Does the U.S. even need to be a military power?

pecksniff

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jun 4, 2021
Posts
22,077
What good is having a global network of military bases and the mightiest and most expensive military establishment in human history, if we can't beat a bunch of medieval fanatics in Afghanistan?
 
The military can. No doubt about it, imho.

The thing that has beat us here and in Vietnam is the prevalent political will
and how politically "astute" the top brass is; the Colin Powell effect.
The military has become a stepping stone to a real career
and not a stepping stone to a dignified retirement
having served the country with honors.

I blame Ike...



;)
 
No, the U.S. only needs to respond to direct threats with its strong military force, and not use that force to try to make every other nation on earth become some version of the U.S. or a U.S. colony.

The internal struggle in Viet Nam was not a direct threat to the U.S. Should have kept our nose out of that.

Never should have invaded Iraq.

Should have left Afghanistan immediately following a couple hard spankings of Al-Qaeda.

Should have never used military force for imperial empire building in the Middle East in the first place.
 
What good is having a global network of military bases and the mightiest and most expensive military establishment in human history, if we can't beat a bunch of medieval fanatics in Afghanistan?

The only reason we can't "beat" a bunch of medieval 3rd worlders with AK's is because any effort to actually do so has and will always be undermined by the left here in the USA.

Politically, culturally, economically.....they'll do anything and everything to make sure we lose and go home in disgrace.
 
Should have never used military force for imperial empire building in the Middle East in the first place.

But anything else is racist and Hitler!!!

We must kiss the bad guys ass's and throw money at them!! Give them jobs!
Just ask a (D)emocrap.... :rolleyes:
 
But anything else is racist and Hitler!!!

We must kiss the bad guys ass's and throw money at them!! Give them jobs!
Just ask a (D)emocrap.... :rolleyes:

^^^This coming from a histrionic military-welfare recipient who apparently supported throwing money at Afghanistan for the past 20 years.
 
What good is having a global network of military bases and the mightiest and most expensive military establishment in human history, if we can't beat a bunch of medieval fanatics in Afghanistan?

I think that the US plays the role of world police because it allows US-based corporations to safely operate overseas.
 
^^^This coming from a histrionic military-welfare recipient who apparently supported throwing money at Afghanistan for the past 20 years.

I'm not part of the "military industrial complex" and have never gotten any welfare.

You wish could support your lie that I've supported throwing money at Afghanistan for the past 20 years.

I've NEVER supported nation building and "hearts and minds" warfare. If you had ever stopped being so smug long enough to stop making shit up and read what I've actually said about Afghanistan for years is that we should have never run more than 1 or 2 firebases for CAG/DEVGRU supported by 75th/101st/82nd/10th to do wet work on high value targets.

Anything more would require a commitment to totally conquering and owning the place, anything less and a loss is just a matter of time.

Thanks for playing the "Lies and Ascription" game and losing bigly.

SAD :D

And nothing I've said is histrionic.
 
The real question should be, does the US have a real need for the Democrat Party?
 
Ask the biden admin. He and his dem. never

What good is having a global network of military bases and the mightiest and most expensive military establishment in human history, if we can't beat a bunch of medieval fanatics in Afghanistan?

fight a war, they fight a holding war same as in VN!!
 
you're fucking insane

But anything else is racist and Hitler!!!

We must kiss the bad guys ass's and throw money at them!! Give them jobs!
Just ask a (D)emocrap.... :rolleyes:

and brain washed by the left. I think you would to destroy this county and all real Americans!
 
No country in the history of man has "conquered" Afghanistan. It was stupid we thought we were different.

Now...to your question. No. This bullshit of policing the World must stop. Not our job to shovel shit.
 
I think that the US plays the role of world police because it allows US-based corporations to safely operate overseas.

ISTM not even that role is needed any more. Most of the continents are more or less politically stable; such wars as happen are local affairs. No country still needs American military protection -- even SK could take care of itself if it came to war with NK (so long as China stayed out of it). As for protecting "the freedom of the seas," from what, Somali pirates?
 
I'm not part of the "military industrial complex" **TWITCH** and have never gotten any welfare. **TWITCH**
You wish could support your lie**TWITCH** that I've supported throwing money at Afghanistan for the past 20 years.

...

Thanks for playing the "Lies **TWITCH** and Ascription**TWITCH**" game and losing **TWITCH** bigly.

SAD :D

And nothing I've said is histrionic.**TWITCH**

Teh downward spiral continues...
 
ISTM not even that role is needed any more. Most of the continents are more or less politically stable; such wars as happen are local affairs. No country still needs American military protection -- even SK could take care of itself if it came to war with NK (so long as China stayed out of it). As for protecting "the freedom of the seas," from what, Somali pirates?

I didn't opine that it was necessary, I just think that the global economy is the reason for a global police force. If that is the case, then corporations who benefit from that protection should at least pay taxes.
 
The only countries left that could put up against the U.S. the kind of conventional-warfare fight the whole DoD is designed for are Russia and China -- and we really, really, don't ever want to tangle with them, they're still nuclear powers.
 
The only countries left that could put up against the U.S. the kind of conventional-warfare fight the whole DoD is designed for are Russia and China -- and we really, really, don't ever want to tangle with them, they're still nuclear powers.

They only want to tangle with us because your crazed pussy is President.
 
Yes, the United States needs to be seen as a military power and one that projects beyond its boarders. That's the best way to ensure that whatever active warfare there is will be somewhere other than on U.S. soil. This is simply reality.
 
The only reason we can't "beat" a bunch of medieval 3rd worlders with AK's is because any effort to actually do so has and will always be undermined by the left here in the USA.

Politically, culturally, economically.....they'll do anything and everything to make sure we lose and go home in disgrace.

Is this really a matter of "the left"? Don't forget, we got into 'Nam under Johnson, a New Deal Democrat.
 
The internal struggle in Viet Nam was not a direct threat to the U.S. Should have kept our nose out of that.

Of course, that was a theater of the Cold War.

Different world. It will never come back.
 
Back
Top