Did vette out himself?

Did Vette out his alt in post #4?

  • Yes, he slipped out of the closet

    Votes: 36 83.7%
  • No, just his typical posting while under the influence

    Votes: 7 16.3%

  • Total voters
    43
I'm always amazed how the left, being totally apathetic towards the implications of Marbury v Madison, are totally unconcerned as well that 9 un-elected people, with lifetime tenure, have the power to overthrow the executive, the Congress, and the civil society, while pretending our freedom isn't threatened by that fact.

Except in our history, the executive and legislative branches have behaved worse than our judiciary. If anything the judiciary has been the protector of freedom.

Yes the potential for abuse is there, but the potential for abuse is possible from any of the three branches.
 
Three years ago I had a lot more respect for you than I do now. I never attacked your gay lifestyle, it didn't matter to me. Back then you were a gay man with interesting things to say, your sexuality never mattered. You were honest and demonstrated personal integrity. I don't recall ever judging any other aspects of your posting style.

You speak of my anger as if I hadn't been on the receiving end of it from certain people since the day I arrived here. I am attacked daily for my political beliefs and I answer in kind. I'm attacked for having the same beliefs about free speech as the owner of this board, yet you choose to attack me for "the lowlifes you associate with." I don't "associate" with anyone here, I post in the same threads they do, just like you. According to you, I'm guilty by association, tar brushed not because of what I say, but for what others say, as if they were my words. I don't defend how people say what they believe, only that they have the right to do so. Is Laurel a bigot, misogynist, or hateful, for tolerating such posts here on Lit?

There was a time when you were a gay "man," a fair man, instead of a juvenile thread Nazi running around trying to control how, when, where, and with whom people post. I have news for you, I'm not going to change the way I do things around here. I'm not going to surrender my beliefs, nor am I going to shrink from personal attacks, it's not in my DNA. So, I suspect you ought to think about putting me on IGGY.

You've been attacked for your beliefs since day one?

http://media.giphy.com/media/M7QQEilMY5904/giphy.gif

OH REALLY?

Bitch, please. You do nothing but attack other people's beliefs FIRST.

I can't even recall a day on here that you haven't been bitching about liberals and liberalism. Pissing, whining, crying, ALL THE FUCKING TIME. Like that water pistol you keep close to your ass cheeks was pressed to your temple and put you in a permanent state of misery.

If you hate liberals and liberalism so fucking much, then why are you even fucking here? Because you're pressed, that's why. This is forever all the argument I will ever need against you.

By the way, contrary to what you may believe, I don't hate you. In fact, I like you.

But see...I like you because I like seeing you fuck up. And I wanna keep seeing you fuck up. I wanna see the end result of your breakdown. I wanna see your ultimate Super Saiyan fuck up form, when you start chasing Shelly Duvall around the hotel with an axe. So please, do keep on being a miserable asshole on here who associates and dick-rides with likewise assorted assholes, sexless limpdicks, racist shitstains and aging conservative curmudgeons who wouldn't take a bullet for your ass if it came down to standing up for your right to live.

http://i.minus.com/ifDQILWRytszm.gif

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lpbxj1hayi1r0zbwoo1_400.gif

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_md4saem99e1rpr1t4.gif
 
Except in our history, the executive and legislative branches have behaved worse than our judiciary. If anything the judiciary has been the protector of freedom.

Yes the potential for abuse is there, but the potential for abuse is possible from any of the three branches.

Vette's just chomping at the bit for the legislature to interpret the second amendment and to limit campaign donations again.
 
I'm always amazed how the left, being totally apathetic towards the implications of Marbury v Madison, are totally unconcerned as well that 9 un-elected people, with lifetime tenure, have the power to overthrow the executive, the Congress, and the civil society, while pretending our freedom isn't threatened by that fact.

The Left hates juries, too. But the Left is always on the wrong side of history and everything.
 
If people like bry1313 and about_average could refrain from engaging either, perhaps he'll dig up another crusty wadded up sock from underneath his mattress and have a threesome with himself.
Well, Vette said many posts back that if I didn't answer his question he'd put me back on iggy.
It never occurred to me he was one for idle threats.
I've no excuse for replying to JBJ's nonsense.
 
They love to have judges running the country, they've got slavery and communism in their fucking DNA.:D

How many times are you going to respond to that same post, bub?

It's only been 14 minutes since the last time.
 
Wow, such a lot of bandwidth spilled over two (or maybe one) worthless pieces of dross. While I admit to a TOS (touch of schadenfreude) when I first read the accusation, I'm certainly not going to go through this whole thread.
 
Wow, such a lot of bandwidth spilled over two (or maybe one) worthless pieces of dross. While I admit to a TOS (touch of schadenfreude) when I first read the accusation, I'm certainly not going to go through this whole thread.
I started the thread and I can assure you it's not worth it. I figured it would die out after about 10 posts. Who knew?
 
Did Vette out himself? I honestly don't care. It's not possible for me to think any less of that hypocrite. This is the only comment I'm making on the matter.

Peace Out Homies :heart:
 
I started the thread and I can assure you it's not worth it. I figured it would die out after about 10 posts. Who knew?

You don't find the irony utilizing bandwidth to complain about bandwidth utilized?

In any event, kudos to you for this raucous thread.
 
Three years ago I had a lot more respect for you than I do now. I never attacked your gay lifestyle, it didn't matter to me. Back then you were a gay man with interesting things to say, your sexuality never mattered. You were honest and demonstrated personal integrity. I don't recall ever judging any other aspects of your posting style.

You speak of my anger as if I hadn't been on the receiving end of it from certain people since the day I arrived here. I am attacked daily for my political beliefs and I answer in kind. I'm attacked for having the same beliefs about free speech as the owner of this board, yet you choose to attack me for "the lowlifes you associate with." I don't "associate" with anyone here, I post in the same threads they do, just like you. According to you, I'm guilty by association, tar brushed not because of what I say, but for what others say, as if they were my words. I don't defend how people say what they believe, only that they have the right to do so. Is Laurel a bigot, misogynist, or hateful, for tolerating such posts here on Lit?

There was a time when you were a gay "man," a fair man, instead of a juvenile thread Nazi running around trying to control how, when, where, and with whom people post. I have news for you, I'm not going to change the way I do things around here. I'm not going to surrender my beliefs, nor am I going to shrink from personal attacks, it's not in my DNA. So, I suspect you ought to think about putting me on IGGY.


So, you believe that people have the right to say what they want to say, even if you don't agree with it, right? That seems fair.

So even if James is a big racist and says racist things, and you may not agree with his racism, you aren't going to confront him on it, because he has a right to say what he believes, yeah?

How come you're so willing to confront all the other people with whom you disagree, then?

I don't know why you aren't defending this thread, even. Doesn't aboveaverage have a right to say what he thinks...even if you don't agree with it? :confused:
 
oh, and also?

the difference between you and laurel is that while she respects the rights of people to say what they think, regardless of whether she agrees or disagrees - SHE HAS THE BALLS TO DISAGREE...even with people who might be her friends. unlike you.

she tolerates the racists because they have a right to their free speech - but at least she can admit that they're racists. unlike you.

there is a world of difference between you and laurel...even making the comparison is laughable. grow some integrity first, and then we'll see.
 
So, you believe that people have the right to say what they want to say, even if you don't agree with it, right? That seems fair.

So even if James is a big racist and says racist things, and you may not agree with his racism, you aren't going to confront him on it, because he has a right to say what he believes, yeah?

How come you're so willing to confront all the other people with whom you disagree, then?

I don't know why you aren't defending this thread, even. Doesn't aboveaverage have a right to say what he thinks...even if you don't agree with it? :confused:

What I like the most is how JBJ's (and Busybody's) blatant racism shits on all the people of color Vette served with in our armed forces. All those good men and women who bled and died for America and freedom and the red, white and blue. They all died for....this.

Semper fi.
 
Doesn't aboveaverage have a right to say what he thinks...even if you don't agree with it?
No, because I'm a fucking liar.
Or a lying rat-bastard...depending.

Oh, and I have it on good authority it's below_average.
 
So, you believe that people have the right to say what they want to say, even if you don't agree with it, right? That seems fair.

So even if James is a big racist and says racist things, and you may not agree with his racism, you aren't going to confront him on it, because he has a right to say what he believes, yeah?

How come you're so willing to confront all the other people with whom you disagree, then?

I don't know why you aren't defending this thread, even. Doesn't aboveaverage have a right to say what he thinks...even if you don't agree with it? :confused:

VETTEMAN prolly knows confronting me is a fools errand with no good end. It wont win him any friends from the Usual Suspects, and wont change my sentiments about the Negro race. Shit! I recognize the error of my ways and pray to Jesus every night to unleash hell on American negroes (but spare the rest).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What I like the most is how JBJ's (and Busybody's) blatant racism shits on all the people of color Vette served with in our armed forces. All those good men and women who bled and died for America and freedom and the red, white and blue. They all died for....this.

Semper fi.

Vetty's racism is a bit different from the racism of the Usual Suspects around here. He's bellowed loud and long that he can't be racist because he has a number of colored friends.

His hatred for all things Hispanic and Arabic is legendary, though, and he doesn't have many positive things to say about Asians.
 
Back
Top