Dancing in the Streets

ABSTRUSE

Cirque du Freak
Joined
Mar 4, 2003
Posts
50,094
While researching I came upon this group, RTS:Reclaiming the Streets. It's a group that protests not with violence but with a big party. I like that idea.
As always someone does not, the FBI.

Check this out....and then go reclaim a street and dance the night away! :nana:

Is Dancing Terrorism?

by PB Floyd
1st July 2001

FBI brands Reclaim the Streets as "terrorists" - what the fuck have they been smoking?!

In another sign that the growing anti-capitalist, anarchist, anti-car movement is gaining effectiveness, the FBI recently listed Reclaim the Streets amongst the "Threats of Terrorism to the United States."

In a May 10 statement before the Senate Committees on Appropriations, Armed Services and Select Committee on Intelligence, FBI director Louis Freeh listed Reclaim the Streets as a "potential threat" to the United States along with assorted terrorists from Egypt and Lebanon.

The report reads in part: "Anarchists and extreme socialist groups - many of which, such as the Workers' World Party, Reclaim the Streets, and Carnival Against Capitalism - have an international presence and, at times, also represent a potential threat in the United States.

For example, anarchists, operating individually and in groups, caused much of the damage during the 1999 World Trade Organization ministerial meeting in Seattle."



The list also included "extreme fringes of animal rights, environmental, anti-nuclear, and other political and social movements" as well as the Animal Liberation Front (ALF) and the Earth Liberation Front (ELF).

Getting included in such a list is always both a good and a bad sign: it means we're doing something right and are threatening the system, but it also vastly increases the likelihood of infiltration, frame-ups based on planted evidence, government-sponsored internal movement "splits," police use of deadly force, etc.

Reclaim the Streets is actually more of a tactic than a movement or an organization. In 1996, activists in England decided to hold the first RTS "street party" by holding a day-time rave, complete with sound system, dancing, and party games, all with a political spin in a busy intersection.

The party aimed to temporarily "reclaim" the street from cars and point out how capitalism and car culture deprive people of public space and opportunities for public festivals.



The brilliant tactic rapidly caught on, and Reclaim the Streets street parties are now regularly carried out all over the globe.

RTS goes beyond the limitations of the traditional "march and rally" protest by building coalition with the rave/dance/youth scene to create something that is disruptive and public like a protest, but that is also joyous, fun and beautiful like a party.

Because it's fun and crosses over with the counter-culture, it's a lot easier for a street party to attract a large crowd.

A street party can effectively shut down a business district, in a positive, militant yet non-threatening way. Instead of handing out flyers about the world we want to build, street parties permit a revolutionary society to be conducted in the here and now, right on the street for all to see.

Any passer-by recognizes that dancing is a lot better looking and more fun that smog-choked asphalt. The asphalt is what capitalism is all about creating; a world of enjoyment, art, music and social intercourse is what we're all about creating.



So it is particularly ironic and interesting that the FBI considers these dance-based parties as a "terrorist" threat. Where is the terror? Where is the violence?

As far as we know, no RTS street party has ever
(1) exploded;
(2) emitted poison gas; or
(3) kidnapped anyone.

It is true that there has been flagrant
(1) dancing;
(2) loud pulsing music;
(3) flyers and banners;
(4) public art; (5) kissing.

While you might say it is scary seeing the weird guy with the spiky hair kissing the buff longshoreman type out in public, it isn't exactly terrorism.



Maybe the terrorism is because auto traffic gets blocked. We have noticed that a car bombing, like a street party, stops traffic until the mess can get cleaned up. But we thought the FBI only got involved when there was something seriously illegal going on or people getting hurt.

After wracking our brains, we figured it must be the video footage on Bay Area Reclaim the Streets' web page, which shows a car getting flipped over during the first street party held in the USA on May 16, 1998. http://xinet.com/rts

That street party was to protest the WTO, 18 months before Seattle. Just for the FBI's benefit (you're reading this because it has the newly "terrorist" word RTS in it, right?) that car was donated to us by a friend to help us block the street.

We drove it into position in the middle of the streets, let the air out of the tires, and flipped it. It was just a prop. Kinda like art, ya know? We didn't flip all the cars in Berkeley, as much as they might deserve it, because, ya know, we're about having a good party, not getting into fist fights with innocent people who happen to park in the wrong place at the wrong time.



Anyway, humor aside, the FBI terrorist listing is troubling. Getting branded a "terrorist" is usually a precursor to getting your ass shot off or thrown into prison for life, etc.

What's next, Food Not Bombs on the "10 Most Wanted List" for conspiracy to commit lunch?

At its heart, reclaiming the streets is radical and does have the potential to over throw the "American Way Of Life." What if instead of just having a street party once every three months with a few hundred people, there were thousands of autonomous cells everywhere organizing many street parties around the world every single day? Picture millions of people dropping out from capitalism living life for joy, not for their bosses.

Imagine people more interested in partying in the streets (and disrupting business as usual) than partying in some capitalist club.

Instead of billions of hours wasted on MTV in some suburb, what about billions of hours wasted partying down on the interstate highway while digging it up to plant crops, bringing the whole capitalist, techno machine to its knees! (While, ironically, listening to "techno" music!) I guess that's why the FBI is watching.
 
See, now how have I never heard of these parties? They sound absolutely top-bloody notch!

And we invented them as well! I feel so left out.

The Earl
 
Last edited:
Been there

I was on the edge of a 'Reclaim the Streets' protest in Central London a couple of years ago.

While the idea might seem innocuous, the participants were high on various substances and stopped traffic physically. If a vehicle refused to stop or took evasive action it was kicked or hit with placards on pieces of 2x4 timber smashing windows, lights etc.

At the time I was driving a wreck that my daughter wanted me to trade in for something better. I didn't look like a bloated capitalist and the car was making revolting noises so I was waved through the demonstrators lines. Several people had to be rescued by the police after their cars had been wrecked.

Non-violent might have been the intention but not the practice.

Og
 
Just goes to show you...no I'm not going to say what it shows.

Never mind.
 
oggbashan said:
I was on the edge of a 'Reclaim the Streets' protest in Central London a couple of years ago.

While the idea might seem innocuous, the participants were high on various substances and stopped traffic physically. If a vehicle refused to stop or took evasive action it was kicked or hit with placards on pieces of 2x4 timber smashing windows, lights etc.

At the time I was driving a wreck that my daughter wanted me to trade in for something better. I didn't look like a bloated capitalist and the car was making revolting noises so I was waved through the demonstrators lines. Several people had to be rescued by the police after their cars had been wrecked.

Non-violent might have been the intention but not the practice.

Og

Wouldn't that fall under the classification of terrorism? Using fear and violence to push a political point?
 
Colleen Thomas said:
Wouldn't that fall under the classification of terrorism? Using fear and violence to push a political point?

The UK classifies it as 'Anti-Social Behaviour'.

Og
 
zeb1094 said:
So is picking my nose in a crowded elevator!

Yes, but defined Anti-Social Behaviour can lead to an on-the-spot fine or arrest on a more serious charge.

Picking your nose is a faux-pas. Spitting directly into a policeman's face is a misdemeanor and is covered by Anti-Social Behaviour rules (and can be classed as assault, a much more serious offence).

Og
 
oggbashan said:
Yes, but defined Anti-Social Behaviour can lead to an on-the-spot fine or arrest on a more serious charge.

Picking your nose is a faux-pas. Spitting directly into a policeman's face is a misdemeanor and is covered by Anti-Social Behaviour rules (and can be classed as assault, a much more serious offence).

Og

Spitting directly into a policeman's face might also earn you a baton, depending on the time of day, whetehr you're drunk and disorderly and what kind of mood the policeman's in.

The Earl
 
Morris Dancing is permitted in the streets.

Under the Licensing Act 2003, Morris Dancing does not have to be licensed because the legislators decided that Morris Dancing is NOT entertainment.

Morris Dancing can be practised anywhere, at any time, by consenting adults without committing an offence under the Licensing Act. Offences against good taste are not covered.

Og
 
oggbashan said:
...the legislators decided that Morris Dancing is NOT entertainment.

Is it just me who finds that quite amusing?

The Earl
 
TheEarl said:
Is it just me who finds that quite amusing?
No. I like the idea of legislating something not entertaining. At least in England ;) .

Pear
 
perdita said:
No. I like the idea of legislating something not entertaining. At least in England ;) .

Pear

The Licensing Act covers all entertainment for the public - music, dancing etc. as well as on and off sales of alcohol, hot food and drink after 11pm and a few other things.

By specifically defining Morris Dancing as NOT entertainment, the legislators removed the necessity for the dancers to get a licence, at a cost, whenever they wanted to practice Morris Dancing in public. That definition met the pleas of the Morris Dancers at the expense of making them seem even more ridiculous than they already are.

Og
 
oggbashan said:
The Licensing Act covers all entertainment for the public - music, dancing etc. as well as on and off sales of alcohol, hot food and drink after 11pm and a few other things.

By specifically defining Morris Dancing as NOT entertainment, the legislators removed the necessity for the dancers to get a licence, at a cost, whenever they wanted to practice Morris Dancing in public. That definition met the pleas of the Morris Dancers at the expense of making them seem even more ridiculous than they already are.

Og


Oggs, what is morris dancing?
 
I am not answering that except with the quote:

'One should try anything once except incest and Morris Dancing'

Og
 
Here is a link:

Turn your volume control down first.

Morris

The source of the quote is at the end of the page.

Og
 
Back
Top