Do you think Mueller should be fired?

Should Mueller be fired


  • Total voters
    109
Sure, if Trump wants to make himself look insanely guilty.

What's that line.... If he's got nothing to hide, then there shouldn't be a problem letting Mueller do his job.
 
Sure, if Trump wants to make himself look insanely guilty.

What's that line.... If he's got nothing to hide, then there shouldn't be a problem letting Mueller do his job.

Like he needs to fire Mueller to look insanely guilty.
 
Last edited:
It still needs a bit of elaboration. Maybe first thoughts are not the best thoughts. Maybe you should not treat this format as Twitter? "Insanely Guilty?" Isn't insanity a not-guilty plea?
 
It still needs a bit of elaboration. Maybe first thoughts are not the best thoughts. Maybe you should not treat this format as Twitter? "Insanely Guilty?" Isn't insanity a not-guilty plea?
That phrase is a colloquialism. It refers to the level of guilt, not to one's mental status.
 
It still needs a bit of elaboration. Maybe first thoughts are not the best thoughts. Maybe you should not treat this format as Twitter? "Insanely Guilty?" Isn't insanity a not-guilty plea?

Tell me again, doofus, what does ∀ mean, and how is it used? :rolleyes:
 
He has a well recognized conflict of interest.

In reality, he should, under legal canons, resign.
You cite opinions, not facts.

Try some facts. Mueller is a Gup. He was appointed to head FBI by a Gup. He was appointed special prosecutor by a Gup. His 'conflicts' are bogus.

For conflicts of interest, consider 'justices' Scalia and Thomas, both of whose close kin, as officers in Bush campaign committees, were parties in Bush v Gore. Both 'justices' should have recused themselves. Instead, they installed Dubya. That didn't go well.
 
If so, then why?

Because his investigation is tainted with partisanship. For example, only when forced by leaks did he remove SA Strzok from the investigation. It is highly unusual for there to be a special investigation when no crime has been established. Mueller has stonewalled Congress- I’m not saying all information should be made public just now, but I don’t think Mueller can ignore requests from Congress for information that is pertinent to their own probes. Yes, I realize that formally he is not the one denying Congressional requests for information

Moreover, as a former FBI director, Mueller has a built in conflict of interest- I think he wants to protect his former agency.

Actually, given the brouhaha that would ensue if Trump were to fire Mueller, the best thing would be for Mueller to step down in favor of a lead whose impartiality is more credible. But, if Mueller has illegally obtained emails and documents about Trump's transition team. then he should be fired. To the best of my knowledge, it is not clear whether or not he has done so.
 
Last edited:
Because his investigation is tainted with partisanship. For example, only when forced by leaks did he remove SA Strzok from the investigation.

Well, no. The removal from the investigation (he wasn't fired) came before the leaks. And the leaks weren't, for a couple of months, able to say why he was fired.

Back up your claim with source citations on the timing of both the leaks and the firing. I remember the leak reporting, and it came after he was removed. Mueller, a Republican, hired by a Republican, in a Republican administration, with the Republican FBI Director a contributor to the Trump campaign to the tune of $30,000 (chaw on the two-faced smear campaign you are promoting here) removed him immediately (for e-mail blasts at Trump and Clinton alike). With everyone in the world telling Trump that Flynn was owned, not only by the Russians but by the Turks as well, nothing happened for twenty days.

What this points to is a tight lid on leaks, which I know frustrates the hell of folks here who then zip ahead to claim it means there is no evidence of wrong doing (in an investigation that has already netted an indictment of a campaign manager and a deputy campaign manager and plea deal [meaning conviction] on preliminary issues of a national security advisor.)

But just keep going with your deflections and distractions. They don't mean shit in what actually is going to happen. It just means that you see the noose tightening. It might be a good time to just shut up and pretend you knew all along that the Trump administration is up to its neck (several of them, a few with the name Trump) in being owned by the Russians.
 
Last edited:
Money Money Money.

Whenever political corruption is suspected there are three cardinal rules:-

1. Follow the money.

2. Follow the money.

3. Follow the money.

That is what Meuller is doing. Money is the DNA of political/financial crime; it always leaves a trail, a documented trail, and documents are hard evidence. It may take time but Meuller knows what he is doing.

Meanwhile we can speculate to our heart's content. :D
 
The money is also Trump's downfall with Russian involvement. It's been well established they control his outstanding loans to the tune of billions. It doesn't take a genius to figure this out.
 
Just a reminder for Trompniks: If the Deep State, supposedly including FBI monster Mueller, really had it in for Tromp, the Nice Clean Hit would already have occurred. Instead of searching financials, Deep State fiends would have manufactured sufficient 'evidence' to repopulate the Executive Branch with whomever they prefer.

That ain't happened. Thus, either:

* The Deep State is totally incompetent. OR
* The Deep State has reasons to retain Tromp. OR
* Mueller is not part of the Deep State conspiracy. OR
* There ain't no Deep State, Mueller is honest, and Tromp is cooked.
 
Back
Top