Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looks like there was a sweep.
Wrong Prescription for Mom lost about 200 votes and the score went from 3.84 to 4.04.
April Fool's results were supposed to be today, so that's probably why there's a step up in sweeps, in addition to the other reasons.
I’m pretty sure Shakespeare misquoted the Shakespeares he sometimes stole from, so it’s morally fine.
I haven't seen changes in my catalog, but the contest scores are changing. I don't know how often the bio pages are updated (that's where I get the scores), but they have been updated at least a couple times today. The median score has gone from 4.26 to 4.33 in the last update, and there were twelve stories with scores of 4.50 or more, compared to 9 earlier this morning.
Also, the new story page isn't working on my iPad pro. I can't vote, text overlaps, and I can only get to the next chapter by going back to the author's list of works.

Sorry about the issue.
I am testing on an iPad Pro with the latest Safari right now, can you let me know what browser you are using? I can't replicate the issue, but there are a lot of variables, so any additional info would be appreciated.
Thank you!![]()
The issue may not have been resolved. Today one of my stories lost three votes, and another lost two. All of the lost votes are 5*s. There had been no voting or other acti ity on these stories for more than a month.
I think the sweeps are cutting deeper. My top ten stories are mostly older - they've all changed their ranking between .01 and .05 (not much in the grand scheme of things) and maybe lost a vote or two (again, not much). It's pretty clear to me (having watched sweeps since they started) that the site has somehow tightened its vote validation criteria recently, and has purged a bunch of votes.I've notice a couple of vote drops, but only a couple. I had thought it was one of the routine sweeps the site does.
If the vote losses are all from legitimate sweeps, then so be it. If the system is indeed functioning exactly as it should, then I’d join in a collective sigh of relief and have no further concerns about submitting new stories, knowing that the ratings they get would arise from true votes. At this stage, however, I’m not confident about the system’s functioning.I think the sweeps are cutting deeper. My top ten stories are mostly older - they've all changed their ranking between .01 and .05 (not much in the grand scheme of things) and maybe lost a vote or two (again, not much). It's pretty clear to me (having watched sweeps since they started) that the site has somehow tightened its vote validation criteria recently, and has purged a bunch of votes.
What amuses me is the number of people who are assuming their votes were always legit and want them all "restored". Probably not.
What amuses me is the number of people who are assuming their votes were always legit and want them all "restored". Probably not.
As long as any change in scoring affects all of us, then there is, objectively speaking, no problem.
Right.
People assume that all the 5s are legit and the 1s are not.
But there's no reason at all, objectively, to believe that's true. A 1 vote can be perfectly legitimate.
We've all been spoiled by a system that is skewed because of the nature of the voting system and the role of the 4.5/red H score, which alters voting behavior. It's possible there's been an influx of new voters that are less familiar with, and perhaps less influenced by, that system.
As long as any change in scoring affects all of us, then there is, objectively speaking, no problem.