Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
WriterDom said:
*barf*WriterDom said:
Etoile said:*barf*
Eh, the *barf* was just because it was kind of saccharine. Cloying, if you will. Sappy, even. That's all I meant by the *barf* comment.WriterDom said:barf? Really? Well, the only vote that counts with me is Caspian. And all he knows is love.
Etoile said:okay, I admit it, I stopped reading after "collar of consideration"

serijules said:It's funny because in reading this, I feel the same way about "collars of consideration " and "training collars" as she does about cyber collars. (no comment on cyber collars). Oddly enough, the only place I have ever seen a collar of consideration or training collar is online. I have never met anyone in real life at all the clubs and parties I've been to and all the lifestyle folks I've met that did anything of this sort. Makes you wonder.
I've always felt you either collar someone or you don't. Why all these stages? It's like it came about because the lifestyle is trying so hard to mimic marriage by having dating and engagement stages (aka consideration and training). While the commitment level is very similar, it IS different and it bothers me that everything BDSM has to somehow be compared to a vanilla equivalent of it to be valid or understood.
It seems disrespectful to the permanence a collar represents to have a testing stage, a throwaway version. Things like this just have too much of a "game" feeling for me, and I'm not much of a fan of BDSM for fun and games, at least not where collars are involved. If you just play in the bedroom or for sexual fun, why even bring a collar into the equation?
The rest of the article is great. I just can't relate to the final stage blah blah part.
Just my opinion by the way, despite my feelings on the collars mentioned, I give them the same respect I would anyone else. If it works for you, I'm glad. I'm also entitled to my opinion and wanted to share why I don't like the concept.Ma'am has a girl she met online years ago and collared when she was new to the lifestyle, and the relationship is still intact. While I don't believe in cyber collars, I DO believe in and respect that they have a special relationship with one another.
HottieMama said:i've noticed several posters with trollish behavior here in this forum recently...guess it's that time of year...
Etoile said:Eh, the *barf* was just because it was kind of saccharine. Cloying, if you will. Sappy, even. That's all I meant by the *barf* comment.
okay, I admit it, I stopped reading after "collar of consideration"

FurryFury said:Not to take anything away from anyone who is into cyber collars but unless it was important to my Dom, I'd not want to go there. In my mind is a whole deal about living together or at least seeing each other in person on a regular basis being part of the whole collaring thing. That's just me though.
Also, again a "consideration" collar would have to be important to my Dom because to me that just smacks of an indecision that would drive me nuts.
I basically see a collar as the commitment symbol of a BDSM couple in RL.
If someone is into cyber or consideration collar and their SO is too, I've got no problem with that. I wish them much happiness. It's just not something I'm into for me.
Fury![]()
BiBunny said:No comment on the cyber collars thing because I know the firestorm that kind of thing always sets off around here, and I just ain't in the mood.
The only thing that really bugs me about that article is the whole "This Is How It's Done" tone. Does that mean that just because B. only gave me one collar, and he did it in the privacy of my apartment with no great ceremony or outrageous scene afterwards that I'm any less his slave? I'm a quiet, private person in my everyday life, so I appreciated the intimacy of it. I don't think there's any one collaring formula, and I don't think that Mistress Steel necessarily does, either, but that's the way the article reads nonetheless.
JupitersGirl said:I can understand the training collar, but what is the purpose of the consideration collar? "Stay away ... I'm thinking about taking this submissive on? Not my cup of tea, really.
Chris_Xavier said:Sounds like a lack of commitment on the Ds part whereas the s is all the way in. Not exactly a two-way street, huh?
WriterDom said:Offering a consideration collar to someone
A. you've never met
OR
B. You've only met once
Makes a lot of sense to me.
But different strokes for different folks.
Trajal said:Why on gods green earth would anyone ever offer a collar of any fucking kind to either of those circumstances.
You're on acid if you think that is realistic and normal.
wearTrajal said:Why on gods green earth would anyone ...
Edited for what some normal people think of D/s in general.Trajal said:... a collar of any fucking kind.
You're on acid if you think that is realistic and normal.
