does confident, submissive behavior turn on Dominant Women?

[jlust]

I ask because there's a gorgeous woman who manages me from time to time, and when I was working with her recently, she seemed to have noticed that I am very submissive around her, and she started lightly flirting/touching me while she explained something to me. While she was reading a list of names, when she got to my name, she said it rather seductively. It is against company policy to even fraternize in our positions, and nothing has happened yet, but we still exchange looks and nods from time to time. If anything, that "rule" we have to follow probably makes it even more of a taboo for us to engage in anything, but I would absolutely worship this woman if she wanted us to meet.

Maybe it's because of the respect I give her, but it was very obvious we were both turned on by our reciprocal behaviors (me being passive, her being dominant)

 

[Temptress_lee]

I think it's sexy when a guy is willing to submit. Ecpecially a really masculint looking guy who you wouldn't expect to submit. There's just something really hot about it.

 

[NemoAlia]

...there's a gorgeous woman who manages me from time to time...

I think it's telling that it didn't even occur to me that you were talking about the workplace until I got to the part about "company policy."

 

[VelvetDarkness]

Who's policy is it anyway?

I think you hit the nail with confident submissive behaviour.

This woman is turned on by your submission to her as a manager - and more - but just as much by the fact that you're not threatened by her dominance. You have indicated, I think, that this power dynamic would extend to a personal encounter and she sounds like she loves the idea.

As for 'company policy' so what? Who's gonna know?

Even if they find out, you could never be disciplined or dismissed over it, as long as you're both doing your jobs.

I say push the flirting slightly and see if she makes a move...

Velvet

 

[Vixandra]

I prefer my subs confident. I'm not the greatest ego stroker and constantly reassuring someone is not one of my abilities.

There's something about a woman or man that will tell others to go to hell, is confident and ready for fun to come and kneel before oneself, trusting with all that confidence, all that spunk and spirit.

 

[NemoAlia]

Any news?

 

[Emma_Ray_Garrett]

I prefer my subs confident. I'm not the greatest ego stroker and constantly reassuring someone is not one of my abilities.

There's something about a woman or man that will tell others to go to hell, is confident and ready for fun to come and kneel before oneself, trusting with all that confidence, all that spunk and spirit.

I totally agree. And there is a difference between confident and cocky. Cocky is guaranteed to get a sub male bound, ball gagged, and reamed by me. Confident is something else entirely.

And the more masculine, the better in my book. I absolutely delight in an alpha type male's submission. Talk about a rush, LOL.

 

[Lilith]

If I think he's the type to just roll over and beg for anyone and everyone, I have no use for him. Much more attracted to a man who is submissive to no one but me.

 

[shy slave]

I
Even if they find out, you could never be disciplined or dismissed over it, as long as you're both doing your jobs.

Velvet

Have to comment on this.
In terms of the UK employment law and company policies
It does depend on what the company policy states.
If its clear in the policy then you can be dismissed for breach of company policy, just as with any other breach.
The type of breach is not the issue, but how the policy is written.

Find out before making an error that could cost you your job.
Also are you sure she is a Domme and not just enjoying a level of flirting?

 

[Emma_Ray_Garrett]

If I think he's the type to just roll over and beg for anyone and everyone, I have no use for him. Much more attracted to a man who is submissive to no one but me.

*nods* That's absolutely the best. When you have a sub who bows down before you and only you.

 

[Softouch911]

I wonder if it makes a difference if the submissive is male or not -- I know I wouldn't be interested in a female submissive who did not have a lot of confidence.

A submissive who only has "needy" to offer is a burden in her (and I presume, his) dependence. The sumission of a strong wo/man is a gift, an honor, and guaranteed to thrill.

"Doormats" need not apply, imo.

ST

 

[saw_man1]

Doesn't everyone?

Don’t most people prefer confidence to a lack thereof?

 

[Emma_Ray_Garrett]

I'd imagine yes, saw_man. And ST nails it in one. Neediness is very much a turn off. While I don't mind dictating certain things to my sub, the last thing I want is a sub who NEEDS me to dictate their entire day/life. And I've had a few like that. Constantly needing me, wanting me to tell them what to do, etc.

I don't want an automaton, I want a hot-blooded, thinking wo/man. Confidence is a must for me.

 

[ladyscottishwhore]

i think it very hott

i think it is very hot when a guy submits to me it a very big turn on. to know that a guy is will to do that