fact, I love a limitlessly willing victim so much, and am so aware of her worth that I am unwilling to settle for less.

So anyway...... lest I ramble on forever here.....

Here's your bump.

Oh yeah. PS:

It seems like every time some subject like this comes up there are people talking about "mindless, automatons, no choice, doormats, no brain". I note that Dolcett and I share a preference for the thoughtful and intelligent. One of Dolcett's stories was even about a grad student's thesis. Love it.

Now here's your bump.

 

[SOO MILES]

Is anyone into Dolcett girls, or identify as one? It seems it is not as rare as it once was, and we have come across one or two online who profess to be very committed to the most extreme ends of it. Not sure I would be willing to go that far, lol pretty sure I wouldn't actually, but the genre which has evolved from Dolcett art and grown to include some other artists is both intriguing and an aphrodesiac when in the right mindset and mood to enjoy it. I imagine it is not favourably viewed by everyone, but there does seem to be a huge following within the BDSM community, though many will not openly admit it. Does it repulse or turn you on, or is it something that does neither? Is there more to consider than it being a subculture within the lifestyle? Would you date someone who was a fan?

Catalina

I was with another girl one weekend and she started talking about Dolcett girls. I got totally creeped out and never called her again. This doesn't exactly answer your quesiton, but you can get the idea of how that sort of thing struck me at the time.

 

[curiousbuttaken]

I am interested in this if anyone wants to RP

 

[Stella_Omega]

Those images come close to pinging my fantasy life but... not quite.

Of course my knee jerks when I hear some male talking about females who are happy to be.. spitted through the intestines and roasted and eaten in this case.

Speak for your very own self, dude. You want to BE a happily cannibalised woman, that's on you. Don't be sublimating that shit.

There's been a lot of it going around lately.

 

[meisieslagter]

Hi Cat, I am into Dolcett. I have been into Dolcett since I was a teenager. It is the total submission that turns me on. When I have sex, it is the fantasy of cutting the girl's throat so she can bleed to death in order for me to then slaughter her, that turns me on. If only the girls I have had sex with over the years had known it ha!

The fact is that once this door has been opened in your mind, nothing else will ever supplant it as it taps directly into our primal sexuality. So this is the ultimate addictive drug, always giving the ultimate orgasm. And there are so many girls out there who are just perfect for slaughter!

But it has to remain fantasy... however Dolcett roleplay, now that is something else, I could not get married to a girl who is not into it, this is the only thing that always guarantees good sex no matter how long you are married.

Or what?

 

[meisieslagter]

RP? Mail me please.