Do you own your body?

How exactly would the documents come to light? HIPPA violations? What a dumb question.

Does anyone honestly think he would care if they were documented? And if he said he cared, does anyone really think he'd do anything differently?

He - just like all the other anti abortion fanatics - is a hypocritical dishonest zealot.
 
Does anyone honestly think he would care if they were documented? And if he said he cared, does anyone really think he'd do anything differently?

He - just like all the other anti abortion fanatics - is a hypocritical dishonest zealot.
He thinks women purposely got cancer so they had access to abortion drugs.
 
How exactly would the documents come to light? HIPPA violations? What a dumb question.
Individuals allegedly “reported” that they were denied the medication. Who are they, and who did they “report” to? Two organizations claim they are aware of these “reports.” HIPPA doesn’t prohibit people from publicly discussing their medical histories.
 
The hilarious thing is this is the same lying POS that believes women abort at 8.5 months for "convenience".
 
Then how else would the documents come to light? By women telling their truths, that's how. Fuck, it's too early for your brand of stupidity.
Exactly. Women can simply “tell their truths” as legions of them have been doing with regard to abortion issues over the past 50 years or more. So far, you and I are unable to identify a single woman who claims to have been denied this medication as a result of an abortion law. All I’ve seen is a tweet referencing a story that references two organizations that claim to be “aware of reports” and “concerns.”
 
Exactly. Women can simply “tell their truths” as legions of them have been doing with regard to abortion issues over the past 50 years or more. So far, you and I are unable to identify a single woman who claims to have been denied this medication as a result of an abortion law. All I’ve seen is a tweet referencing a story that references two organizations that claim to be “aware of reports” and “concerns.”
He asked "how else would it come to light" and your response is this?
 
All I’ve seen is a tweet referencing a story that references two organizations that claim to be “aware of reports” and “concerns.”
Funny how when I searched, I found four women who allowed their names, and several organisations, all reporting on the current issue. But you...nope can't find anything......why?
 
https://www.arthritis.org/about-us/news-and-updates/statement-on-methotrexate-access
GHLF
The Lupus Foundation
American College of Rehumotology

Four in a quick search all showing reports of people stating they have been denied, or were at first denied, but then later received a re-fill.

But Boomer can't seem to find this information.....*chuckles*

Why
WE
KNOW
WHY
Thank you for confirming my point. This Arthritis organization is unable to identify anyone either and has issued a request asking people to let them know if they have been denied access due to the SCOTUS ruling on Dobbs. We still don’t know of any women this has happened to.

Pro tip: Next time read articles before posting links.
 
Funny how when I searched, I found four women who allowed their names, and several organisations, all reporting on the current issue. But you...nope can't find anything......why?
That’s all I’m asking for. Specific cases. If you can share the names of the women and any supporting information that might substantiate that their medication is being denied due to the Dobbs ruling, please share. Thanks.
 
Thank you for confirming my point. This Arthritis organization is unable to identify anyone either and has issued a request asking people to let them know if they have been denied access due to the SCOTUS ruling on Dobbs. We still don’t know of any women this has happened to.

Pro tip: Next time read articles before posting links.
If you do a quick search you can find the article by the Arthritis organisation, not just their statement...but apparently your incapable of using google at the moment.....
Pro tip......research your answer first.......(I know you'd be dumb enough to look and not follow up).

I put up four names and only one link.......and he bit hook line and sinker....
https://www.arthritis.org/about-us/...arrier-to-methotrexate-for-arthritis-patients
 
I find it very interesting that no one has affirmatively said "I own my own body and so does everyone else!" and that's the end of it.

That's telling in and of itself.

Oh, I think that your statement was mostly true 3 months ago in the US. Not so now, thanks to Dobbs v JWHO. And so many people are lost in this abortion issue that they refuse to even consider there was an application to their own life, regardless of their reproductive status in this ruling, in this debate.

The concept of white privilege is supremely touchy because people who have it don't like to acknowledge that they have it, they don't like to see that they are anything other than average. They like to beleive or arguably pretend that everyone else enjoys what they do, because then they are retreat back to their fantasy that they are underdogs or martyrs or put-upon by what they consider to be wrongs against them.

Same thing is happening here for anyone who beleives restricting abortion is the right thing to do and who hasn't adopted a kid or taken a foster into their home. Do as I say, not as I do. And that privledge kicks in the first time they attempt to turn down or rebuff someone else taking control of their body.

Let's just reference the mask controversy. Same concept, even though so many who are anti-abortion are also anti-mask.

A country full of self-righteous hypocrites.

And everyone who likes their privacy but didn't vote for it, or didn't vote at all - oh well...
 
That’s all I’m asking for. Specific cases. If you can share the names of the women and any supporting information that might substantiate that their medication is being denied due to the Dobbs ruling, please share. Thanks.
No, according to the rules around here, I don't have to put up links to back my statements, just ask dmonty, or rightguide or a slew of other dumb fuck Americans hanging out on these board. You have proven your misogyny over abortion time and again, So fuck off.
 
I read four articles based upon four different women, ( though one woman is really "out there" so to speak), on one simple google search, dumbass Boomer can't or refuses to even look......he's just becoming a fuck twad these days....
 
The hilarious thing is this is the same lying POS that believes women abort at 8.5 months for "convenience".
I don’t think I said 8.5 months but very likely did say that late term abortion, defined as 21 weeks by the CDC, is not uncommon in the US. The abortion rights Guttmacher Institute estimates about 15,000 terminations per year fall into this category, and says that “data suggests that most women seeking later terminations are not doing so for reasons of fetal anomaly or life endangerment.”
 
Maybe I missed it. The only link I saw from you was the arthritis organization. No names or cases.
 
Back
Top