Do you consider yourself a "real" writer?

KillerMuffin

Seraphically Disinclined
Joined
Jul 29, 2000
Posts
25,603
Why or why not? If not, what would it take for you to become a "real" writer?
 
No, I'm afraid not. My interests and talents are in areas far removed from creative writing. I guess I'll always be an interested dabbler.
MG
 
Yes, although I'm afraid to own up to the term in a "if I pretend it doesn't mean so much to me, then it won't hurt so much when I fail" way. I just have to remember how I feel when I'm creating and reading over what I've made, and then there is no doubt.
 
Yes, I am a "real" writer. Because I choose to be a writer and I put continual effort into being one. I think the "real" part is the effort to learn more about the craft and hopefully get better at it.



Omni :rose:
 
Yes. After two fantasy trilogies, a horror novel, a kids' book, and a few short story sales, I guess I'd better ;) Not counting tons of fanfic and naughtiness for this site!

Sabledrake
 
I write because little stories build up in my head to a point where it is best to write them out. Since I lack any actual writing ability and do not stand to make anything from my scribbles, I do not consider myself an author. :cool:
 
All right, already! I'm DYING for someone to ask what is considered a "real" writer? Is it something you've done all (or most) of your life, is it being paid for your work, or is it just a desire to perfect your craft?
 
No, I think of myself as an aspiring writer. When I can rack up a few more rejections, then I'll be a "real" writer.
 
Violette...

I believe you can get paid to write, do it all your life and still not be a "real" scribe. I'm a prime example; writing pays my bills, shocking as that might sound. Of course, if you've read my Lit work you know I ain't cashing checks with erotica. I'm more of a journalist than a writer, but I don't consider myself much of either. Allow me to quote the noted humanitarian Bobby Knight: "Most of us learn to write in about the second or third grade and move on." I guess I just never moved on. (See, there I go ending a sentence with a preposition. What kind of "real" writer does that?)
 
Money

I will consider myself a real writer the second I manage to get someone to give me money for my writing, even if I never do again. Until then I'm a writer in training.

Being a real writer doesn't necessarily mean being a good one, as th above post suggests. Although I am unhappy at present with even my best work, I am already confident that I am better than some I have read which make millions.
 
You know, there are plenty of artists who also have to work (something that pays the bills) in order to eat. I don't know of a single one who doesn't consider his/herself an artist.

I think the problem some of us have is due to the genre. I for one don't. Thousands and thousands of people have read and enjoyed my stories. Most have been moved to a physical reaction (bad or good) from my words. I received more letters than I can count. What more does it take?

I am a writer.
 
I consider myself a "real" writer. I'm certainly not a professional. Writing is a hobby for me for now. But it doesn't mean I'm not a "real" writer. I think some of my writing is "better" than some professionals. I devote a significant amount of time to writing and developing my skills. I'm open to constructive criticism and learning new things. I love writing and obtain great satisfaction from it. I enjoy thinking up new plots and ideas for stories. I like trying different writing styles at times. I enjoy collaborating with other authors to improve my skills, and to share my own ideas.

I look at it this way. Professional baseball players are paid to practice and play in games during an established season. College baseball players are not paid to practice and play in games during an established season. Does that mean college baseball players are not "real" players? Hardly. They devote a significant amount of time to the game, just as professionals do. Professionals are constantly in training, just as college players.

I'm not sure what you intend to mean by "real", but that's how I view being a "real" writer.
 
I am a writer, because i write and let others see my writings, i don't think i am an author,that to me is something professional and published!
 
KillerMuffin said:
Why or why not? If not, what would it take for you to become a "real" writer?


Hmmm... the word "Hack" comes to mind ;)
 
I do consider myself a "real" writer. I write, almost every day, and I produce work, generally of good (occasionally even high) quality.

On the other hand, I am only starting to consider myself to be a professional writer. I have had a story accepted for publication in a webzine for September. On the other hand, I'm not being paid for it, so I'm not sure if it counts as a first professional sale/ or acceptance. But it gives me a boost to encourage me to keep trying to sell my work rather than just write and keep it all a secret
 
Re. the question and its ill use of a word like "real", well frankly it would never occur to me to think about the notion let alone reply earnestly.

maladroitly (which is to say gauchely),

Perdita
 
As I am honest with myself when I'm writing, I consider myself a "real" writer,
I'm just not a professional/published author.
yet
 
I think Mona has the correct take on most of us. Writers, yes: authors, no.

I fantasize sex encounters for personal relief. Some of the fantasies have been typed into my word-processor. A few of those have been submitted to LIT. One was traded for s months membership at another site several years ago. So yes, technically I have been payed for my scribbles.

I do not however consider myself as an author.
 
Being a writer is a state of mind. Being literate doesn't count, publishing doesn't count, getting paid doesn't count, magizine subscribtions and the number of hours you spend on it doesn't count either. Having or not having teqnical skills isn't it either. Just writing something people read doesn't neccesarily make you a writer- lots of people write letters but they aren't all writers. I don't even think that letting others read what you write is necessariy important. I don't think emily dickenson showed her poems to anyone while she was alive, she was a major hermit.

What makes you a 'real' writer is when writing is something you do that is a part of who you are. Some people post stories for kicks until the thrill runs out. Some people write stuff because it's there job and it pays the bills. Some people right because they have a story to tell. Writers can write for all these reasons, but there's always a part of them that writes to write. Sometimes they love it, sometimes they hate it, but they can't imagine life without it.

They may not be able to articulate all of this but they know in their hearts that they are "writer's." So when a person says that they are or are not a "real writer" I take them at there word, because I think only you can decide that for yourself. Only you know if the reason you write is because you can, or because you must.

As for me, I am a writer.
 
Here in the UK there are different professional organizations depending on who you think you are: the Society of Authors, and the Writers Guild.

Myself, I'm a Writers Guild man, not because I think being an 'author' is beyond me, but because I dislike the snobbery associated with the term. Which could, of course, be some sort of inverted snobbery. Heck, us Brits are so class-conscious.

As for being a 'real' writer or not, I tend to apply that to other people, not to myself. Usually with irony. Usually I accuse someone of not being a real writer when I feel they don't care about the shapes of words, sentences and speeches.

:)

patrick
 
I'm not a writer yet. I'm reasonably skilled at getting two characters to have sex and fairly good at describing it. In my mind I'll only be an author when I finish a story that isn't just a pathway to sex.

On a side-note a big GBHLCS to Jan, who has inspired me to struggle on with my best piece of non-erotic. She won't ever read this, but it makes me feel better to say it.

The Earl
 
KillerMuffin said:
Why or why not? If not, what would it take for you to become a "real" writer?

A post graduate course in English, and a freekin miracle love.
 
Pops:

What about some special tutoring? Private like.

Perdita Darling :kiss:
 
Back
Top