Do you DACA?

[bellisarius]

It looks like congress doesn't.

 

[Que]

Democrats would far rather have it as a wedge than a law. Same thing as with gun control; they don't actually want gun control that would cost them seats what they want is the ability to scream that Republicans don't care about dead children or dreamers.

The most important thing to any politician is to stay in office or get in office so they can get on the gravy train. It's no accident that Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi went to Congress broke and are leaving multi-millionares.

 

[WoundedKnee]

Thise precious, helpless "children," some of whom are serving in our military as child soldiers, are nothing more than pawns to the Democrats as were the 17 bodies that they gleefully turned into a soapbox.

 

[bellisarius]

Shhhhhhhhhh, I'm fishing for trolls.

 

[WoundedKnee]

Some would say you've already hooked two.

 

[about_average]

Thise precious, helpless "children," some of whom are serving in our military as child soldiers, are nothing more than pawns to the Democrats as were the 17 bodies that they gleefully turned into a soapbox.

Does it bother you when Trump turns mass shootings in to a soapbox?
Or turns a train wreck in to a soapbox?
Or turns a person intentionally driving in to a crowd in to a soapbox?

If it does then I'm sure you can quote other posts where you said that.

 

[WoundedKnee]

It is the President's actual fucking job to make a comment on an tragic national event, had he not, you would be screaming bloody murder over his lack of empathy. Furthermore he is stepping up and answering the overwhelming clarion call to "do something."
It seems to be the purview of the SJW to run screaming to the microphone and start attacking the AR, the NRA, conservatives, Republicans, demanding really simple and draconian solutions, engaging in post hoc ergo propter hoc without waiting a brief heartbeat in grief for the victims, because "you never let a crises go to waste."

 

[where_is_RUTH]

It is the President's actual fucking job to make a comment on an tragic national event, had he not, you would be screaming bloody murder over his lack of empathy. Furthermore he is stepping up and answering the overwhelming clarion call to "do something."
It seems to be the purview of the SJW to run screaming to the microphone and start attacking the AR, the NRA, conservatives, Republicans, demanding really simple and draconian solutions, engaging in post hoc ergo propter hoc without waiting a brief heartbeat in grief for the victims, because "you never let a crises go to waste."

Hey I'm British so "wadda I Know"
Didn't Trump say he'd go up against a guy with a gun by running into a building without a gun? so sometimes the 'doing something' is pretty stupid.

but we can all have an off day!

 

[WoundedKnee]

Why would he need a gun? He would be in a phalanx of Secret Service, men and women who will throw themselves into the breach and have proven it time and time again.

 

[about_average]

It is the President's actual fucking job to make a comment on an tragic national event, had he not, you would be screaming bloody murder over his lack of empathy. Furthermore he is stepping up and answering the overwhelming clarion call to "do something."

ok, if it's fine for Trump to "gleefully" jump on a soap box, why is it wrong for dems to?

Why would he need a gun? He would be in a phalanx of Secret Service, men and women who will throw themselves into the breach and have proven it time and time again.

Oh yeah, that's exactly what he was saying.

If he were in your scenario, he wouldn't have to repeat his draft dodging efforts, his detail would physically restrain him from rushing in.

 

[Que]

https://www.snopes.com/trump-stops-mugging-1991/

Typical Snopes. This was actually published in the paper, not disputed at the time and included witnesses to the event and they say it is "unproven" because of Trump's history of self-aggrandizement.

Snopes has gotten decidedly more partisan after he dumped the wife and included the girlfriend in the "research" team.

I'm pretty impressed with his moxie. A partisan hack with a laptop and Google is often cited as the arbiter of truth on any given subject.

 

[Rightguide]

Does it bother you when Trump turns mass shootings in to a soapbox?
Or turns a train wreck in to a soapbox?
Or turns a person intentionally driving in to a crowd in to a soapbox?

If it does then I'm sure you can quote other posts where you said that.

You ever ask yourself if your hallucinations about life and reality bothers anyone?

 

[HisArpy]

Hey I'm British so "wadda I Know"
Didn't Trump say he'd go up against a guy with a gun by running into a building without a gun? so sometimes the 'doing something' is pretty stupid.

but we can all have an off day!

The ability to "do something" isn't the criteria. It's the desire to actually get off your ass and TRY that defines courage and backbone.

Not everyone has the opportunity to BE "that guy". But when it happens, most people just stand and watch with drool running down their chins. Trump has a history of being "that guy". Meanwhile YOU post things on a porn board...

At least you ain't French so there's some hope for you.

 

[Captainnumnuts]

Shhhhhhhhhh, I'm fishing for trolls.

Have you found any Trojans? This place is fool of them.

 

[WoundedKnee]

ok, if it's fine for Trump to "gleefully" jump on a soap box, why is it wrong for dems to?

Oh yeah, that's exactly what he was saying.

If he were in your scenario, he wouldn't have to repeat his draft dodging efforts, his detail would physically restrain him from rushing in.

I already answered that in full. I see you didn't like the answer. So be it. Trump spoke to the victims, the Democrats used them, much like the DACA children, as pawns in a myopic crusade that can only be achieved if they can catch a nation off-guard with pure emotion. It's a good thing the political system is rigged against acting out of knee-jerk emotion.

 

[about_average]

https://www.snopes.com/trump-stops-mugging-1991/

Typical Snopes. This was actually published in the paper, not disputed at the time and included witnesses to the event and they say it is "unproven" because of Trump's history of self-aggrandizement.

Snopes has gotten decidedly more partisan after he dumped the wife and included the girlfriend in the "research" team.

I'm pretty impressed with his moxie. A partisan hack with a laptop and Google is often cited as the arbiter of truth on any given subject.

If you bothered to actually read, the only witness identified said he just got out of his limo to see what was happening then got back in.

An unidentified witness said Trump came to the rescue. Trump has a documented history of calling newspapers and radio shows pretending to be someone else and claiming great things about Trump.
So yeah, could be true, but no real proof = unverified.

You ever ask yourself if your hallucinations about life and reality bothers anyone?

Trump's tweets aren't real?

Wait till you're not high or drunk before you post.

 

[about_average]

I already answered that in full. I see you didn't like the answer.

No you didn't, you deflected and didn't answer my question.

Let's try again.
If it's ok for Trump to use tragedies for political gain (which he has on numerous occasions), why is it not ok for dems to?

 

[WoundedKnee]

Let's not try again. I answered the question, in full before your "challenge" post. If you are too opinionated to understand that, then I'm done with you on this issue.