BabyBoomer50s
Capitalist
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2018
- Posts
- 14,228
Yes, I concede the hysteria around contraceptives is stupid as was the bill.Exactly.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, I concede the hysteria around contraceptives is stupid as was the bill.Exactly.
The one you just said you don’t know or care about?Yes, I concede the hysteria around contraceptives is stupid as was the bill.
Yes, I don’t know or care who voted for or against it. If you’re having trouble finding contraceptives, you don’t need to go to the dark web. Try CVS or Walgreens.The one you just said you don’t know or care about?
For now, yes.Yes, I don’t know or care who voted for or against it. If you’re having trouble finding contraceptives, you don’t need to go to the dark web. Try CVS or Walgreens.
Their concern is for the life of the father’s sperm, ergo pro-jizz.I agree, which is why I always say "anti-choice" or "pro-forced-birth". "Pro-Life" is both inaccurate and offensive to those of us who respect a woman's right to make her own decisions about her own life. (It does have the added benefit of really pissing them off, but that's not actually why I do it.)
The vote was 228 in favor (all Dems and 8 Reps) and 195 against "Right To Contraception" legislation. The "right to contraception" as it stands right now is the result of three Supreme Court precedents (right to contraception itself, right to purchase contraception out of wedlock, and right for minors to purchase contraception). As last year's Extreme Court showed, "stare decisis" and "precedents" were 'advisory in nature only' and "Justice" Alito in particular looks askance at precedent. "Justice" Thomas invited states to ban contraception, and four states already have banned all prescription contraception for Medicaid recipients.Don’t know, don’t care. Nonsensical bill. Contraceptives are not being banned and are widely available.
The vote was 228 in favor (all Dems and 8 Reps) and 195 against "Right To Contraception" legislation. The "right to contraception" as it stands right now is the result of three Supreme Court precedents (right to contraception itself, right to purchase contraception out of wedlock, and right for minors to purchase contraception). As last year's Extreme Court showed, "stare decisis" and "precedents" were 'advisory in nature only' and "Justice" Alito in particular looks askance at precedent. "Justice" Thomas invited states to ban contraception, and four states already have banned all prescription contraception for Medicaid recipients.
Link to legislation proposal and roll call vote
The woman who proposed this obviously wants to control other women’s bodies. Men in the MO legislature have even less control over their own bodies.
Government small enough to fit inside of a uterus.House Republicans are taking early action on abortion with their new majority, approving two measures Wednesday that make clear they want further restraints after the Supreme Court overruled the federal right to abortion last year.
Except if you're a person who needs an abortion. Then you're an acceptable casualty.“You don’t have freedom, true liberty, unless government protects your most fundamental right, your right to live,” said new House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, who led debate on the measures.
Starting Tuesday, access to reproductive health care is likely to command fresh scrutiny before the Republican-controlled Texas Capitol, where new restrictions are on the table in the first session since a stringent statewide abortion ban took effect.
https://apnews.com/article/abortion...tates-senate-cb608d31f591fd06ec2fd753f122f6cb
Government small enough to fit inside of a uterus.
Except if you're a person who needs an abortion. Then you're an acceptable casualty.
https://apnews.com/article/abortion...e-government-7ba70ebde39cb2d992eeb7e5f32603ca
More GOP obsessions.
Anyone who tries to deny, defend or rationalize this bullshit is a liar and an idiot.
The back story to this kerfluffle is amusing. This whole episode is the result of the (unelected) clerk of the Missouri legislature who was quite upset with elected representatives who were women of color wearing designer clothes that cost more than he earned in a month in the House chamber.,The woman who proposed this obviously wants to control other women’s bodies. Men in the MO legislature have even less control over their own bodies.
“Proper attire for gentlemen shall be business attire, including coat, tie, dress trousers, and dress shoes or boots,”
Everyone in the legislature should have the right to bare arms.
https://www.mprnews.org/story/2023/...rantee-abortion-rights-sends-bill-to-governor
In Minnesota, the answer is yes.
Abortion doesn't involve babies.Minnesota will now become a baby killing factory, you lefty loons have much to be proud of. So much for babies in the third trimester being protected under the constitution. SAD!
Keep telling yourself that!Abortion doesn't involve babies.
Nothing will change in Minnesota except women won't be prosecuted for making medical decisions about their own bodies.
I don't need to tell myself anything. I just understand facts.Keep telling yourself that!
As opposed to any large gathering and a nut job with a gun? So worried about life eh? That’s more SAD.Minnesota will now become a baby killing factory, you lefty loons have much to be proud of. So much for babies in the third trimester being protected under the constitution. SAD!
An abortion doesn't involve a baby.https://abort73.com/abortion/abortion_and_the_hippocratic_oath/
"The modern updated version of the Hippocratic Oath without referencing abortion directly, the doctors who take this oath—if they're honest—are still committing themselves to the preservation of human life, which traces all the way back to conception. The fact that countless abortionists have blithely bound themselves to this oath doesn't negate its original intent. We can change the language of historic moral documents—to accommodate an ethically-suspect practice, but we can’t change the morality itself. Simply put, killing an innocent human being is not a morally-acceptable cure to unwanted pregnancy".
Fetuses are not human beings in any sense of the word, how many times have you been told this? Yet you still don't understand...fucking dumbass American!https://abort73.com/abortion/abortion_and_the_hippocratic_oath/
"The modern updated version of the Hippocratic Oath without referencing abortion directly, the doctors who take this oath—if they're honest—are still committing themselves to the preservation of human life, which traces all the way back to conception. The fact that countless abortionists have blithely bound themselves to this oath doesn't negate its original intent. We can change the language of historic moral documents—to accommodate an ethically-suspect practice, but we can’t change the morality itself. Simply put, killing an innocent human being is not a morally-acceptable cure to unwanted pregnancy".
Minnesota will now become a baby killing factory, you lefty loons have much to be proud of. So much for babies in the third trimester being protected under the constitution. SAD!