LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Does anybody here really care about keeping America white-majority?

P

Politruk

Loves Spam
Joined
Oct 13, 2024
Posts
18,471
That was the stated purpose of Immigration Act of 1924. Back then, whites losing majority status was not really imminent -- but now, it seems inevitable that it will happen by 2050.

And one is tempted to suspect that does play some role in today's immigration politics.

Check out this cartoon.
 
We all know immigration would not be an issue if the immigrants were coming from Canada.

And that is not because Canadians speak English.
 
Rob_Royale said:
Nope. In fact, as a white guy, it's my most fervent hope that someday the world has so successfully interbred that there is only one race. Every time I see a happy interracial couple I inwardly cheer for them.
Click to expand...
This is the destructive, diabolical, dreary, dystopian dream of the “diversity” cult!
The “melting pot”, the mixing of everything together to a uniform blandness. The end of diversity or, at least, physical diversity among all we beautiful humans.
Why don’t you first attempt to make all dogs the same breed, all sheep, all cattle, you name it, trees, flowers, corn?? Maybe, as a thought experiment, you should think about that first, see how that might end up before cheering the end of diversity for all humans. Unsurprisingly, I have heard no diversity disciple arguing the benefits of complete miscegenation of non human sub species (I wonder how that would go down?) man made or not, but, apparently this is the utopia for the human species. Why?? Muhh…, no more war? Muhh…, no more “Hitlers”?? Grow up! This is infantile tier thinking or hoping.
I am all for diversity and that means maintaining our culture and “people” as a part of that, not our and all others destruction, as you would like, and, for that, you would call me “racist”! Oh, the irony.
Of course you may not have thought through your position, in which case you are just a virtue signaller or you are the true “racist”, a hater of different cultures and peoples as, by your own admission, “it is your most fervent hope”, regarding “only one race”, and, “I inwardly cheer”.
I would hope that you might reconsider your position as, I fervently believe, your cure would be infinitely worse than the disease you imagine, which is simply life in all its wonder.
 
ho_hum_drum said:
This is the destructive, diabolical, dreary, dystopian dream of the “diversity” cult!
The “melting pot”, the mixing of everything together to a uniform blandness. The end of diversity or, at least, physical diversity among all we beautiful humans.
Why don’t you first attempt to make all dogs the same breed, all sheep, all cattle, you name it, trees, flowers, corn?? Maybe, as a thought experiment, you should think about that first, see how that might end up before cheering the end of diversity for all humans. Unsurprisingly, I have heard no diversity disciple arguing the benefits of complete miscegenation of non human sub species (I wonder how that would go down?) man made or not, but, apparently this is the utopia for the human species. Why?? Muhh…, no more war? Muhh…, no more “Hitlers”?? Grow up! This is infantile tier thinking or hoping.
I am all for diversity and that means maintaining our culture and “people” as a part of that, not our and all others destruction, as you would like, and, for that, you would call me “racist”! Oh, the irony.
Of course you may not have thought through your position, in which case you are just a virtue signaller or you are the true “racist”, a hater of different cultures and peoples as, by your own admission, “it is your most fervent hope”, regarding “only one race”, and, “I inwardly cheer”.
I would hope that you might reconsider your position as, I fervently believe, your cure would be infinitely worse than the disease you imagine, which is simply life in all its wonder.
Click to expand...
Gishy gallop

Ftw
 
ho_hum_drum said:
I am all for diversity and that means maintaining our culture and “people” as a part of that, not our and all others destruction, as you would like, and, for that, you would call me “racist”! Oh, the irony.
Click to expand...
It certainly is racist, if you mean maintaining our "people" as a distinct gene-pool.
 
Try E’s raw
Politruk said:
It certainly is racist, if you mean maintaining our "people" as a distinct gene-pool.
Click to expand...
What do you imply by “distinct gene pool”?Are you suggesting people and groups of people are distinct because of genetic differences? Be careful! This could and would be used to accuse you, Politruk, of racism! As I said, yes, you (not you per de but the poster I was replying to) would call me a “racist”, so be it. But, it is very dark, at least to me, to express a desire and to cheer on the extinction of a species or even a sub species of life. I’m simply pointing out the inherent contradiction of those who would say they’re all for diversity whilst fantasising its destruction.
 
ho_hum_drum said:
Try E’s raw

What do you imply by “distinct gene pool”?Are you suggesting people and groups of people are distinct because of genetic differences? Be careful! This could and would be used to accuse you, Politruk, of racism! As I said, yes, you (not you per de but the poster I was replying to) would call me a “racist”, so be it. But, it is very dark, at least to me, to express a desire and to cheer on the extinction of a species or even a sub species of life. I’m simply pointing out the inherent contradiction of those who would say they’re all for diversity whilst fantasising its destruction.
Click to expand...
I'm confused a bit here, are white people a "species" or a "sub species"?
Or am I missing your point altogether here?
 
RobDownSouth said:
I'm confused a bit here, are white people a "species" or a "sub species"?
Or am I missing your point altogether here?
Click to expand...
My take is you've probably got it right, but he's going to claim otherwise. That's how the Southern strategy always worked: "But I didn't actually say that!" (And it's true, they didn't; they just implied it as clearly as anyone could.)
 
White men are the most beautiful and powerful of all things in creation.
 
I hate the fact that people describe other people with differing skin tones as different 'races'

there IS only one race: the human race. All differences in skin colour or genetic tendencies towards build or susceptibility to various diseases are all secondary traits.

I don't want to see everyone looking identical, be it skin colour or hair colour & types/eye shapes & colours/height/builds but, instead, for there to be SO much diversity, so much blending, that there is NO specific distinction that can be called out as belonging to 'a different race'. Let people be seen for the individuals they are, not as someone belonging to a 'white' or 'black' race.
 
Rob_Royale said:
Nope. In fact, as a white guy, it's my most fervent hope that someday the world has so successfully interbred that there is only one race. Every time I see a happy interracial couple I inwardly cheer for them.
Click to expand...

Why thank you, thank you, I appreciate this. Just doing my own bit for miscegenation, one generation at a time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
Orlando/North America Submissive guy seeking Dominant connection
Replies
3
Views
288
RJ316
R
gotsnowgotslush
Who does America turn to, in troubled times ?
Replies
16
Views
1K
phrodeau
phrodeau
T
What should I write about? Options offered and opinions sought.
Replies
17
Views
1K
mordbrand
M
T
What should I write about? Options offered and opinions sought.
Replies
10
Views
2K
LiverpoolMaster
L
Hard_Rom
Why it's better to be Canadian than American.
3 4 5
Replies
116
Views
6K
Bray123
B
Back
Top