DOJ Steps Into California Lockdown Order

[Pookie]

No, actually I'm an expert at unveiling and showcasing your ineptitude and lack of understanding of just about everything. I'm highly successful as well at revealing your angry pettiness.

^^^ Has me on his buddy list ^^^

 

[bestone4ever]

No, actually I'm an expert at unveiling and showcasing your ineptitude and lack of understanding of just about everything. I'm highly successful as well at revealing your angry pettiness.

Through all your successes and accomplishments, you choose to regurgitate right wing conspiracies all day on a porn site. Mission accomplished! Fucking loser.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

What ever happened to States Rights ??

 

[FlowersForFun]

What ever happened to States Rights ??

They don't include violating the other constitutionally protected rights of their citizens.

Awwwww don't be so sad, you can always move to some other place where the political party that pushes your sort of politics gets to murder the opposition on an industrial scale.

Like China, CCP = good comrades!!!!!

 

[HisArpy]

The DOJ now issues legal opinions by way of "suggestion?" Never had the misfortune to receive communication from the BATF or the IRS, have you?

It is "strongly suggested" that you pay your taxes and not traffic illegally in guns. Otherwise the government will have zumi & pookie send you a "warning".

FWIW, I believe it's a death threat. That's not to say it's a realistic death threat, but it is a death threat none the less. As such, it violates forum rules.

 

[FlowersForFun]

Which one of those applies to the OP, BotTard?

OP wasn't being discussed, maybe you should read up and get a grasp on the conversation before you say something dumb while calling others 'tard'.

Throwing rocks from glass houses and all.....

 

[bestone4ever]

OP wasn't being discussed, maybe you should read up and get a grasp on the conversation before you say something dumb while calling others 'tard'.

Throwing rocks from glass houses and all.....

What the fuck do you think is being discussed? God damn, you're exhausting.

 

[HisArpy]

What the fuck do you think is being discussed? God damn, you're exhausting.

It STARTED as a "discussion". Then you and the rest of the usual suspects showed up.

 

[Conager]

What the fuck do you think is being discussed? God damn, you're exhausting.

Perhaps you should take a nap.

 

[FlowersForFun]

What the fuck do you think is being discussed? God damn, you're exhausting.

A post that isn't the OP.

If you read the discussion you would know that and be all caught up with the class now wouldn't you?

But you don't read, so now you're the clown again.
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/aodPzXtxp4w/hqdefault.jpg

 

[bestone4ever]

It STARTED as a "discussion". Then you and the rest of the usual suspects showed up.

You're right, we showed up to prove that it wasn't a warning.

Perhaps you should take a nap.

Perhaps you should shut the fuck up.

A post that isn't the OP.

The entire thread is about the faux warning. Learn to read, tard.

 

[FlowersForFun]

The entire thread is about the faux warning. Learn to read, tard.

It's related, but not directly about.

Clearly.

You'd know that if you could read.

 

[bestone4ever]

Galloping Gavin, racing down the backstretch of the California Totalitarian Derby pulled up short by jockey Bill Barr Justice:


Barr Justice Department warns Gavin Newsom that ban places 'unfair burden' on California churches
by Nicholas Rowan
May 20, 2020 09:46 AM

"Simply put, there is no pandemic exception to the U.S. Constitution and its Bill of Rights,"

"This facially discriminates against religious exercise," he said. "California has not shown why interactions in offices and studios of the entertainment industry, and in-person operations to facilitate nonessential ecommerce, are included on the list as being allowed with social distancing where telework is not practical, while gatherings with social distancing for purposes of religious worship are forbidden, regardless of whether remote worship is practical or not."

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...n-places-unfair-burden-on-california-churches

Where is the "warning?"

"I'm going to Say Something and then put it out there so that some desperate conservative schmuck online will give it a superficial look-over and think I'm flexing muscles or something."

probably that.

https://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxpj6grFIe1qcaomb.gif

So, no warning was given yet here you two nitwits are attacking me instead of your bullshit source.

If only there was a way that could highlight the part that you keep missing...

Thanks for using big red letters to prove that you were lying and have no idea what a FUCKING WARNING is.

That's not a "warning," Matlock. That's a statement.

This is a warning:

https://media.giphy.com/media/Cc74glR0ahiww/giphy.gif

get it? Hellooooo? McFly?

No that's a threat. Threats are the bastian of those that do not provide consequences after a warning.

A warning is corrective. A warning is enlightening. "You are on the wrong path" should be sufficient warning.

That's not a threat either, snowflake. Grow up.

Fact: that was definitively a threat.


https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/threat


Also a FACT: Rotadom is wrong again.

Which one of those applies to the OP, BotTard?

There was no threat and you damn sure are not anyone's intellectual superior.

That wasn't directed towards anyone here, that was posted as an example, you benighted bucket-brained balustrade of brobdingnagian buffoonery!

https://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxpj6grFIe1qcaomb.gif

There was an implied threat, and you've demonstrated over and over again your intellectual inferiority and pronounced learning disability.

Actually, he gave you an example of a "warning". Not surprising you fucked that up too.

Zumi: "What you quited is not a threat. Here is an example of what a threat looks like."

Rightguide: "OHMIGOD THE EVIL LEFTIE MADE A THREEEEEEAT!"

Anyone who gets a letter from the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ containing the following "Simply put, there is no pandemic exception to the U.S. Constitution and its Bill of Rights," "This facially discriminates against religious exercise," and doesn't conclude he's been given a warning of illegality, is too dumb to be in public service.

The fact that several here are too dumb to see it is of no real consequence to the eventual outcome if the behavior continues. It is an indictment of the education establishments they must have dropped out of.

He "gave" me nothing. The implied threat was directed elsewhere. Pay attention.

Why the difficulty with understanding this?

A "warning" is "don't."

A "threat" is "or else."

Do you all routinely stoop to threats when a simple warning would suffice?

So you lied about ignoring me. Now that it's confirmed again that you're a liar ...

The paragraph immediately prior:

The letter, sent by the department's Civil Rights Division, expressed concerns that Newsom's still undetermined opening date for churches amounted to "unequal treatment of faith communities," and urged that the governor bump up houses of worship from phase two to phase three of his five-stage opening plan. California is currently in phase two.

And this ...

Dreiband noted that it appeared unfair that churches should have to close when other "essential" businesses were allowed to remain open.


It's so unfair!!! Churches are essential businesses too!!

My "warnings" are "or else". You should know this from all the times you'e been banned by Laurel.

The DOJ now issues legal opinions by way of "suggestion?" Never had the misfortune to receive communication from the BATF or the IRS, have you?

It's related, but not directly about.

Clearly

Clearly You argue for the sake of hearing your own voice no matter how dumb you make yourself look.

 

[Rightguide]

^^^
Pusillanimous perfidy on display.

What perfidy?

 

[Rightguide]

^^^ Has me on his buddy list ^^^

^^^

Has me on her buddy list, she replies to everything I post. Here's a friendly *nipple pinch* for active participation.

 

[phrodeau]

When and where is the California Totalitarian Derby? Are tickets on sale?

 

[schism666]

^^^

Has me on her buddy list, she replies to everything I post. Here's a friendly *nipple pinch* for active participation.

rape is funny! :corn:

 

[Rightguide]

rape is funny! :corn:

^^^
Incoherent dementia is sad.

 

[FlowersForFun]

Clearly You argue for the sake of hearing your own voice no matter how dumb you make yourself look.

Quoting the whole thread doesn't change the fact that you still aren't reading.

 

[Pookie]

Quoting the whole thread doesn't change anything.

The irony is the same applies to all your posts.

 

[MartinHeidegger]

If you show up in one of my threads I may remove your muzzle from time to time and let you bark and growl freely out of a general compassion for Man's best friend, even though you may not be one of my own. I do so from time to time as it's my choice to do so.

The concept of "essential businesses" is a totalitarian concept, that has nothing to do with controlling the CCP Virus. The left loves to pick winners and losers in the Soviet model they admired so much, but it has no place in a free country that recognizes individual inalienable rights and a free market system. Our country and states are bound by the Constitution and all exercised governmental power at every level is confined by its limits. Read the first five words of the First Amendment and understand they have been "incorporated" by the SCOTUS to bind the states as well. Now, shave off the stubby mustache, tear off the armband, and be a good freedom loving citizen.

^ This is better entertainment than Alex Jones.

 

[bestone4ever]

The irony is the same applies to all your posts.

but, but, but the "warning" wasn't the point.

Unless you mean that's exactly what the entire fucking thread is about.

 

[Conager]

I thought you said DOJ legal opinions are just suggestions?

 

[FlowersForFun]

but, but, but the "warning" wasn't the point.

Unless you mean that's exactly what the entire fucking thread is about.

Since you still can't read, let me spoon feed it to you.


Here is where things started.

That's not a "warning," Matlock. That's a statement.

This is a warning:

https://media.giphy.com/media/Cc74glR0ahiww/giphy.gif

get it? Hellooooo? McFly?

No that's a threat. Threats are the bastian of those that do not provide consequences after a warning.

A warning is corrective. A warning is enlightening. "You are on the wrong path" should be sufficient warning.

That's not a threat either, snowflake. Grow up.

Fact: that was definitively a threat.


https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/threat


Also a FACT: Rotadom is wrong again.

And this is where you jump in proving to everyone you can't read.

Which one of those applies to the OP, BotTard?

All caught up yet Tiger??

 

[HisArpy]

I thought you said DOJ legal opinions are just suggestions?

He doesn't know or care what he's been saying. As long as he says the opposite, he thinks he's doing well in the conversation.