Debunking 6 common Isreali Myths

Re: p_p_man

kamuikamui said:

Do you truly believe in what you're saying, or, are you saying it just for an argument sake?

I'm saying it because terrorism is the only weapon the Palestinians have against the invading Israeli forces. How else would you want them to try and regain their homeland?

Talking to Sharon?

ppman
 
Ish, baby

Ishmael said:


Hey you pitiful butcherer of histroy. :)

What I had to say in no way contradicted your pitiful little response and I provided far greater detail.

Regardless, my statment still stands. Palestine, at no time, has existed as an autonomous political entity.

The Turks, the Egyptians, the Italians, the French, the British, can claim longer ownership and administrative province over the area.

So, how can something be returned that never existed?

Ishmael

Because in pp's world, 1 + 1 = 3. The jews tried to make everyone think 1 + 1 = 2.
 
Re: Ish, baby

miles said:


Because in pp's world, 1 + 1 = 3. The jews tried to make everyone think 1 + 1 = 2.

Ahhhhhhhh, I forgot. It was when the Rabbi's expurgagated the 'truth' from the Torah that all this started.

Ishmael
 
lostinn said:
The west took one region, divided it into arbitrary countries and left one little area for a non-arab, non-muslim people who had a three thousand plus year history or being a nation.

And precisely where was this "nation" whilst the Palestinians were busy living a life as land cultivators.

Not to put too heavier an emphasise on it here's the second time I've quoted this. I'd be grateful if it was read this time:

"How long has Palestine been a specifically Arab country?

"Palestine became a predominately Arab and Islamic country by the end of the seventh century. Almost immediately thereafter its boundaries and its characteristics - including its name in Arabic, Filastin - became known to the entire Islamic world, as much for its fertility and beauty as for its religious significance...In 1516, Palestine became a province of the Ottoman Empire, but this made it no less fertile, no less Arab or Islamic...Sixty percent of the population was in agriculture; the balance was divided between townspeople and a relatively small nomadic group. All these people believed themselves to belong in a land called Palestine, despite their feelings that they were also members of a large Arab nation...Despite the steady arrival in Palestine of Jewish colonists after 1882, it is important to realize that not until the few weeks immediately preceding the establishment of Israel in the spring of 1948 was there ever anything other than a huge Arab majority. For example, the Jewish population in 1931 was 174,606 against a total of 1,033,314." Edward Said, "The Question of Palestine."

ppman
 
p_p_man said:


And precisely where was this "nation" whilst the Palestinians were busy living a life as land cultivators.

Not to put too heavier an emphasise on it here's the second time I've quoted this. I'd be grateful if it was read this time:

"How long has Palestine been a specifically Arab country?

"Palestine became a predominately Arab and Islamic country by the end of the seventh century. Almost immediately thereafter its boundaries and its characteristics - including its name in Arabic, Filastin - became known to the entire Islamic world, as much for its fertility and beauty as for its religious significance...In 1516, Palestine became a province of the Ottoman Empire, but this made it no less fertile, no less Arab or Islamic...Sixty percent of the population was in agriculture; the balance was divided between townspeople and a relatively small nomadic group. All these people believed themselves to belong in a land called Palestine, despite their feelings that they were also members of a large Arab nation...Despite the steady arrival in Palestine of Jewish colonists after 1882, it is important to realize that not until the few weeks immediately preceding the establishment of Israel in the spring of 1948 was there ever anything other than a huge Arab majority. For example, the Jewish population in 1931 was 174,606 against a total of 1,033,314." Edward Said, "The Question of Palestine."

ppman

That's bullshit and you know it. Arabic, yes, a country, never.

You can't hang your response and argument on that little piece of fluff.

Ishmael
 
Ishmael said:


That's bullshit and you know it. Arabic, yes, a country, never.

You can't hang your response and argument on that little piece of fluff.

Ishmael

Well that little answer speaks volumes about you.

At least you've cleared one thing up. You're basically arguing from a foundation of sand.

ppman
 
Lostinn, on your logic the Israelis really have no claim to the region either. Sure they have big guns, but their own modern history begins relatively recently. What I really want to do is recreate the Hittite state because they were really big. Poor little Hittites.

If there is a moral point to any of this it does not revolve around who was there first or who had a state first. Oh and Jigs, suicide bombing may be the thing that gets the war criminal Sharon to the negotiating table. There will eventually be enough pressure from Israel itself to get him to stop this stupid and dangerous invasion.

Why is it terrorism when the Palestinians assasinate someone and okay when the Israeli's do the same?

Just curious.
 
juicygirl said:
Lostinn, on your logic the Israelis really have no claim to the region either. Sure they have big guns, but their own modern history begins relatively recently. What I really want to do is recreate the Hittite state because they were really big. Poor little Hittites.

If there is a moral point to any of this it does not revolve around who was there first or who had a state first. Oh and Jigs, suicide bombing may be the thing that gets the war criminal Sharon to the negotiating table. There will eventually be enough pressure from Israel itself to get him to stop this stupid and dangerous invasion.

Why is it terrorism when the Palestinians assasinate someone and okay when the Israeli's do the same?

Just curious.


It's just another version of Denial...double standards Juicygirl.




CH
 
lostinn said:


Ishmael uses profanity and that makes his argument meaningless? That's some sterling logic.

God <----- (profanity) you're really clutching at straws now if you believe that...

ppman
 
lostinn said:


My point is that there really is no such thing as a Palestinian and that there definitely is no historic (modern or otherwise)Palestinian nation to restore.

Other more prominent people have said much the same, or similar, things before you.

"There is no such thing as a Palestinian people... It is not as if we came and threw them out and took their country. They didn't exist." -- Golda Meir Statement to The Sunday Times, 15 June, 1969."

"How can we return the occupied territories? There is nobody to return them to." -- Golda Meir (quoted in Chapter 13 of The Zionist Connection II: What Price Peace by Alfred Lilienthal )"

The more I read quotes like that the more I see a little man with a Charlie Chaplin moustache and a funny salute...

ppman
 
lostinn my point is that the Israelis don't really either. They have fought and killed for that land sure, but does that mean they have a right to it. You really have to say no. Surely one can still give the Palestinians a homeland without making it depend on some prior history. Or, the Palestinians can try to take it like the Israelis did. I don't think you really want to say that black South Africans in the apartheid days had no right to self-determination because they had previously created a Western Style state. That's a silly or scary argument.


I say we stop paying off the Israeli's and everyone else in the region and just let everyone kill each other. Wouldn't that be a lovely sight? Of course we could just work on peace.
 
I bet you'll think I am just posting "propaganda" but why don't you have a look at the website I am working from?

This man has been on Television and Radio shows,and he quotes articles from

New York times
Harpers magazine
Chicago Reader

and others...all VERY legitimate American news..

Take your blinders off just for a moment...and look for yourself.

http://www.abunimah.org/


ali abunimah's bitter pill uncovering media myths about the middle east

highlights | archives | middle east links | arab american links | email me |

"The most powerful weapon in the hands of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed."--Stephen Biko

last update: May 2, 2002
updated today:Current Features, Letters to NPR
updated recently:Letters to Other Media

NEW: Debunking Six Common Israeli Myths
By Ali Abunimah & Hussein Ibish
Search this site powered by FreeFind

enter one or more keywords or phrases separated by commas. example: syria, golan heights, CNN
The search engine does not understand questions. It searches for exact text.


Subscribe to the abunimah.org News List

Powered by groups.yahoo.com




Sept 28: New book with Chapter by Hussein Ibish and Ali Abunimah
Edited by Roane Carey with Introduction by Noam Chomsky

Review of The New Intifada in The Daily Star
Read the Village Voice review of The New Intifada
Read the review of The New Intifada in The Scotsman on Sunday

my archives
Travel Writings, Personal Experiences and Background Articles (a good place to start if you're new here)
Selected Audio: Interviews and Debates

letters to NPR (National Public Radio)
letters to The New York Times
letters to the Chicago Tribune
letters to CNN
letters to CBS
letters to The Boston Globe

letters to other media
protest and action letters
lobby watch--what pro-Israeli groups are telling the media

2000 Articles, Features and Audio
1999 Articles, Features and Audio
Afghanistan archive, October 12-November 19, 2001
Special Section on World Trade Center Tragedy

current features

5/2/02 COMMENTARY: There is No News Today
4/25/02 Published Letter: Investigate Jenin--The Chicago Tribune
4/13/02 Resource: Debunking Six Common Israeli Myths--By Ali Abunimah & Hussein Ibish
4/12/02 Listen Online: Ali Abunimah, Jeff Halper, Raphael Cohen Almagor in heated "democracy Now" exchange
4/11/2002 COMMENTARY: What next? By Hasan Abu-Nimah--The Jordan Times
4/10/02 Listen Online: Ali Abunimah, Robert Pape, Jim Kilroy, discuss Israeli-US relations on WEBZ's Odyssey
4/3/02 Read Transcript: Verbal combat with Hannity & Colmes on FOX News
4/4/02 Israel's crude attempt to discredit Palestinian Authority backfires--The Electronic Intifada
4/1/02 Read Transcript: Debate about Palestine on MSNBC's "Making Sense" hosted by Alan Keyes
4/1/02 Letter to Colin Powell: U.S. must enforce U.N. Resolution, stop Israeli attacks
3/29/02 ACTION ALERT: New massacres feared as Israel launches massive assault
3/28/02 Listen Online: Ali Abunimah and Patrick Clawson discuss Palestine conflict on WBEZ
3/26/02 Advisory: TIPH reports "no information on the shooting" of two of its personnel--The Electronic Intifada
3/25/02 Listen Online: Interview on FAIR's Counterspin about coverage of Palestine conflict
3/17/02 Published Letter: Palestinian refugee rights--The New York
3/15/02 Published Letter: Israel's Leaders--The Chicago Tribune
3/14/02 Listen Online: Ali Abunimah and Amira Hass on Democracy Now
3/14/02 Special Report: NPR's Gradstein's unethical payments make broadcasting headlines
3/14/02 Listen Online: Gallup polls on American and Arab/Muslim attitudes discussed on "To The Point"
3/12/02 Images of an Execution--The Electronic Intifada
3/11/02 URGENT ACTION ALERT: Call Powell to stop Israel's massacres
3/7/02 COMMENTARY: Israel's Choice
3/4/02 Listen Online: Interview about situation in Palestine on "Voices That Listen"
2/25/02 Special Report: Will NPR come clean about Gradstein's unethical cash payments?--The Electronic Intifada
2/24/02 USA Today publishes call for ethnic cleansing of Palestinians--The Electronic Intifada
2/23/02 Listen Online: Interview on Flashpoints about Israeli attacks, NPR bias
2/21/02 NPR acknowledges, corrects egregious claim that deadly Israeli attack left "no casualties."
2/20/02 Special Report: NPR Responds to Concerns about Cash Payments to Linda Gradstein--The Electronic Intifada
2/19/02 Special Report: NPR's Linda Gradstein takes cash payments from pro-Israel groups--The Electronic Intifada
2/18/02 COMMENTARY: Israel and the Arab States
2/7/02 Al-Jazeera in English? CNN in Arabic?--The Daily Star (Beirut)
2/4/02 Published Letter: Palestinians have never been offered "half" of anything--Haaretz
2/3/02 Published Article: U.S. Approach Hurts All Parties--The Philadelphia Inquirer
2/1/02 Listen Online: Ali Abunimah, and Eran Lerman discuss situation in Palestine on WBEZ
1/23/02 Former NPR reporter discusses Palestine/Israel reporting, Abunimah letters in Columbia Journalism Review
1/20/02 Published Article: Making Occupation Work--The Jordan Times
1/18/02 Does NPR Ombudsman Jeffrey Dvorkin give worthless assurances?
1/17/02 Ali Abunimah on live NPR call-in today
1/10/02 FAIR: For NPR, Violence Is Calm if It's Violence Against Palestinians
1/8/02 Israeli occupation kills 31 Palestinians during period NPR calls "quiet"
1/4/02 Bernard Lewis and the true price of a cup of coffee
1/4/02 Anti-occupation activists question US aid to Israel--Village Voice
1/2/02 Letter to Colin Powell: Arrest and beating of Dr. Mustafa Barghouthi
12/27/01 Seeking an Arab view of news--The Baltimore Sun
12/14/01 Arab Reaction to Bin Laden Tape--Salon.com
12/13/01 Listen Online: Ali Abunimah responds Hendrik Hertzberg of The New Yorker on Democracy Now
12/12/01 Published Article: Chicago Tribune publishes Jewish and Arab views of Palestinian-Israeli conflict
12/6/01 Read Transcript: Abunimah in washingtonpost.com Live Online Q&A about Palestine/Israel
12/6/01 Read Transcript: Abunimah on MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Matthews
12/5/01 Published Article: Sharon's War Cannot be Won--The New York Times
12/3/01 Listen Online: Ali Abunimah and Amotz Asa-El (Jerusalem Post) react to suicide bombings--WBEZ
12/2/01 Commentary: Bombs and Wreaths
11/28/01Listen Online: Interview about coverage of Palestinian-Israeli conflict since September 11
11/28/01 Review of The New Intifada in The Daily Star
11/21/01Listen Online: Interview on WBEZ radio about Powell Speech
11/20/01 Published Article:The true measure of Israel's 'democracy'--The Jordan Times
11/19/01 Letter to Colin Powell: On your speech at Louisville
11/11/01 Review of The New Intifada in The Scotsman on Sunday
11/14/01 NPR host Neal Conan answers criticism of segment on Al-Jazeera
11/9/01 Published Article: You cannot be serious, Mr. Peres--The Jordan Times
11/2/01 Afghan War's Innocent Victims See An Indifferent West--The Hartford Courant
11/1/01 Published Article: Open Letter to President Bush (from a US taxpayer)--The Jordan Times
10/31/01 Published Letter Internet Rumors about Al-Jazeera--The Chicago Tribune
10/29/01 Read the Village Voice review of The New Intifada
10/23/01 Letter to Colin Powell: One Hundred Percent Effort Needed
10/22/01 Published Article: The CNN of the Arab World should be respected--The Los Angeles Times
10/20/01 Letter to Colin Powell: Time to Take a Stand
10/18/01 War is not the way to fight terror--Article by Hasan Abu-Nimah
10/15/01 Published Article: For the Palestinians, the crisis has two faces--The Los Angeles Times
10/10/01 Listen Online:How do Palestinians see the world? Interview on "This American Life"
10/9/01 "Suspicious Minds" -- Salon.com
10/8/01 Listen Online: Interview about Palestinian crackdown in Gaza -- on WBEZ Radio
10/8/01 Listen Online: Interview about role of Al-Jazira in Afghanistan crisis -- on Pacifica's Flashpoints
10/5/01 Published Article "Terrorist by Association" -- Interview with Mike Miner in The Chicago Reader
10/4/01 COMMENTARY: No to US-demanded crackdown on free Arab media
10/1/01 Published Article: Seizing the Moment -- The Jordan Times
9/28/01 Abunimah & Ibish Chapter in New Verso Book "The New Intifada"
9/24/01 Listen Online: Sept 14 interview on Alternative Radio about WTC and Pentagon attacks and aftermath
9/21/01 Listen Live Today: Live Call-in on Wisconsin Public Radio
9/18/01 The Gift of Diversity, the Need for Tolerance--Business Week Column quotes Abunimah, Khalidi, others on Anti-Arab backlash
9/18/01 COMMENTARY: Thoughts from New York City
9/13/01 Special Section on World Trade Center Tragedy
9/13/01 Joint Arab-American, Muslim-American Statement
9/13/01 Attacks against Arab Americans and Muslims in Chicago
9/13/01 Coverage Trend: Palestinian people, as a whole, portrayed as supportive of the attacks on the World Trade Center
9/12/01 COMMENTARY: A Few Words
9/11/01 COMMENTARY: An Unbelievable Tragedy
9/6/01 Listen Online: Ali Abunimah debates Israeli "terrorism expert" Boaz Ganor on WBEZ
9/6/01 Published Article: The Intifada then and now--The Jordan Times
9/6/01 Published Article: Hamburger Hoax: Dont's swallow the claim that McDonald's is sending money to Israel
8/31/01 Published Letter: Seeking Equilibrium in the Middle East--The New York Times
8/22/01 Read Transcript: Ali Abunimah and Malcolm Hoenlein debate on KPFK
8/22/01 Published Article: The Palestinians' Great Crime: A brief summary for the uninitiated
8/21/01 REPORT: CAMERA's Assault on NPR and the Truth
8/21/01 REPORT: Israeli minister calls for killing of families of suicide bombers
8/17/01 Published Letter:Israel must live in the Twenty First Century--The Jerusalem Post
8/17/01 Listen Online: Ali Abunimah and Malcolm Hoenlein debate on Pacifica
8/17/01 NPR's extreme distortions and falsehoods about Jerusalem
8/15/01 Read Transcript: Ali Abunimah and Jerry Lewis of Israel Radio in BBC debate
8/15/01 Listen Online: Ali Abunimah and Hussein Ibish debate Israeli views on WBEZ
8/9/01 Incitement by National Public Radio's Linda Gradstein
8/9/01 Published Letter: Ed Koch denies Israel's occupation--Newsday
8/9/01 Published Article: Israel's Rule of Lawlessness--The Jordan Times
8/6/01 REPORT: "Dovish" Knesset speaker says Palestinians "unhuman"
8/3/01 Published Letter: Occupation is not "self-defense"--The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
8/1/01 Listen Online:Dennis Ross, Robert Malley, Ali Abunimah and Ariel Levite in debate on KCRW
8/1/01 COMMENTARY: Fool me once shame on you. Fool me three times....
7/30/01 June 18 article in Israeli "Jerusalem Report" on Electronic Intifada
7/20/01 COMMENTARY: Strength and Patience
7/19/01 Published Article: Sharon's Deadly Calculus--The Jordan Times
7/13/01 Published Article: Back To Shatilla--The Jordan Times
7/10/01 Letter to Colin Powell: Israeli (and U.S.) war crimes
7/5/01 Published Article: No Turning Back--The Jordan Times
6/27/01 Published Article: A compliant and cowardly press--The Jordan Times
6/18/01 Published Article: Return to Clinton Approach Heralds Disaster--The Jordan Times
6/17/01 Watch Online: The BBC program about Sharon that Israel doesn't want you to see
6/11/01 ADL response to my Philadelphia Inquirer Op-Ed
6/11/01 Letter to Colin Powell: Israel's illegal use of weapons against civilians
6/10/01 Published Letter:Inflammatory Chicago Tribune editorial
6/7/01 Published Article: U.S. must take new approach to Mideast--The Philadelphia Inquirer
6/6/01 Letter to Colin Powell: Free U.S. citizens trapped in Israel
6/2/01 Letter to Colin Powell: You must act to stop revenge
5/23/01 Published Article New ADC Issue Paper by Ibish and Abunimah on Right of Return
5/22/01 Listen Online: Interview about Mitchell Report on WBEZ radio
5/21/01 IPA Release: Responses to Mitchell Report
5/19/01 Letter to Colin Powell: How to stop the violence
5/10/01 Text of remarks delivered at JUNITY conference
5/7/01 Published Article Harsh Images, Harsher Realities--The Jordan Times
5/6/01 REPORT: Spat upon, threatened, we stood for Palestine
4/28/01 Published Letter: Name-calling--The Chicago Tribune
4/20/01 Nigel Parry uncovers more serious concerns about Israel Shamir from Parry's The Israel Shamir Case Index
4/17/01 REPORT: Chicagoans protests war and taxes
4/16/01 Serious Concerns about Israel Shamir--A statement from Ali Abunimah and Hussein Ibish
4/15/01 Published Article Kofi Annan's Equivocation--The Jordan Times
4/15/01 Outrageous: NPR reports on one lightly injured Israel and ignores nearly one hundred injured Palestinians
4/11/01 Quoted in Cairo Times on ADL's report on 'Egyptian anti-semitism'
4/10/01 Published Article Article on Palestinian Right of Return by Ibish and Abunimah
4/8/01 REPORT: The New York rally for the Palestinian right of return
4/3/01 Letter to Colin Powell: Eight houses demolished today
3/31/01 A New York Times Editorial (slightly modified)
4/2/01 Published Article Consequences--The Jordan Times
3/29/01 Published Article Israelis and the Right of Return--Haaretz
3/27/01 (Open) Letter to The Washington Post: With just a little change...
3/26/01 COMMENTARY: Waiting for Mitchell
3/21/01 Published Letter:'Human shields' a calumny--The Montreal Gazette
3/16/01 ADC Action Alert on NPR cites this website
3/12/01 Published Article Israel's South African Dilemma--The Jordan Times
3/8/01 ADL responds to my op-ed in The Philadelphia Inquirer
3/6/01 Published Article Israel Blind to its own Legacy--The Philadelphia Inquirer
3/5/01 COMMENTARY: Another Bloodstained Dawn
2/26/01 Letter to Colin Powell: A step in the right direction
2/20/01 Letter to Colin Powell: Israeli house demolitions
2/18/01 Published Letter: Courageous editorial--The Chicago Tribune
1/28/01 Published Letter: Excellent article on refugees--The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
2/17/01 REPORT: United States and Britain isolated after attack on Iraq
2/13/01 Published Letter: UK helping Israeli aggression?--The Jordan Times
2/10/01 Published Letter: "Occupying Force"--The Chicago Tribune
2/9/01 REPORT: Major U.S. Jewish organizations welcome Sharon victory
2/8/01 REPORT: Dennis Ross confronted about pro-Israel ties
2/7/01 COMMENTARY: Sharon Wins. Where does the compass point today?
2/1/01 Chicago Tribune report on Teach-In with Ali Abunimah and David Roet, Deputy Consul-General of Israel
1/26/01 ACTION ALERT: Free Su'ad Ghazal
1/23/01 Published Letter: Letter Printed in Washington Post: Israel's Extrajudicial Executions
1/19/01 Published Letter:The Jerusalem Post's prints op-ed responding to my article
1/13/01 COMMENTARY: Arafat's Executions
1/10/01 Published Article Israel should welcome the refugees--The Financial Times
1/4/01 Listen Online: Ali Abunimah and pro-Israeli David Schenker on WBEZ radio
1/3/01 ACTION ALERT: Right of Return under new threat from "Clinton Plan"
Disclaimer: All opinions expressed in my writings are my own, and are not necessarily those of any organizations with which I am affiliated.

Note on External Links: Many of the links on www.abunimah.org are to external websites. I have no responsibility for the content of external sites and their being linked should not necessarily be construed as an endorsement or agreement with their content.


middle east-related sites
palestine/israel

Palestinian Centre for Human Rights, Gaza Strip
al-awda.org
The Palestinian Return Centre--includes Dr. Salman Abu-Sitta's important research on the feasibility of return to Palestine
Council for Palestinian Restitution and Reparation--please sign their online petition
Center for Policy Analysis on Palestine--useful policy briefs about all aspects of the conflict
The Center for Economic and Social Rights--important new research about the deteriorating situation in the occupied territories
www.golan-syria.org--New Syrian site about occupied Golan Heights
Birzeit's complete guide to Palestine on the web
LAW-a Palestinian human rights group (information on house demolitions, land confiscation, human rights)
BADIL Resource Center on Palestinian residency and refugee rights
B'Tselem-an Israeli human rights group
Palestine Information Center (alquds.org)
Foundation for Middle East Peace-information and maps of Israeli settlements in occupied territory
Gush Shalom--Israeli grassroots peace movement
Bat Shalom--Israeli feminists for peace and social justice working with Palestinian women
Deir Yassin Remembered
Dheisheh Refugee Camp, Palestine--Visiting this site is a must. Refugees speak about themselves, their history and their future.
A Personal Diary of the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict (Nigel Parry)
MIFTAH--The Palestinian Intiative for the Promotion of Global Dialogue and Democracy
Permanent Observer Mission of Palestine to the United Nations--has comprehensive archive of UN resolutions and documents relating to Palestine
Hanthala--a site on international law and human rights in Palestine
The Canadian-Palestinian Educational Exchange
An American Family tells of its trip to Palestine--good reading resource list and links
www.jerusalemites.org--A site by Jerusalemites, all about the city's history, culture and politics
UNISPAL--The United Nations Information System on the Question of Palestine
PLO Negotiations Affairs Department
Orthodox Jews opposed to Zionism
Not In My Name
iraq


Education for Peace in Iraq Center (EPIC)--see this site for important Iraq-related action alerts
Voices in the Wilderness--a campaign to end economic sanctions against the people of Iraq
Iraq Action Coalition
Sanctioning Peace: a carefully selected index of internet resources on Iraq
general middle east


AMEU--Americans for Middle East Understanding (publishers of The Link)
MERIP--Middle East Research and Information Project (publishers of Middle East Report)
arab american

Cafe Arabica--"The Arab American Online Community Center"
Leb.net--links to Arab and Arab American organizations
The Arab American Action Network
The American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC)--The largest grassroots organization representing Arab Americans
arab-american.com
ArabAmerican.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CH
 
p_p_man said:


Well that little answer speaks volumes about you.

At least you've cleared one thing up. You're basically arguing from a foundation of sand.

ppman

Come on, cough up one authoritive source. Be sure to quote your sources, or post the link.

Ishmael
 
juicygirl said:
lostinn my point is that the Israelis don't really either. They have fought and killed for that land sure, but does that mean they have a right to it. You really have to say no. Surely one can still give the Palestinians a homeland without making it depend on some prior history. Or, the Palestinians can try to take it like the Israelis did. I don't think you really want to say that black South Africans in the apartheid days had no right to self-determination because they had previously created a Western Style state. That's a silly or scary argument.


I say we stop paying off the Israeli's and everyone else in the region and just let everyone kill each other. Wouldn't that be a lovely sight? Of course we could just work on peace.

OK JG, another little history lesson.

In 1948, the UN was charged with the disposition of what was then known as the British Middle East Protectorate. That area known as Palesitne and what includes Isreal.

The decision was made to split the area into two bodies. Creating a homeland for the Jews (Isreal) and a homeland for the Arabs (Palestine).

At the urging of their Arab neighbors (Syria, Egypt, and etc.) the indigenous peoples were told to leave and join with their neighbors in 'sweeping' the Jews from the area.

Within days of the creation of the state of Isreal, the Arabs attacked. The goal was (and still is) to have the whole pie rather than share it. The Arabs lost.

The majority of Palestinian refugees are refugees of their own choosing. They gambled on having the having everything and lost.

Can a person that runs away from their own property in order to organinze and deprive another of theirs rightfully be called a refugee? For the most part their claim to refugee status is bunk. A recent perversion of the truth to marshall world opinion sympathetic to their cause.

And what is their cause? Well as much of a twit as YoYoTwat is, at least he isn't disengenious on this point. The erradication of Israel.

So, I posit my question one more time. Is it intellectually justifiable to support a group that calls for the complete erradication of another?

This call for the erradication of the Jews from the middle east is not some nebulous rambling on my part, but stated explicitly in the Palestinian Charter, which is available on-line.

ppman and others have refered to these genocidal paragraphs in the charter as nothing more than 'bargianing chips' for the Palestinians.

I submit that using the threat of visiting death upon another party to achieve one's own goals has another name. It's called extortion.

As for CH's sources. Repeatedly saying the same thing over and over does not make the statements correct in anyway. Adolf Hitler was the modern architect of "The Big Lie". In the end, Arafat will probably occupy a similar position in history.

ppman's biggest beef is Sharon. And it may suprise him to find out that in some respects I'm sympathetic to his views of the man. But Sharon is a legally elected official that probably would have never attained the position that he occupies if it were not for the actions of Arafat and his surrogates. When a nation, or more properly the citizens of that nation, believe themselves to be under seige or attack, the natural tendency is to select a leader that will eliminate the enemy. Israel should not be expected to conduct it self in a manner counter to it's continued existance.

Ishmael
 
juicygirl said:
Oh and Jigs, suicide bombing may be the thing that gets the war criminal Sharon to the negotiating table. There will eventually be enough pressure from Israel itself to get him to stop this stupid and dangerous invasion.
Juicygirl, to believe that would be a fatal miscalculation on the part of the terrorists. The Israeli response to these attacks has been, and will continue to be, to do whatever is necessary to defend themselves. They now see the barbaric behavior of Arafat and his crew for what it is - an attempt to totally destroy them. They will never allow it, never capitulate to this behavior. Continuation of the homocide bombings will bring upon the Palestinians the annhialation that they wish to inflict upon the Israelis. Some people never learn.
 
p_p_man
Another one of those "I'm the only one who's seen action" posters. Once again Jigs you destroy the validity of an entire post by making idiotic statements like that...

Pray tell us then, what qualifies you an expert on how wars are fought by men whose lives are on line? Just what validity is your pontification on who is justified in the way he fights, and who is not?

Before I go any further, let me make it plain that I am not in favor of killing civilians for the sake of killing civilians. Aside from morality, I am opposed because wars aren't won by killing civilians. On the other hand, civilians don't have any immunity when I must go after an armed and dangerous enemy, and that is particularly true when that enemy is hiding in the midst of a civilian population.

I would not trash the village the way Lt. Cally did in Vietnam. That was stupid and unnecessary. (Unlike your Palistinian pals, I wouldn't plant a bomb is a civilian resturant either by the way).

On the other hand if I'm a company commander on the outskirts of what I have every reason to believe is a village saturated with enemy soldiers, just what would you have me do? Am I to send my men in there and expose them to death and injury in a man to man fight, hut to hut? If I did so, I would be a stupid as Lt. Cally and quite as deserving of court martial as he was.

My big advantage over my enemy is the firepower at my disposal. Depending upon the situation I might first probe at the village with a small patrol, or I might not. That would be a judgment call dependant on the all the circumstances of the moment, and how much danger I think I can smell in the air. If I did probe, and a single sniper shot was fired at my patrol, my decision would be the same either way. I would pull back and call for artillery, and/or the fighter-bombers with cluster bombs and napalm. In the end whatever enemy was in the village would be dead, no doubt along with a good many civilians, but I would be alive and all my men would be alive. Whether you like and not, that's THE measure of success in war.

You can call that measure terrorism if you want. I call it a soldier doing his job, but then you how could you possibly know the difference from the safety of your London flat? Everything to you is a theory, based upon whenever criteria of morality you have decided upon from reading some book. Out on the edge of that village in the dark with danger all around, things are not like that at all.

Your failure to understand that Sir is what destroys the validity of this post
 
Ishmael,

No reason to be condescending because I disagree with. As to CH's sources, you really havn't shown why you think they're wrong except that they disagree with you. The New York Times is not notorious for its pro-Arafat stance you know. The big lie is told on both sides here. And you are willing to throw your support to a man who is an acknowledged war criminal because he got elected. So did that paper hanger from Austria. Though in all fairness that was before he was a war criminal. Fortunately Sharon has yet to use Menachem Begin's language of a final solution to the Palestinian problem.

Also both you, Jigs, and Yogi Bare seem to basically be claiming that might makes right in each of these issues, and you seem to insist that perforce anyone who calls himself a Palestinian is a liar or simply disingenuous. This is an incredibly imperialist and odd position to hold. You appear (and again I may have you wrong) to have simply eradicated the Palesitinians with a few verbal moves, assimilated people who claim a distinct culture into Arabs in general (Again one would have to say that this cannot really be done and be fair to Iranians, Afghanis, and so on), and provided no justification for current Israeli moves.

I'm not justifying terrorism. I am not going to justify a war on an entire populace either.

As to the military experts. Seems to me that the IRA kicked the brits out of Ireland with terror. Britain, if you'll recall, was certainly unafraid to machine gun entire populations at that time.

Also the Sandinistas were able to take over Nicaragua again by terrorist means. We could also discuss the Afghani fighters resistance to the Soviets. We might even consider the cubans under Castro. Now I agree with you that suicide bombing is not the way to go. However, doesn't that tell you how deep the desparation of these guys must be? I assume you don't think all arabs are a bunch of fucking (insert racial epithet).

If the Palestinians start overtaking the Israelis in the life v. death category don't you think that someone might be willing to negotiate -- or are the Israelis and Palestinians so irrational that they would rather kill themselves to do. That would be great because as far as I can tell, in the rush to take sides on the issue, an eye for an eye has rendered the whole world blind.

Oh and the Israeli constitution specifically grants the Israeli's the right to torture. Oh, and I don't know if this is in the constitution, the Israeli military routinely assasinates its enemies. One more thing a Jew, I think he was American so I won't specify Israeli, killed Ytzak Rabin (I hope I got the spelling of his name correct), who sued for peace and was surely no dove. So lets not pretend that Arafat was the only foul dealer in the peace process.

Oh and since the Israeli position has been over the last year or so that Arafat is irrelevant, dutifully parroted by the current U.S. administration, how could he possibly have stopped terrorist attacks. Lets not forget that he has been held hostage by the Israelis too. Enough of this no one seems willing to do much besides repeat themselves on this post. Farewell my friends may we all get a few dark-eyed virgins sometime in our life or a really good bagel. (Okay that was really terrible of me to say but Peace! anyway. REally I'll remove it if anyone was offended).

one last thing, if you are just talking military strategy then you're are not talking any sort of justification for either side. The Palestinians have no reason not to target civilians. Good luck with the slaugher of innocents boys, you really seem to want to drown in their blood!!!
 
Back
Top