Does anyone else find it weird that the same party that wants to “save the world for

bbx56

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jan 29, 2019
Posts
5,258
Does anyone else find it weird that the same party that wants to “save the world for the future generations”


also is perfectly fine with post birth abortion and infanticide?

also tells us having kids is bad for the planet?
 
Does anyone else find it weird that the same party that wants to “save the world for the future generations”


also is perfectly fine with post birth abortion and infanticide?

also tells us having kids is bad for the planet?

As long as you’re not having kids we’ll be fine.
 
1 Son is a Prof at Cal Tech, and has 12 patents

1 Daughter is a Managing Director at a Pvt Equity firm

Another son own 38 apt buildings



So what the fuck is YOU problem, NIGGER?
 
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/03/go...s-unhinged-cpac-speech-republican-party-dead/

Appearing on MSNBC with host Alex Witt, GOP strategist Rick Tyler was visibly upset at what he heard from Donald Trump during his speech at CPAC, and even more so by the enthusiastic reception the president was receiving.

“It’s interesting about CPAC,” Tyler began. “It used to be the confab of conservatives who would get together once a year but it’s not CPAC anymore — it hasn’t been since 2016. It’s now Trump-pac and should be TPAC.”

“The people there talk about being pro-tariffs, anti-justice, anti-law enforcement, anti-immigrant, anti-Muslim, pro-Russia, pro-autocrat,” he continued. “It’s unrecognizable what Donald Trump has done to the party and what he’s done to the conservative movement — it’s a shame.”

Asked by host Witt, “What can be done to resurrect the Republican Party as it was — or is that gone?” Tyler said the party is dead.

“Rest in peace,” he lamented. “No, it’s over. The problem is that the Republican Party has no grounding governing philosophy anymore because they’ve signed on to all these things as I just mentioned that were antithetical to the conservative movement.”
Filling the void left by the collapse of the GOP will be the Democrats, thanks to people like you. Well done.
 
The Weekly Standard and NRO determined that this school of thought is right...


Where are they now? Where did their audience go?


The same place as white blue-collar Democrats?
 
busybody, if you keep posting this prolifically, then you can turn around and claim to be as popular as RoryN.

You, he and Charlie Sheen are "winning."


:D ;) ;)
 
Getting rid of humans IS saving the world. Less people means less pollution and less destruction of the environment.

We should be funding abortions for all who want one. It helps to reduce the population and crime at the same time.
 
Getting rid of humans IS saving the world. Less people means less pollution and less destruction of the environment.

We should be funding abortions for all who want one. It helps to reduce the population and crime at the same time.

Then why does the left use the USA's low birthrate to justify illegal immigration?

The birthrate of Western Societies is less than replacement, and the 3rd world shitholes' birthrate is way above replacement. Should America go over to other countries and demand they let us abort their children? Perhaps we should try to colonize them and show them how to live in a responsible civilization?
 
1 Son is a Prof at Cal Tech, and has 12 patents

1 Daughter is a Managing Director at a Pvt Equity firm

Another son own 38 apt buildings



So what the fuck is YOU problem, NIGGER?

Sure.
 
Does anyone else find it weird that the same party that wants to “save the world for the future generations”


also is perfectly fine with post birth abortion and infanticide?

also tells us having kids is bad for the planet?

They hate standing in line.
 
Then why does the left use the USA's low birthrate to justify illegal immigration?

The birthrate of Western Societies is less than replacement, and the 3rd world shitholes' birthrate is way above replacement. Should America go over to other countries and demand they let us abort their children? Perhaps we should try to colonize them and show them how to live in a responsible civilization?

It evens things out. If we're short 50K people a year, we let in 50K.

Further, the right also wants illegal immigration. Who do you think is working at the con artist's failing golf courses in Florida and New Jersey? Who do you think all the uneducateds who voted for the con artist have picking their apples, peaches, and oranges? Who do you think works at hotels in this country? This doesn't include the people working in the meat processing plants in Iowa and Nebraska. How about the people working in construction? I highly doubt many of the folks working in that industry are against the con artist.

Texas doesn't even do anything about businesses who employ illegals, and that state overwhelmingly voted for the con artist and walks in lockstep with him. Except on this one subject. Hmmmm.

https://www.texastribune.org/2016/12/19/big-name-businesses-exploit-immigrant-labor/

https://www.texastribune.org/2016/12/14/lawmakers-go-easy-employers-undocumented-workers/

Dalton, Georgia, hardly a liberal bastion, is concerned they'll lose thousands of people to deportations of illegals working in their businesses:

https://www.npr.org/2018/02/19/585770437/why-employers-in-georgia-are-watching-the-immigration-debate-closely

Here's what happened in 2007 to one New Jersey town which passed a law banning renting or hiring illegals. Long story short, businesses which employed people closed up shop.

https://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/26/nyregion/26riverside.html

Here's one for you. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, a seething hotbed of progressive thinking, has said illegals should be allowed to remain and work in this country so long as they don't have a criminal record:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2011-07-07/how-to-be-a-patriot-hire-an-illegal-immigrant

Obama wanted to be tougher on employers who used illegals, and yet no one wants to bring up that fact:

"Our goal is compliance and deterrence," said Brad Bench, special agent in charge at ICE's Seattle office. "The majority of the companies we do audits on end up with no fines at all, but again it's part of the deterrence method. If companies know we're out there, looking across the board, they're more likely to bring themselves into compliance."​

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2012/12/23/audits-illegal-immigrants/1787213/

So where were Republicans when Obama proposed this? Still being the party of no because they didn't want him to have any success, so instead of siding with him on this one subject and getting what they wanted, Republicans cut off their nose to spite their face. And now they whine he did nothing even though arrests and deportations soared during his presidency. But you never heard that on the Fox tabloid so never knew the truth, did you?

So yeah, it's only those on the left who want to justify illegal immigration. :rolleyes:
 
It evens things out. If we're short 50K people a year, we let in 50K.

Further, the right also wants illegal immigration. Who do you think is working at the con artist's failing golf courses in Florida and New Jersey? Who do you think all the uneducateds who voted for the con artist have picking their apples, peaches, and oranges? Who do you think works at hotels in this country? This doesn't include the people working in the meat processing plants in Iowa and Nebraska. How about the people working in construction? I highly doubt many of the folks working in that industry are against the con artist.

Texas doesn't even do anything about businesses who employ illegals, and that state overwhelmingly voted for the con artist and walks in lockstep with him. Except on this one subject. Hmmmm.

https://www.texastribune.org/2016/12/19/big-name-businesses-exploit-immigrant-labor/

https://www.texastribune.org/2016/12/14/lawmakers-go-easy-employers-undocumented-workers/

Dalton, Georgia, hardly a liberal bastion, is concerned they'll lose thousands of people to deportations of illegals working in their businesses:

https://www.npr.org/2018/02/19/585770437/why-employers-in-georgia-are-watching-the-immigration-debate-closely

Here's what happened in 2007 to one New Jersey town which passed a law banning renting or hiring illegals. Long story short, businesses which employed people closed up shop.

https://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/26/nyregion/26riverside.html

Here's one for you. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, a seething hotbed of progressive thinking, has said illegals should be allowed to remain and work in this country so long as they don't have a criminal record:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2011-07-07/how-to-be-a-patriot-hire-an-illegal-immigrant

Obama wanted to be tougher on employers who used illegals, and yet no one wants to bring up that fact:

"Our goal is compliance and deterrence," said Brad Bench, special agent in charge at ICE's Seattle office. "The majority of the companies we do audits on end up with no fines at all, but again it's part of the deterrence method. If companies know we're out there, looking across the board, they're more likely to bring themselves into compliance."​

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2012/12/23/audits-illegal-immigrants/1787213/

So where were Republicans when Obama proposed this? Still being the party of no because they didn't want him to have any success, so instead of siding with him on this one subject and getting what they wanted, Republicans cut off their nose to spite their face. And now they whine he did nothing even though arrests and deportations soared during his presidency. But you never heard that on the Fox tabloid so never knew the truth, did you?

So yeah, it's only those on the left who want to justify illegal immigration. :rolleyes:

You should listen to Michelle Malkin at CPAC 2019. You'd love what she has to say.

Republican Conservatives are talking about it.
 
If Michelle Malkin and I agree on anything it only means the end of the Republic is at hand. Listening to her is like the proverbial nails on a chalkboard.

She's a sexy beast, and helping clean the Republic up for it's glorious return!
 
Getting rid of humans IS saving the world. Less people means less pollution and less destruction of the environment.

We should be funding abortions for all who want one. It helps to reduce the population and crime at the same time.

If you really believed that utter bullshit, why haven't you committed suicide yet? Serious question.
 
Does anyone else find it weird that the same party that wants to “save the world for the future generations”


also is perfectly fine with post birth abortion and infanticide?

also tells us having kids is bad for the planet?

Or for destroying the economy of the United States, the biggest capitalist engine of prosperity the world has ever known, thus taking away any future the survivors may have otherwise enjoyed because of it.
 
Back
Top