Dumpington
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2001
- Posts
- 2,891
Jeff Wise has written the following for the New York Intelligencer:
It Sure Looks Like the Ukrainian 737 May Have Been Accidentally Shot Down in Iran
In the wake of the crash of Ukrainian International Airlines Flight 752 over Tehran this morning, two schools of thought quickly emerged. The first accepted the explanation given by Iranian authorities: that the 3-year-old 737-800, which had taken off just minutes before, had suffered engine failure before plunging into the ground at Khalaj Abad, killing all 176 aboard. The second, widespread on the internet, is that the Kiev-bound plane had been accidentally shot down by an Iranian air-defense missile.
Given that the facts are just starting to trickle in, it’s far too early to say with any certainty what actually happened. Based on past experience, much of what has been reported as fact will turn out to be wrong; the true cause may very well turn out to be something no one has yet considered. But given the information we have right now, the second explanation makes far more sense than the first.
According to flight data recorded by Flightradar 24, the plane took off at 6.12 a.m. local time, a little more than three hours after Iran had launched more than a dozen ballistic missiles at Iraqi bases hosting U.S. troops. Three minutes later, the plane had reached an altitude of nearly 8,000 feet and was continuing to climb at a steady ground speed of 318 mph. Then, abruptly, it dropped. A state-run Iranian media outlet released a video that appeared to show the aircraft descending in flames before impacting the ground.
An Iranian official told the IRNA news agency that a fire had broken out in one of the engines, causing the pilot to lose control.
Engine malfunctions can certainly cause planes to crash but generally not in the manner observed with Flight 752. The wing, not the engine, is what keeps a plane in the air, and even if a plane loses power in all its engines, it can still glide for a considerable distance under pilot control (see: the Miracle on the Hudson). Even if an engine catches fire, the flight crew generally has time to respond.
Also worth noting too is that Iran’s explanation came implausibly quickly, before officials had scarcely had a chance to pick through the still-smoldering debris. Tellingly, Ukrainian officials, who had initially endorsed the engine-failure explanation after the crash, quickly backtracked, saying it was way too early to ascribe a cause.
To be sure, there are ways other than a missile strike that a passenger plane can come to catastrophic grief soon after takeoff. In the case of Flight 752, however, none seem to fit very well. The plane was fairly new, the pilots quite experienced. It is plausible, however, that Iranian air-defense forces would have been on high alert. President Trump had already warned that the U.S. military would aggressively bomb Iran if the country used force in the spiraling escalation between the two countries. Tehran, the nation’s capital, would be an obvious target.
It Sure Looks Like the Ukrainian 737 May Have Been Accidentally Shot Down in Iran
In the wake of the crash of Ukrainian International Airlines Flight 752 over Tehran this morning, two schools of thought quickly emerged. The first accepted the explanation given by Iranian authorities: that the 3-year-old 737-800, which had taken off just minutes before, had suffered engine failure before plunging into the ground at Khalaj Abad, killing all 176 aboard. The second, widespread on the internet, is that the Kiev-bound plane had been accidentally shot down by an Iranian air-defense missile.
Given that the facts are just starting to trickle in, it’s far too early to say with any certainty what actually happened. Based on past experience, much of what has been reported as fact will turn out to be wrong; the true cause may very well turn out to be something no one has yet considered. But given the information we have right now, the second explanation makes far more sense than the first.
According to flight data recorded by Flightradar 24, the plane took off at 6.12 a.m. local time, a little more than three hours after Iran had launched more than a dozen ballistic missiles at Iraqi bases hosting U.S. troops. Three minutes later, the plane had reached an altitude of nearly 8,000 feet and was continuing to climb at a steady ground speed of 318 mph. Then, abruptly, it dropped. A state-run Iranian media outlet released a video that appeared to show the aircraft descending in flames before impacting the ground.
An Iranian official told the IRNA news agency that a fire had broken out in one of the engines, causing the pilot to lose control.
Engine malfunctions can certainly cause planes to crash but generally not in the manner observed with Flight 752. The wing, not the engine, is what keeps a plane in the air, and even if a plane loses power in all its engines, it can still glide for a considerable distance under pilot control (see: the Miracle on the Hudson). Even if an engine catches fire, the flight crew generally has time to respond.
Also worth noting too is that Iran’s explanation came implausibly quickly, before officials had scarcely had a chance to pick through the still-smoldering debris. Tellingly, Ukrainian officials, who had initially endorsed the engine-failure explanation after the crash, quickly backtracked, saying it was way too early to ascribe a cause.
To be sure, there are ways other than a missile strike that a passenger plane can come to catastrophic grief soon after takeoff. In the case of Flight 752, however, none seem to fit very well. The plane was fairly new, the pilots quite experienced. It is plausible, however, that Iranian air-defense forces would have been on high alert. President Trump had already warned that the U.S. military would aggressively bomb Iran if the country used force in the spiraling escalation between the two countries. Tehran, the nation’s capital, would be an obvious target.