Does part of the United States suffer from amnesia

gotsnowgotslush

skates like Eck
Joined
Dec 24, 2007
Posts
25,720
I see people blaming President Obama for actions and decisions made, before he was approached for the office of President of the United States.

President Obama is an intelligent man, with fairly good judgement.
He was well informed about the mountain of trouble that he would be taking on.
He knew the that nearly half of the country chose unhinged Senator John McCain
and absolutely crack pated ex Governor Sarah Palin.

And yet, he took the job.
He did not take over a calm economy,with plenty of surplus left over from Bill Clinton. He took over a country teetering over a chasm of disaster.

The past year has consisted of paying attention to trivia, when the people of the United States are suffering from deprivation of the most basic of needs.
The people who are given a paycheck from the government to do a job, and the power to give help to children and mothers, and take sadistic joy in denying it.
/end gsgs comment

Trump is of the opinion that "..we’re a poor country now."

The most glaring mistake is that, unlike after World War II, America is a “poor country now.” This is simply untrue. In 1950, the U.S. economy (gross domestic product) produced $2.2 trillion of goods and services as measured by inflation-adjusted “2009 dollars.” In 2015, U.S. GDP was $16.3 trillion, or more than seven times greater. Eliminating any boost from population growth (a doubling since 1950 to 320 million) still leaves today’s economy nearly four times larger than its 1950 counterpart.

Living standards have moved broadly higher, despite a debate over how much of added income has recently gone to the top 1 percent.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...bbe9fc-f2bd-11e5-85a6-2132cf446d0a_story.html


Corporations are profiting and growing, and the same sneering executives are better off than they were.

It is the people who are living under a system that the corporations have bought and paid for.

President Obama is working within a frame work of what was, and what is.
Thank goodness, there are people assisting him, that know more than trivia.

President Obama took the weight of the world on his shoulders.
So did Jimmy Carter. Jimmy Carter was not a worldly man.
Jimmy entered the door at age 35.
He looked like an old man, when he left the Whitehouse.
 
You love democrats and all problems come from everything but Democrats...who are PERFECT!!!

We get you love your Kool Aid.
 
President Obama took the weight of the world on his shoulders.
So did Jimmy Carter. Jimmy Carter was not a worldly man.
Jimmy entered the door at age 35.
He looked like an old man, when he left the Whitehouse.

Wikipedia-
"James Earl "Jimmy" Carter Jr. (born October 1, 1924) is an American politician and author who served as the 39th President of the United States from 1977 to 1981. "

Please check your math.
 
Jimmy Carter, who has rarely used his full name--James Earl Carter, Jr.--was born
October 1, 1924 in Plains, Georgia.

He could not have been 35, when he sat down in the President's chair. *sigh*

http://us-presidents.insidegov.com/q/4/9701/How-old-was-Jimmy-Carter-when-he-became-president

In 1962 he entered state politics, and eight years later he was elected Governor of Georgia.

Carter announced his candidacy for President in December 1974 and began a two-year campaign that gradually gained momentum.


In the Middle East, through the Camp David agreement of 1978, he helped bring amity between Egypt and Israel.

The consequences of Iran's holding Americans captive, together with continuing inflation at home, contributed to Carter's defeat in 1980.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/1600/presidents/jimmycarter
 
well, you are one of those mentally defective people that need help.





please turn yourself in for treatment



obama is a dipshit

obama, never had a real job

obama, what has that pile of pig shit done?

has obama ever had a plan?

has obama had a real idea?

hum....obama the definition of an empty suit

the only reason why you love obama: more welfare


I see people blaming President Obama for actions and decisions made, before he was approached for the office of President of the United States.

President Obama is an intelligent man, with fairly good judgement.
He was well informed about the mountain of trouble that he would be taking on.
He knew the that nearly half of the country chose unhinged Senator John McCain
and absolutely crack pated ex Governor Sarah Palin.

And yet, he took the job.
He did not take over a calm economy,with plenty of surplus left over from Bill Clinton. He took over a country teetering over a chasm of disaster.

The past year has consisted of paying attention to trivia, when the people of the United States are suffering from deprivation of the most basic of needs.
The people who are given a paycheck from the government to do a job, and the power to give help to children and mothers, and take sadistic joy in denying it.
/end gsgs comment

Trump is of the opinion that "..we’re a poor country now."

The most glaring mistake is that, unlike after World War II, America is a “poor country now.” This is simply untrue. In 1950, the U.S. economy (gross domestic product) produced $2.2 trillion of goods and services as measured by inflation-adjusted “2009 dollars.” In 2015, U.S. GDP was $16.3 trillion, or more than seven times greater. Eliminating any boost from population growth (a doubling since 1950 to 320 million) still leaves today’s economy nearly four times larger than its 1950 counterpart.

Living standards have moved broadly higher, despite a debate over how much of added income has recently gone to the top 1 percent.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...bbe9fc-f2bd-11e5-85a6-2132cf446d0a_story.html


Corporations are profiting and growing, and the same sneering executives are better off than they were.

It is the people who are living under a system that the corporations have bought and paid for.

President Obama is working within a frame work of what was, and what is.
Thank goodness, there are people assisting him, that know more than trivia.

President Obama took the weight of the world on his shoulders.
So did Jimmy Carter. Jimmy Carter was not a worldly man.
Jimmy entered the door at age 35.
He looked like an old man, when he left the Whitehouse.
 
well, you are one of those mentally defective people that need help.


the only reason why you love obama: more welfare

If anything at all were fair, you'd be dead or institutionalized so the rest of us didn't have to deal with you.

Also, what is it called when a mentally defective person calls someone else a mentally defective person?! Oh, that's right: Not important enough to be given a name.
 
You love democrats and all problems come from everything but Democrats...who are PERFECT!!!

We get you love your Kool Aid.

It was a Democrat who gave us the Vietnam Conflict but it was a Republican who gave us HIV/AIDS and caused the deaths of thousands of hemaphiliacs. It has been Congress that has given us our National debt, not the President.
 
It was a Democrat who gave us the Vietnam Conflict but it was a Republican who gave us HIV/AIDS and caused the deaths of thousands of hemaphiliacs.

Well that's a new one...LOL

Where the fuck did you come up with that? :confused:

Last I read on it HIV most likely has been around for far longer than we thought, we just didn't realize what it was because dumb humans.

It has been Congress that has given us our National debt, not the President.

Not really, POTUS has to at least partially own the debt.

Here is a little info-graphic on how the budget works.
https://media.nationalpriorities.org/uploads/budget_process_2015.png
 
Last edited:
Last I read on it HIV most likely has been around for far longer than we thought, we just didn't realize what it was because dumb humans.

Yes...?! "...B/c dumb humans..." what?? Complete the thought. I would say "speak for yourself", but you made it clear by your incomplete sentence that you were speaking of a group to which you belong.
 
The thought is complete.

Maybe you have a hard time with English?

It may have been too smart for you, but so is the chair I'm sitting on.

Your thought was not complete, but that's far from the first time. Your second sentence was one I posted first.
 
Yes it was.

Maybe you have a hard time with English?

It may have been too smart for you, but so is the chair I'm sitting on.

I understand English fine, as well as the difference between incomplete thoughts & complete thoughts.

I will excuse your failure to understand that difference, since you are clearly incapable of either, hence half your posts replying to me being things I myself wrote.
 
I understand English fine, as well as the difference between incomplete thoughts & complete thoughts.

I will excuse your failure to understand that difference, since you are clearly incapable of either, hence half your posts replying to me being things I myself wrote.

Apparently not, the thought was complete and you seem to think it's not brah!

Like.....wtf LOL....there is a period at the end and everything, I double checked brah!

Can you not English good or wut? :confused:
 
Apparently not, the thought was complete and you seem to think it's not brah!

Like.....wtf LOL.

Can you not English good or wut? :confused:

The thought was incomplete, & anyone capable of thought knows that fact. I will not answer your question regarding English as its phrasing makes it clear you would fail to comprehend any reply.
 
Anyone who can read knows it's not.



I know, it's over your head.

Sorry brah! I'm not gonna lower my standards just so you can understand brah!

Anyone who can read knows your posts are either incomplete thoughts, someone else's thoughts, or not thoughts at all.

Also, you can't lower something that doesn't exist (for instance, "brah" & "4r4r: don't exist as words).
 
Anyone who can read knows your posts are either incomplete thoughts, someone else's thoughts, or not thoughts at all.

If they can read they know they aren't incomplete thoughts.

And how can they be someone else's thoughts? They happen in my brain dummy!

Also, you can't lower something that doesn't exist (for instance, "brah" & "4r4r: don't exist as words).

They exist because I say they do.

BRAHHHHH!! They totally exist!! They get used ALL the fuckin' time.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=brah

See...I even have citation brah...so now know yew know it's like 4r4r.
 
"Brah" was used in Nigeria in the 60's, and popularized by The Beatles in "Ob La Di Ob La Da".

"4r4r" is nothing but a typing exercise.
 
If they can read they know they aren't incomplete thoughts.

And how can they be someone else's thoughts? They happen in my brain dummy!

If they can read & comprehend, they know they are incomplete thoughts.

They happen in the posts you copy them from without citing that you are quoting.

They exist because I say they do.

BRAHHHHH!! They totally exist!! They get used ALL the fuckin' time.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=brah

See...I even have citation brah...so now know yew know it's like 4r4r.

Saying or wishing does not make something so.

Also, your "citations" mean nothing. For instance, you exist on the Internet, but your ancestors would not admit to your relation to them existing.
 
"Brah" was used in Nigeria in the 60's, and popularized by The Beatles in "Ob La Di Ob La Da".

"4r4r" is nothing but a typing exercise.

You need to get out more.

If they can read & comprehend, they know they are incomplete thoughts.

They happen in the posts you copy them from without citing that you are quoting.

Except they aren't.

Look at you using a bunch of words and saying things that have already been said without citation.


Saying or wishing does not make something so.

But it does make language so.

Also, your "citations" mean nothing.

Saying or wishing does not make something so, the citation is valid and you're wrong.
 
You need to get out more.

You need to stay out of threads until you can post about them & not other posters.

Except they aren't.

They are, even compared to that small-yet-complete thought.

Look at you using a bunch of words and saying things that have already been said without citation.

No need for citation since people of average intelligence understand them, & that they were already said by me.

But it does make language so.

No. There are rules to follow when making words & phrases to put in dictionaries or vernaculars, & your claims of things being words are not among these.

Saying or wishing does not make something so, the citation is invalid and you're wrong.

Far quicker to simply correct your incorrect statement.
 
Back
Top