Dayton Killer Was a Leftist

[Boxlicker101]

The Dayton shooter espoused left wing ideologies and was a member or supporter of Antifa.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Dayton_shooting

Soon after the attack, law enforcement confirmed that the gunman was Connor Stephen Betts, a 24-year-old from Bellbrook, Ohio.[23][13][24] On Betts' Twitter account, he described himself as a leftist, anime fan, and metalhead. He had posted tweets that opposed Donald Trump and supported Elizabeth Warren, socialism, and Satan.[25][26][27] Although many of his tweets were mundane and non-political, he had retweeted posts that supported the antifa movement and opposed U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents and police officers. In the hours before he opened fire in Dayton, he "liked" a post in favor of gun control, and several concerning the 2019 El Paso shooting, including a tweet that called the El Paso shooter a "terrorist" and a "white supremacist."[27]

 

[jaF0]

Dud(e), you haven't read the other 87 posts on this?

Or heard that none of that may have any bearing on what he did?

Or do you just want to see your own name on a thread?

 

[phrodeau]

So he should have had guns? Or not, or what?

 

[Dumpington]

phrodeau writes: "So he should have had guns? Or not, or what?"

Tonight there were TWO stories on the nightly news about killers attacking people with KNIVES - one was in Santa Ana, California, where a 33-year old wacko named Zachary Castaneda murdered four people and seriously wounded two others - while across the nation in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, a different wacko went on a rampage, stabbing one woman to death while injuring another waiting at a bus stop! The police disarmed him and took him into custody.

WHY do people need knives, phrodeau? Shouldn't the liberals in Washington AT LEAST be demanding that we put up signs saying: "No Knife Zone" at bus stops and near schools? Or does the left simply not care all that much about people dying?

The truth is, there are a LOT of crazies out there - (many of whom are hate-filled radical lefties) - who don't value human life! We live in a culture today that doesn't value human life! We need to change that or things will undoubtedly get worse!

 

[My I]

The El Paso and Dayton killers BOTH had violent histories and should not have been on the streets to start with. But LIBERAL POLICIES protected their rights to lead "normal" lives. Ironic that both cities are run by Liberal Mayors, Isn't it? And both home towns of Dem Presidential Candidates. Hmmmmm.....

But hey, that's all just Conservative bullshit, right? The Constitution specifically allows for punishing the innocent. Doesn't it?

 

[My I]

So he should have had guns? Or not, or what?

Neither of them "should" have had guns. That's what the backgrounds checks you Liberals demand were supposed to prevent. Unfortunately, if no one reports arrests for violent crimes to NICS, and no one reports mental illness to NICS, they cannot stop the sale of a firearm to them. Who's policies prevent violent criminals from being reported to NICS in order to protect their rights?

Cain killed Abel with a rock. We don't have a gun problem. We have a psychology problem. And we have a problem of people defending the rights of the WRONG people. Who would that be?

 

[YDB95]

The El Paso and Dayton killers BOTH had violent histories and should not have been on the streets to start with. But LIBERAL POLICIES protected their rights to lead "normal" lives.

It ain't the liberals who've been fighting tooth and nail against any gun control legislation whatsoever for decades. A red-flag law could have kept guns out of these guys' hands. But the bought-and-paid-for Republicans never would have passed it.

 

[My I]

It ain't the liberals who've been fighting tooth and nail against any gun control legislation whatsoever for decades. A red-flag law could have kept guns out of these guys' hands. But the bought-and-paid-for Republicans never would have passed it.

What the FUCK good is red flag laws if you won't enforce the CURRENT laws????


Red flag laws are BULLSHIT. Neighbor doesn't like the TRUMP sign in my yard and reports me for "violent outbursts" when she's never even seen or spoken to me.

#metoometoometoo Shit like that just brings out the liars who are starved for attention.

I have no problem registering my guns. I have no problem with background checks. What I have a problem with is people like you who totally clueless and unbelievably irrational. You're blinded by you your idealism and your overwhelming desire to "DO SOMETHING" just forces shit that doesn't work. Do something about the CRIMINALS.

BTW: California has a brilliant plan that shows what a fucking liar you are. BAN ALL AUTOMATICS OF ANY TYPE. Confiscate all existing guns and ammo. Yeah, That's reasonable and rational.

 

[YDB95]

What the FUCK good is red flag laws if you won't enforce the CURRENT laws????


Red flag laws are BULLSHIT. Neighbor doesn't like the TRUMP sign in my yard and reports me for "violent outbursts" when she's never even seen or spoken to me.

#metoometoometoo Shit like that just brings out the liars who are starved for attention.

I have no problem registering my guns. I have no problem with background checks. What I have a problem with is people like you who totally clueless and unbelievably irrational. You're blinded by you your idealism and your overwhelming desire to "DO SOMETHING" just forces shit that doesn't work. Do something about the CRIMINALS.

BTW: California has a brilliant plan that shows what a fucking liar you are. BAN ALL AUTOMATICS OF ANY TYPE. Confiscate all existing guns and ammo. Yeah, That's reasonable and rational.

None of that is how red flag laws work. And your whining about #MeToo makes you sound an awful lot like an MRA. Which wouldn't surprise me in the least.

 

[My I]

LOL So because I think you're wrong and clueless that makes me a dangerous homicidal maniac? You're almost as entertaining as Fraudo and Little Danny.

But you want to make accusations like that? Here's what you do: Call the Federal Bureau of Investigations, give them your proof, that's cold hard evidence, and have me red flagged.

Here's the number for the Cincinnati Field office: (972) 559-5000. That's the field office closest to my home. Go on give them a call and tell them what a whacko I am. I dare ya.

 

[dan_c00000]

Here's the number for the Cincinnati Field office: (972) 559-5000. That's the field office closest to my home. Go on give them a call and tell them what a whacko I am. I dare ya.

How about you give us your name and address too tough guy?

 

[YDB95]

LOL So because I think you're wrong and clueless that makes me a dangerous homicidal maniac?

Nope. Didn't say that.

 

[phrodeau]

LOL So because I think you're wrong and clueless that makes me a dangerous homicidal maniac? You're almost as entertaining as Fraudo and Little Danny.

But you want to make accusations like that? Here's what you do: Call the Federal Bureau of Investigations, give them your proof, that's cold hard evidence, and have me red flagged.

Here's the number for the Cincinnati Field office: (972) 559-5000. That's the field office closest to my home. Go on give them a call and tell them what a whacko I am. I dare ya.

I called, and talked to Phil. He said you’re harmless enough, and to let him know if you threaten anyone online. Said he’d check into the MRA stuff.

 

[My I]

I called, and talked to Phil. He said you’re harmless enough, and to let him know if you threaten anyone online. Said he’d check into the MRA stuff.

You're a larf riot. With Little Danny you're almost as entertaining as Beavis and Butthead, Only less mature and far less refined.

Is Phil still trying to butch up by chewing on his glasses?

And I have never threatened ANYONE online. Unless you count the time Little Danny reported me for saying something I didn't. Never threatened him and in fact his death in that case would have been counter-productive for me.

 

[JackLuis]

What I wonder about the Dayton Killer is, Why did he kill his sister?

He may have been a Lefty Loonie, but was his sister the main reason for his attack? Was she a Trumpette, or did she piss in his Wheaties?

 

[LincolnDuncan]

The Dayton shooter espoused left wing ideologies and was a member or supporter of Antifa.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Dayton_shooting

Soon after the attack, law enforcement confirmed that the gunman was Connor Stephen Betts, a 24-year-old from Bellbrook, Ohio.[23][13][24] On Betts' Twitter account, he described himself as a leftist, anime fan, and metalhead. He had posted tweets that opposed Donald Trump and supported Elizabeth Warren, socialism, and Satan.[25][26][27] Although many of his tweets were mundane and non-political, he had retweeted posts that supported the antifa movement and opposed U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents and police officers. In the hours before he opened fire in Dayton, he "liked" a post in favor of gun control, and several concerning the 2019 El Paso shooting, including a tweet that called the El Paso shooter a "terrorist" and a "white supremacist."[27]

Were there any clues in his writing that his politics were a motivational factor in him committing mass murder?

 

[My I]

What I wonder about the Dayton Killer is, Why did he kill his sister?

He may have been a Lefty Loonie, but was his sister the main reason for his attack? Was she a Trumpette, or did she piss in his Wheaties?

Dude was batshit crazy. Trying to figure that out would be like examining scrambled eggs to find the source of Thor's hammer's ability to not move for anyone eating boiled peanuts. History of violence, history of mental illness why was he on the streets?

 

[Boxlicker101]

Were there any clues in his writing that his politics were a motivational factor in him committing mass murder?

Only that he was deranged, but nothing specific.

 

[jaF0]

What I wonder about the Dayton Killer is, Why did he kill his sister?

He may have been a Lefty Loonie, but was his sister the main reason for his attack? Was she a Trumpette, or did she piss in his Wheaties?

As yet undetermined. But as I said in one of the other threads, since it was her and her date, one has to wonder if this wasn't brother with sister fantasies .....


Perhaps, they were the intended targets and the rest were 'collateral damage'.

 

[icanhelp1]

Dude was batshit crazy. Trying to figure that out would be like examining scrambled eggs to find the source of Thor's hammer's ability to not move for anyone eating boiled peanuts. History of violence, history of mental illness why was he on the streets?

The fact that an individual has a screw loose never enters the equation with the left. The common denominator is always the gun, background checks and party affiliation. It's more complicated than that. An in depth scientific study needs to be conducted on the relationship between social media and violence. Rushing to judgement and making new laws that won't be followed will only mask the real cause of mass shootings.

 

[JackLuis]

As yet undetermined. But as I said in one of the other threads, since it was her and her date, one has to wonder if this wasn't brother with sister fantasies .....


Perhaps, they were the intended targets and the rest were 'collateral damage'.

You mean he was a leftest Pervert?

Or a perverted Leftest?

I heard, (AKA People are saying,) that the mother of the El Paso shooter called the cops on her son saying, "I don't think you want my son waltzing about with an AK-47." Po Po did nada!

 

[YDB95]

The fact that an individual has a screw loose never enters the equation with the left.

Of course it does. That's why we don't buy the argument that the Second Amendment somehow means anybody and their cousin ought to be able to stockpile any kind of weapons they want without anyone allowed to take notice.

 

[My I]

Of course it does. That's why we don't buy the argument that the Second Amendment somehow means anybody and their cousin ought to be able to stockpile any kind of weapons they want without anyone allowed to take notice.

And it doesn't. What the Liberals refuse to see is that the gun control laws they want to write target the innocent and let the criminals, and the lunatics, do as they please.

Gun registration: Criminals and the crazies don't register their guns. What good does it do?

"Assault Weapon" Ban: Criminals don't care about your ban. They can get what they want any time.

Red flag laws: How many times have you heard, after the attacker is identified, his neighbors say, "He was a quiet man." Every single member of Anrtifa needs to be "Red Flagged". But I'd bet dollars to donuts none of you Liberals are even thinking about them.

Do something about the criminals. Do something about the violent mentally ill that are allowed to walk the streets. Do something about the actual problem instead of targeting the law abiding gun owners who have never done anything wrong and would be the ones protecting you in one of these situations.

Seriously, what is wrong with you people? Do you see legal gun owners as being more courageous than you and the embarrassment of it eats away at you until you just can't stand seeing someone who is better than you? I really don't understand your thinking. You target the innocent and defend the violent. What the fuck is wrong with your heads?

 

[icanhelp1]

Of course it does. That's why we don't buy the argument that the Second Amendment somehow means anybody and their cousin ought to be able to stockpile any kind of weapons they want without anyone allowed to take notice.

First off, the second amendment doesn't allow anyone to stockpile any kind of weapon, and second, the purchase of a weapon does not go unnoticed. There are special federal and ATF requirements for the purchase of fully automatic weapons and background checks are required for purchasing a weapon from a dealer. The gun loophole has not been found to be a cause or implicated with mass shootings but I think most american citizens would go along with tightening gun loopholes. I did notice that the 3 states with the highest gun murder rates per/capita do not require a license to own, But then, Chicago has some of the strictest gun laws and they have more gun violence and death than some states. I believe that all mass shooters acquired their weapons legally. Following the laws that are on the books would be more effective rather than tabling new legislation that would not be adhered to. States input into a federal registration of felons and people with mental disabilities be mandatory and 100% participation. Registration for mental illness I'm pretty sure would be fought tooth and nail by the ACLU.

 

[YDB95]

And it doesn't. What the Liberals refuse to see is that the gun control laws they want to write target the innocent and let the criminals, and the lunatics, do as they please.

Gun registration: Criminals and the crazies don't register their guns. What good does it do?

"Assault Weapon" Ban: Criminals don't care about your ban. They can get what they want any time.

Again, by the logic you're using here, we should never bother having any laws at all because criminals will ignore them. The fundamental difference between the US and the rest of the world is the availability of the guns in the first place.

Red flag laws: How many times have you heard, after the attacker is identified, his neighbors say, "He was a quiet man."

Not with El Paso or Dayton, just for starters. In both cases, they had skeletons in their closets that were commonly known among those who knew them.

Every single member of Anrtifa needs to be "Red Flagged".

If they have a history of hate speech and advocating violence, I'd agree. But I doubt that very much.

Do something about the criminals. Do something about the violent mentally ill that are allowed to walk the streets. Do something about the actual problem instead of targeting the law abiding gun owners who have never done anything wrong and would be the ones protecting you in one of these situations.

First of all, the same people who have fought gun control tooth and nail for decades have also fought just as hard to cut social services to the bone, which is why the violent mentally ill "are allowed to walk the streets". If you're calling for greater spending on treatment and institutions in which to provide that treatment, I'm with you 100%. But it's your side of the aisle that has done all it could to prevent that for a very long time now.

As for "would be the ones protecting you", that is very rarely how it actually works out. People tend to vastly misjudge the way they would act in an emergency situation when they've never actually been in one.

Seriously, what is wrong with you people? Do you see legal gun owners as being more courageous than you and the embarrassment of it eats away at you until you just can't stand seeing someone who is better than you?

Quite the opposite. I see them as a bunch of paranoid cowards.