LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Dennis Prager Destroys Obama's Moronic Oil Speech

I just noticed that if you switch around the first letter of Dennis Prager's first and last name you get Pennis Drager. Why does Dennis drag pennises?
 
Biofuel Algae will save us and bring us $2.00 gas.....
 
miles said:
This 10 minute clip says it all

Why DON'T we drill for the oil????

http://www.breitbart.tv/prager-destroys-obamas-algae-oil-speech/
Click to expand...


Because the dimbulbs never learn from their mistakes.



It was the winter of 1978— public schools all over the country are closing because there's a shortage of natural gas heat and all the English majors assure us that the U.S. is running out of natural gas and the government MUST DO SOMETHING! Flash forward 34 years and— voila! — the U.S. is drowning in natural gas.



"Why," you might ask?


The answer is very simple:
"Drill, baby, drill."​











 
1979, long lines at the gas pumps, Iran fucked us again! I was driving a VW Beatle at the time....sort of laughed my way through that crises, that car never ran out of gas!! Filled it up probably once a month.....good ole days! Actually, probably should get a new Jetta...
 
Trysail's graph shows we haven't been in a recession since 2009...can't have it both ways...which is it?
 
Beco said:
1979, long lines at the gas pumps, Iran fucked us again! I was driving a VW Beatle at the time....sort of laughed my way through that crises, that car never ran out of gas!! Filled it up probably once a month.....good ole days! Actually, probably should get a new Jetta...
Click to expand...

another habitual bitcher that when an equal quality American vehicle exists, they won't consider it...instead they would buy something manufactured and assembled in Mexico. But our economy sucks...:rolleyes:
 
Wow. I keep forgetting that anything on Brietbart shouldn't be listened to while drinking.
 
Peregrinator said:
This is a bit like listening to accountants tell us about climate science, right?
Click to expand...



No. The way climate science has been conducted thus far is comparable to a bunch of Seventh Day Adventists and Mormons talking about the rapture and The Holy Ghost.


It's been similar to Jim Jones telling the credulous and the gullible about how good the Kool-Aid is.





http://judithcurry.com/2012/02/24/why-target-heartland/#comment-175243



This evaluation by Dr. Jonathan Jones, professor of physics at Brasenose College, Oxford may be the single most damning indictment of climatology I've ever seen or read. Someone of Dr. Jones' caliber simply does not throw language like this around lightly.


...you have to remember why some of us got involved in the climate wars in the first place.

For me this has never really been about climate itself. I don't find climate partcularly interesting; it's one of those worthy but tedious branches of science which under normal circumstances I would happily leave to other people who like that sort of thing. My whole involvement has always been driven by concerns about the corruption of science.

Like many people I was dragged into this by the Hockey Stick. I was looking up some minor detail about the Medieval Warm Period and discovered this weird parallel universe of people who apparently didn't believe it had happened, and even more bizarrely appeared to believe that essentially nothing had happened in the world before the twentieth century. The Hockey Stick is an extraordinary claim which requires extraordinary evidence, so I started reading round the subject. And it soon became clear that the first extraordinary thing about the evidence for the Hockey Stick was how extraordinarily weak it was, and the second extraordinary thing was how desperate its defenders were to hide this fact. I'd always had an interest in pathological science, and it looked like I might have stumbled across a really good modern example.

You can't spend long digging around the Hockey Stick without stumbling across other areas of climate science pathology. The next one that really struck me was the famous Phil Jones quote: "Why should I make the data available to you, when your aim is to try and find something wrong with it". To any practising scientist that's a huge red flag. Sure we all feel a bit like that on occasion, but to actually say something like that in an email is practically equivalent to getting up on a public platform and saying "I'm a pathological scientist, and I'm proud."

Rather naively I initially believed that Phil Jones was just having a bad day and had said something really stupid. Surely he couldn't really think that was acceptable? And surely his colleagues would deal with him? But no, it turned out that this apalling quote was only the most quotable of several other remarks, and he really was trying to hide his data from people who might (horror of horrors) want to check his conclusions.

That's when I got involved in my FOI request. And consequently got exposed to the full horror of "big climate", as clear an example of politicised and pathological science as I have ever seen. And then came Climategate 2009, and "hide the decline". All downhill from there.

When will I be done with climate? Quite simply when it stops being a pathological science and starts acting according to the normal rules and conventions of scientific discourse. At that point I will, I'm afraid, simply lose interest in the whole business, and leave it to the experts to get on with their stuff, just as I leave most of the rest of science to the appropriate experts.

To put it another way, I will be done with climate once I can trust that Richard Betts can be left to do good work on his own. I absolutely trust you to get on with doing good stuff under normal circumstances. But I'm afraid I don't trust you to do good work under current pathological conditions, because you don't stand up against the all too obvious stench emanating from some of your colleagues.

For me the Hockey Stick was where it began, and probably where it will end (and I will daringly suggest that the same thing might be true for our host). The Hockey Stick is obviously wrong. Everybody knows it is obviously wrong. Climategate 2011 shows that even many of its most outspoken public defenders know it is obviously wrong. And yet it goes on being published and defended year after year.

Do I expect you to publicly denounce the Hockey Stick as obvious drivel? Well yes, that's what you should do. It is the job of scientists of integrity to expose pathological science, and it is especially the job of scientists in closely related fields. You should not be leaving this to random passing NMR spectroscopists who have better things to do. But I'm afraid I no longer expect you to do so. The opportune moment has, I think, passed. And that is why, even though we are all delighted to have you here, and all enjoy what you have to say, some of us get a trifle tetchy from time to time.

You ask us to judge you by AR5, and in many ways that is a reasonable request. Many of us will judge it by the handling of paleoclimate, not because this is all that important an aspect of the science, but rather because it is a litmus test of whether climate scientists are prepared to stand up against the bullying defenders of pathology in their midst. So, Richard, can I look forward to returning back to my proper work on the application of composite rotations to the performance of error-tolerant unitary transformations? Or will we all be let down again?


Dec 3, 2011 at 6:11 PM | Jonathan Jones

http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2011/12/2/tim-barnett-on-the-hockey-stick.html
Click to expand...
 
Beco said:
1979, long lines at the gas pumps, Iran fucked us again! I was driving a VW Beatle at the time....sort of laughed my way through that crises, that car never ran out of gas!! Filled it up probably once a month.....good ole days! Actually, probably should get a new Jetta...
Click to expand...

Simply send U.S. troops and incoming missles to Iran.
 
trysail said:



No. The way climate science has been conducted thus far is comparable to a bunch of Seventh Day Adventists and Mormons talking about the rapture and The Holy Ghost.


It's been similar to Jim Jones telling the credulous and the gullible about how good the Kool-Aid is.





http://judithcurry.com/2012/02/24/why-target-heartland/#comment-175243



This evaluation by Dr. Jonathan Jones, professor of physics at Brasenose College, Oxford may be the single most damning indictment of climatology I've ever seen or read. Someone of Dr. Jones' caliber simply does not throw language like this around lightly.
Click to expand...

Ah, yes, repeat a debunked talking point yet again. Anyone with enough time or energy or interest can wander over to Ham's inconvenient truth thread to find where Jones has made a colossal ass of himself in your c&ped post.
 
Peregrinator said:
Ah, yes, repeat a debunked talking point yet again. Anyone with enough time or energy or interest can wander over to Ham's inconvenient truth thread to find where Jones has made a colossal ass of himself in your c&ped post.
Click to expand...

Guess it's a matter of who the debunkers are.
 
garbage can said:
From what I hear, these are under leases granted by the Bush administration.
Click to expand...

Doesn't matter...the majority of oil leases remain idle. What does matter is the number of ACTIVE oil rigs. Guess what? The number has increase 4x under the Obama Administration from the previous Admin. Facts suck don't they?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Cruise passenger fumes after learning raunchy reason women were flirting with him
Replies
1
Views
397
TheGxForum
TheGxForum
B
Am I Being Unfair
Replies
17
Views
1K
Britva415
Britva415
B
Walt Disney Studios Announces 2026 Blockbuster Film!!! Takeaway: Disney Is Back!!!
Replies
0
Views
255
BobYesTheBob
B
J
The day time stopped for me.
Replies
5
Views
1K
bobb64
B
JenniZinc
Nude Beach - 40 Years Ago vs. Yesterday
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
LeeKee
LeeKee
Back
Top