Do you think Mueller should be fired?

Should Mueller be fired


  • Total voters
    109
I think Mueller's investigation is an intentional misdirection in defense of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Deep State actors, already being purged by the FBI and the DOJ, who conspired to disrupt Trumps election and presidency. The IG report coming out in the next couple of weeks will bear this out and lead to felony prosecutions of some. Each one of his findings will me followed up with appropriate congressional oversight investigation and further criminal referrals. Democrats are going to be thoroughly exposed. You don't get to conspire against the United States Constitution, the voting franchise of the American people, frame a duly elected President, and subvert his administration, and simply retire and head off into the sunset with benefits. You get to go to jail.

Nobody outside of the lib tossers care.
 
there are times where i seriously think that rightguide is just a very well programmed bot. either that or a psychopath. normal people just don't lie quite as easily or as often or with as much gusto as he does.

He is vetteman reincarnated. It's possible he's a bot, like botanydummy.
 
I think we can slide Hicks over to the cooperating column after quitting because she was betrayed (read witness tampered) by Trump, and decided to quit.
 
I think we can slide Hicks over to the cooperating column after quitting because she was betrayed (read witness tampered) by Trump, and decided to quit.


DonDon has no Hope? Guess I missed that one somewhere. I thought she was still under his desk.
 
Do you think Mueller should be fired?


I think he should get on with the arrest warrants.
 
Nah... Nothing wrong Goin on.. :rolleyes:

Amurica!

https://www.yahoo.com/news/jared-kushner-apos-family-business-090635855.html

Jared Kushner's Family Business Was Loaned Hundreds Of Millions of Dollars After White House Meetings With Top Executives

News is flooding out now.

https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/tr...e-in-u-s-1519919321?__twitter_impression=true

A top Republican fundraiser close to President Donald Trump was in negotiations to earn tens of millions of dollars if the U.S. Justice Department dropped its investigation into a multibillion-dollar graft scandal involving a Malaysian state investment fund, according to emails reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.

In emails dated during the past year, Elliott Broidy, a venture capitalist and a longtime Republican donor, and his wife, Robin Rosenzweig, an attorney, discuss setting up a consulting contract with Jho Low, the Malaysian businessman at the center of the 1Malaysia Development Bhd. scandal, which brought scrutiny to the country’s prime minister, Najib Razak . The messages include draft agreements between Ms. Rosenzweig’s California law firm and representatives of Mr. Low about the possible terms of their business engagement. In one draft, there is a proposal that includes a $75 million fee if the Justice Department quickly drops its investigation.

Along with the contract drafts, the emails also appear to show Mr. Broidy prepared talking points for Malaysia’s prime minister ahead of a 2017 visit to Washington that included a meeting with Mr. Trump and other officials. In the talking points, the prime minister was advised to state that Malaysia wanted to emphasize its work with the U.S. in confronting North Korea, while also arguing against the U.S. legal pursuit of the 1MDB matter. It isn’t clear what, if anything, came of the talking points.
 
Mueller should spring her and bring her in for a chat.

(CNN)A self-described Russian "seductress" is asking for US help to escape a Thai detention center in exchange for information on alleged links between US President Donald Trump and Russia, according to her Instagram account.

http://www.kn-online.de/var/storage/images/media/haz/bilder/dcx/2018/2/plauderte-das-treffen-zwischen-deripaskas-und-prichodko-aus/681440736-3-ger-DE/Plauderte-das-Treffen-zwischen-Deripaskas-und-Prichodko-aus_imagelarge.jpg
 
Thought this might as well go here

'Unstable, inept, inexperienced, and also unethical': Former CIA director delivers a brutal assessment of Trump

  • Former CIA director John Brennan delivered a brutal assessment of President Donald Trump on Friday, capping off the most tumultuous week the administration has seen in months.
  • Trump is "unstable, inept, inexperienced, and also unethical," Brennan said in an interview with MSNBC.
  • Brennan said he has gone from being "angry" at Trump for his words and actions, to a state of "deep worry and concern" about what he described as a lack of leadership in the White House.
  • His comments follow a week that saw an avalanche of troubling headlines about top Trump aides, the Russia investigation, high-profile White House departures, and a widely criticized policy announcement that prompted near-immediate global backlash.



http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-is-unstable-inept-and-also-unethical-john-brennan-says-2018-3
 
'Unstable, inept, inexperienced, and also unethical': Former CIA director delivers a brutal assessment of Trump

  • Former CIA director John Brennan delivered a brutal assessment of President Donald Trump on Friday, capping off the most tumultuous week the administration has seen in months.
  • Trump is "unstable, inept, inexperienced, and also unethical," Brennan said in an interview with MSNBC.
  • Brennan said he has gone from being "angry" at Trump for his words and actions, to a state of "deep worry and concern" about what he described as a lack of leadership in the White House.
  • His comments follow a week that saw an avalanche of troubling headlines about top Trump aides, the Russia investigation, high-profile White House departures, and a widely criticized policy announcement that prompted near-immediate global backlash.



http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-is-unstable-inept-and-also-unethical-john-brennan-says-2018-3

Brennan is a most political, unreliable, self serving, source who may soon be facing felony charges of his own.
 
http://amp.slate.com/news-and-polit...steele-dossier.html?__twitter_impression=true


The most publicized event, the White House senior adviser and presidential son-in-law losing his security clearance, was the least surprising. The more shocking—and potentially important—revelations are two stories about massive loans he’s sought and their links to Qatar and a third story about how special counsel Robert Mueller is now investigating those links. While no crimes have been proven, the stories of Kushner’s loans line up remarkably well with one of the Steele dossier’s core allegations of Russian bribery. According to a report by NBC News on Friday, these dealings are also now a key line of inquiry for Mueller’s probe into Russia’s interference in our presidential election.
Kushner is currently facing potentially massive ramifications for a disastrous $1.8 billion real estate deal he struck a decade ago. The slew of new stories suggest that he may have orchestrated a foreign policy crisis to pressure Qatar to bail him out. Months later, a firm linked to Qatar gave him a staggeringly large loan. All of these events suggest how Russia might have delivered a possible quid—a potential payment from a huge oil sale through back channels—in return for a Trump administration quo—a reported promise of reduced sanctions.

A Qatari fund acquires major assets from Russia. Kushner’s business seeks money directly from Qatar. The nation, though, does not deliver to Kushner. The U.S. changes its political posture against Qatar at Kushner’s urging, with the alarming possibility that the seemingly manufactured conflict could have escalated into war. (Fortunately, it did not.) Several months later, the Qatar-backed Apollo Group delivers $184 million to Kushner.

All of this should be considered an incredible scandal in its own right, worthy of serious congressional inquiry. Once you factor in, however, the portions of this that are consistent with some of the allegations in the Steele dossier, the stories potentially become even more explosive.
The Steele dossier alleges that Russians made a deal with Carter Page in the summer of 2016 to sell 19 percent of fossil fuel giant Rosneft, a multibillion dollar deal, and secretly transfer benefits to Trump officials. The dossier alleged that Page was a campaign intermediary to meet personally with Russians, and that Igor Sechin—the CEO of Rosneft and a close Putin ally—and Page had held a “secret meeting” to discuss “the issues of future bilateral energy cooperation and prospects for an associated move to lift Ukraine-related western sanctions against Russia.” The dossier further alleged that Sechin offered Page the brokerage of a 19 percent stake in the company in exchange for the lifting of U.S. sanctions on Russia. Page has denied that this meeting with Sechin ever took place.
Page’s testimony before the House Intelligence Committee, however, confirmed that he at the very least discussed these general topics with key Russian figures at critical points in the Steele dossier timeline. For example, Page confirmed that he had spoken with Andrey Baranov, the head of investor relations at Rosneft and an employee of Sechin, when in Moscow in July 2016. He also acknowledged “briefly” discussing “a potential sale of a significant percentage of Rosneft” with Baranov. Finally, he would only say that he didn’t “directly” express support for the idea of lifting sanctions on Russia with Baranov.
Meanwhile, on Dec. 9, 2016, a month after the election, Russia made a deal with Qatar to sell 19.5 percent of Rosneft.

The Rosneft sale was right after Trump’s victory but before the inauguration. It was also right after Kushner’s push for a secret communications link to the Kremlin through the Russia embassy that U.S. intelligence couldn’t access, and right before Kushner’s meeting with Putin’s banker and confidant Gorkov.

Natasha Bertrand’s reporting on Page’s testimony lays out further how Page confirmed in his testimony some key elements of the dossier and demonstrated additional evidence for the dossier’s findings. Page, critically, had meetings with Rosneft officials in July 2016 in which those officials discussed both the massive sale of Rosneft and the Trump administration lifting sanctions on Russia. His testimony and his emails confirm that Page got advance approval from high-ranking Trump officials like Sam Clovis to go to Russia for that July trip, and he communicated with Trump officials immediately after the trip congratulating them for a stunning pro-Russia change in the Republican Party platform on Ukraine policy. Page then went back to Russia a day before the Rosneft megadeal was announced to meet with Rosneft executives, and then went to London to talk to Gazprom officials about new investment opportunities.
 

But, but, RUSSIA!

Sorry, not seeing it.

Kushner seeks a loan from Quatar. Quatar sez no way Jose. So Kushner changes his tune and urges the US to change it's relationship with Quatar.

Where's the "Russian collusion?" Quatar isn't Russia. Kushner isn't trying to get a loan from Russia. Oh wait, now I see it... Quatar has "Russian interests". Apparently that's close enough to the real thing to call it the same thing. Kinda like wanting 1 Ruffles potato chip is the same as eating a whole bag of Doritos. :rolleyes:
 
Comrade Brennan has long been a deep state lemming...

CIA Director Reveals He Was Once a Communist Sympathizer
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligence...eals-he-was-once-a-communist-sympathizer.html

2014
Obama should fire John Brennan
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...uld-fire-john-brennan/?utm_term=.7649ff4c51ed

CIA director John Brennan lied to you and to the Senate. Fire him
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jul/31/cia-director-john-brennan-lied-senate

The intelligence community keeps lying
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...g-steve-chapman-oped-080-20140807-column.html

2016
Brennan blatantly lies to the Senate
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4579950/brennan-blatantly-lies-senate

2017
Former CIA Director John Brennan Claims He Misspoke After Lying To Trey Gowdy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drwGrEh7npQ
 
Obama group selling White House access to rich donors, says watchdog

Nah... Nothing wrong Goin on.. :rolleyes:

Amurica!

https://www.yahoo.com/news/jared-kushner-apos-family-business-090635855.html

Jared Kushner's Family Business Was Loaned Hundreds Of Millions of Dollars After White House Meetings With Top Executives

Hey, Cowboy! You're the gift that keeps on giving!

A nonpartisan watchdog group on Tuesday demanded President Obama shut down the nonprofit group built from his campaign organization, the latest voice in a growing chorus accusing the newly founded Organizing for Action (OFA) of selling access to the White House.

“If President Obama is serious about his often-expressed desire to rein in big money in politics, he should shut down Organizing for Action and disavow any plan to schedule regular meetings with its major donors,” said Bob Edgar, president of Common Cause, in a statement. “Access to the President should never be for sale.”

Last week, the New York Times reported that the nonprofit group was offering donors access to quarterly meetings with Obama if they donated half a million dollars.
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brief...-house-access-to-wealthy-donors-says-watchdog
 
well, six, really. for a bit there his biggest issue was bluedog cowards who cost us universal healthcare because they were ascared of losing their cushy jobs.
 
well, six, really. for a bit there his biggest issue was bluedog cowards who cost us universal healthcare because they were ascared of losing their cushy jobs.

Not exactly. People forget how long it took Franken to be seated, and how sick Kennedy was among other things.

https://www.ohio.com/akron/pages/when-obama-had-total-control-of-congress

Did President Obama have “total control” of Congress? Yes, for 4 entire months. And it was during that very small time window that Obamacare was passed in the Senate with 60 all-Democratic votes.

Did President Obama have “total control’ of Congress during his first two years as president? Absolutely not and any assertions to the contrary…..as you can plainly see in the above chronology….is a lie.
 
Back
Top