Cut or Uncut- An Acquired Taste?

[Raimondin]

Ladies & Gents! How Do you like Your Tom, Dick & Harrys? Cut or Uncut? Apart from the (so-called) medical, and religious or cultural reasons, is there an actual aesthetic here? Most of my women friends, (straight) have preferred 'cut'. Many of my gay male friends have a preference for 'uncut'. And for some it didn't really matter. As a gay male myself I have to go along and say uncut is for me too, well, in fact my boyfriend is uncut, just happened that way. Myself, I'm cut. So for me, there's definitely been a difference in sensation, (Fantastic oral, anal) but also just from a visual aspect.
Curious how the Bi world feels about this....Comments? Reactions?...Bashings?...

"Peel the Banana, taste the fruit!"

 

[John Doe]

Ladies & Gents! How Do you like Your Tom, Dick & Harrys? Cut or Uncut? Apart from the (so-called) medical, and religious or cultural reasons, is there an actual aesthetic here? Most of my women friends, (straight) have preferred 'cut'. Many of my gay male friends have a preference for 'uncut'. And for some it didn't really matter. As a gay male myself I have to go along and say uncut is for me too, well, in fact my boyfriend is uncut, just happened that way. Myself, I'm cut. So for me, there's definitely been a difference in sensation, (Fantastic oral, anal) but also just from a visual aspect.
Curious how the Bi world feels about this....Comments? Reactions?...Bashings?...

"Peel the Banana, taste the fruit!"

I am bisexual and uncircumcised.



As far as preference, I think it's primarily an American thing that the majority prefers cut, because I believe over 90% of the world's total men are uncut. I can understand why someone would have an aesthetic preference (regarding feel and taste) one way or the other, as long as it's not a relationship make-or-break. I feel that would be petty and unfair no matter how you slice it (pun intended).

The disparity between the preferences of hetero women and gay men intrigues me.

Regarding sensation, the foreskin has a higher number and concentration of nerve endings (which I believe equates to higher sensitivity) than any other part of the penis. Additionally, being uncut usually means that the glans is more sensitive as well, since the foreskin protects the glans from bieing desensitized by rubbing against underwear and suchlike.

Now, higher sensitivity can be good in the first person, but not necessarily for anyone else. I will say that it can mean one is 'quicker on the draw,' but not by default. There are a number of things a man can do to increase his stamina (free of charge).

So I'm wondering what you mean by a difference in sensation with oral and anal sex. Were you circumcised as a man or were you refering to the different sensations you experience with your boyfriend's uncut cock?

 

[Raimondin]

Re: Re: Cut or Uncut- An Acquired Taste?

I am bisexual and uncircumcised.



As far as preference, I think it's primarily an American thing that the majority prefers cut, because I believe over 90% of the world's total men are uncut. I can understand why someone would have an aesthetic preference (regarding feel and taste) one way or the other, as long as it's not a relationship make-or-break. I feel that would be petty and unfair no matter how you slice it (pun intended).

The disparity between the preferences of hetero women and gay men intrigues me.

Regarding sensation, the foreskin has a higher number and concentration of nerve endings (which I believe equates to higher sensitivity) than any other part of the penis. Additionally, being uncut usually means that the glans is more sensitive as well, since the foreskin protects the glans from bieing desensitized by rubbing against underwear and suchlike.

Now, higher sensitivity can be good in the first person, but not necessarily for anyone else. I will say that it can mean one is 'quicker on the draw,' but not by default. There are a number of things a man can do to increase his stamina (free of charge).

So I'm wondering what you mean by a difference in sensation with oral and anal sex. Were you circumcised as a man or were you refering to the different sensations you experience with your boyfriend's uncut cock?

On that level, Yes.I 'was' referring to the sensations of anal penetration with an uncut cock, especially around the sphincter muscle/prostrate gland area where there is more sensation and depending on the girth can really feel the difference from a circumcised cock. My boyfriend is large, not so much in length but in girth. " Beer can" type, I think they call them. Hence because of this, he's had a hard time 'holding back' and it can be all too quick, so he's adjusted to controlling that by just, well, pushing in all the way instead of staying in the sphincter area. Logical. Plus my boyfriend has lots of foreskin, 'overhang', but it is retractable all the way back , but because of this all the more makes his glans ultra super sensitive since always sheathed, that sometimes he has to just pull out completely for a bit. Much easier for some reason on the oral side of things. And as you mentioned, it can mean "quicker on the draw". If that's what you meant...You're uncircumcised, so you understand...Not so with most of the 'cut' men in the past. Didn't have this situation...And yes. I 'was' circumcised as a teen, (14) And this is why I am aware of the differences myself...Definitely cut (no pun intended) the sensation factor in half!

Plus yeah, I agree. I think it's definitely an American thing that the majority prefers cut. Probably because it's the majority here in America. or the United States to be specific. You're right. I didn't realize most of the world is uncut. Fortunately, in my case this has never been a make-or break issue with my relationship. But just like there are 'size queens' there are defintely 'foreskin queens' in the Gay world. And it 'is' a visual thing in the sense that's there's a sort of mystery what lies behind the door (or foreskin), no matter how many times you've seen the same cock...As far as hetero/bi women, this 'does' interest me as well, in the sense that is it therefore the same 'aesthetic' with them as it is with us Gay men?....

 

[mystic_maiden32]

IMO it doesn't really matter....I have been with cut and uncut.

 

[John Doe]

Re: Re: Re: Cut or Uncut- An Acquired Taste?

I'm breaking this up some, hopefully to avoid confusion.

On that level, Yes.I 'was' referring to the sensations of anal penetration with an uncut cock, especially around the sphincter muscle/prostrate gland area where there is more sensation and depending on the girth can really feel the difference from a circumcised cock.

Okay, so just to be clear, when you say fantastic, you mean you prefer giving oral to and recieving anal sex from an uncut cock?

Oh, and I think you meant 'prostate' (though 'prostrate' means lying down, so it's not completely unrelated to the issue ).

My boyfriend is large, not so much in length but in girth. " Beer can" type, I think they call them. Hence because of this, he's had a hard time 'holding back' and it can be all too quick, so he's adjusted to controlling that by just, well, pushing in all the way instead of staying in the sphincter area. Logical. Plus my boyfriend has lots of foreskin, 'overhang', but it is retractable all the way back , but because of this all the more makes his glans ultra super sensitive since always sheathed, that sometimes he has to just pull out completely for a bit.

That sounds like a very nice cock for anal (if you don't mind my saying so). That is, wide but not overly long. Safer but stimulating for the reciever, especially if one enjoys larger girth.

Much easier for some reason on the oral side of things. And as you mentioned, it can mean "quicker on the draw". If that's what you meant...You're uncircumcised, so you understand...Not so with most of the 'cut' men in the past. Didn't have this situation...

Depending on what you mean by easier, I would imagine oral is easier to give to an uncut man because (all else being equal, i.e. lack of stamina training) they might climax faster.

And yes, by "quicker on the draw" I meant less stamina. Not necessarily a premature ejaculation problem, which can even affect circumcised men, but generally a difference.

As I said, the higher sensitivity can be compensated for, though, with various exercises. It's more mental than anything else, so it's not so much about desensitizing the penis, but learning to control the ejaculation (besides aiming ). And luckily that means one can enjoy the extra sensation while having a better chance at satisfying a partner.

And yes. I 'was' circumcised as a teen, (14) And this is why I am aware of the differences myself...Definitely cut (no pun intended) the sensation factor in half!

Do you miss it at all? All else being equal, that is for whatever reason you were circumcised, if that were not an issue, would you want it back? Forgive me if that question is too personal. I'm just very curious about how guys in these kinds of cases feel.

Plus yeah, I agree. I think it's definitely an American thing that the majority prefers cut. Probably because it's the majority here in America. or the United States to be specific.

It's probably due to early influence from Judaism. And no everyone, I'm not 'blaming the Jews', just sayin'.

You're right. I didn't realize most of the world is uncut. Fortunately, in my case this has never been a make-or break issue with my relationship. But just like there are 'size queens' there are defintely 'foreskin queens' in the Gay world. And it 'is' a visual thing in the sense that's there's a sort of mystery what lies behind the door (or foreskin), no matter how many times you've seen the same cock...As far as hetero/bi women, this 'does' interest me as well, in the sense that is it therefore the same 'aesthetic' with them as it is with us Gay men?....

That's a very interesting take on the visual difference. On the negative side of that, I've heard women complain that an uncut cock is "ugly." I try to shrug it of as simply an issue of what someone is accustomed to, but it still irks me.

However, to me the most compelling negative argument is that the taste is different, sometimes "metallic."

I have heard a variety of opinions though, from both hetero and bi women. Anywhere from not noticing any difference in stamina, or pointing out that a circumcised cock can be as unappealing due to bad hygiene as any smegma (which BTW, women also produce), to noticing a difference in sensation for them. As far as I can remember, they had more stimulation with an uncut cock, which is similar to what you were saying about the feeling of the anal sphincter/prostate.

There's an interesting thread about foreskin and circumcision on the GB which I will link here and if you don't mind I'd like to link this one to the GB. This one is obviously more focused on aesthetic preference, whereas the one I am linking addresses many of the other issues.

 

[John Doe]

IMO it doesn't really matter....I have been with cut and uncut.

Cool, but any comments on stamina, flavor or stimulation for you?

 

[Raimondin]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Cut or Uncut- An Acquired Taste?

I'm breaking this up some, hopefully to avoid confusion.



Okay, so just to be clear, when you say fantastic, you mean you prefer giving oral to and recieving anal sex from an uncut cock?

Oh, and I think you meant 'prostate' (though 'prostrate' means lying down, so it's not completely unrelated to the issue ).



That sounds like a very nice cock for anal (if you don't mind my saying so). That is, wide but not overly long. Safer but stimulating for the reciever, especially if one enjoys larger girth.



Depending on what you mean by easier, I would imagine oral is easier to give to an uncut man because (all else being equal, i.e. lack of stamina training) they might climax faster.

And yes, by "quicker on the draw" I meant less stamina. Not necessarily a premature ejaculation problem, which can even affect circumcised men, but generally a difference.

As I said, the higher sensitivity can be compensated for, though, with various exercises. It's more mental than anything else, so it's not so much about desensitizing the penis, but learning to control the ejaculation (besides aiming ). And luckily that means one can enjoy the extra sensation while having a better chance at satisfying a partner.



Do you miss it at all? All else being equal, that is for whatever reason you were circumcised, if that were not an issue, would you want it back? Forgive me if that question is too personal. I'm just very curious about how guys in these kinds of cases feel.




It's probably due to early influence from Judaism. And no everyone, I'm not 'blaming the Jews', just sayin'.



That's a very interesting take on the visual difference. On the negative side of that, I've heard women complain that an uncut cock is "ugly." I try to shrug it of as simply an issue of what someone is accustomed to, but it still irks me.

However, to me the most compelling negative argument is that the taste is different, sometimes "metallic."

I have heard a variety of opinions though, from both hetero and bi women. Anywhere from not noticing any difference in stamina, or pointing out that a circumcised cock can be as unappealing due to bad hygiene as any smegma (which BTW, women also produce), to noticing a difference in sensation for them. As far as I can remember, they had more stimulation with an uncut cock, which is similar to what you were saying about the feeling of the anal sphincter/prostate.

There's an interesting thread about foreskin and circumcision on the GB which I will link here and if you don't mind I'd like to link this one to the GB. This one is obviously more focused on aesthetic preference, whereas the one I am linking addresses many of the other issues.

Well, yeah. The stimulation factor is what I was referring to, yes. In other words, is there a better 'stimu/pleasure sensation' difference from an uncut cock vs from a cut one, (for both the giver and the receiver), In my case (as the receiver), yes, definitely better. which is what I was referring to by saying 'fantastic' and myself once being uncircumcised, I know what it's like for him . And when I said 'oral is easier' I was referring to the fact that it was easier for 'him' to control premature climax or ejac. As far whatever the medical books or docs might say about all the rest, I don't know, I'm not the expert...but you asked if i would want my foreskin back. Absolutely.........I hope this makes a little more sense....but more later...(sorry about the prostate/prostrate typo.....)

 

[fljim0121]

I prefer cut because first, the aesthetic factor, plus the only guy I was with who was uncut just tasted not very good in my opinion.

Of course, I'm basing that opinion on after being with only one uncut guy.

 

[uncutcokboy]

I am uncut, and I try to keep it clean! LOL

If anyone is interested in asking me questions, go ahead.. or PM me

 

[spewinyou]

i prefer a thick uncut one, the longer the skin the better...nice to nibble on, suck, stretch....and it's like slurping up the precum from a nice warm straw

 

[oxford_flame_uk]

I am cut and have been since I was very young so dont know any different. Have to say I prefer to suck an uncut cock - just love rolling that skin back!!

 

[dilne]

I am an uncut 19yr old college guy. Im kinda insecure about it because it seems to me that all the girls that I like and am friends with would definately want a cut guy(i have no facts to base this off of, just the idea that american white girls in general prefer cut). The girls that I like and are friends with are typical social popular girls. This is an insecurity of mine. My question is whether there are more cut or uncut guys in America, and about what ratio do you think it is?

 

[John Doe]

Could we post our gender and sexual orientation please? That was partly why Raimondin asked I believe.

 

[kalalau]

I'm bi and basically used to cut cocks. I was with an uncut guy once and it was very interesting. Fun to play with the foreskin. Definitely more aroma. It smelled a lot like a pussy!! The glands are the same, so it didn't surprise me much after thinking about it.....enjoying this thread!!!

 

[aconsenter]

Didn't know this was so technical. I am male, bi, and cut. Some uncuts look sexy and some don't, personal opinion here. As for oral, I enjoy doing uncuts by far, as the intact foreskin is so foreign to me that I love the feeling and look of sliding it up and down over the head as I lick and suck it. Some, maybe most it seems, can be kind of pumped into cumming quickly if you want to finish them fast.