Cruise control: enemy of the State?

Le Jacquelope

Loves Spam
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Posts
76,445
http://www.newsobserver.com/news/story/1363276.html

Ticket writing rises in a slump, study finds

Steve Harrison, Charlotte Observer Comment on this story
The economy is in the toilet. So do yourself a favor and ease up on the accelerator.

That's the indirect message of a recent study by two economists, who found that when government revenues dry up, police write more speeding tickets. After analyzing 14 years of data in North Carolina, the pair found that for every 1 percent drop in government revenue, the number of traffic tickets issued per capita increases by 30 percent the following year.

"It's significant," said University of Arkansas-Little Rock economics professor Gary A. Wagner, who co-wrote Red Ink in the Rearview Mirror: Local Fiscal Conditions and the Issuance of Traffic Tickets. "If there was no revenue for issuing tickets, I wouldn't expect the unemployment rate and revenue to be related."

The study, which analyzed data from 1989 to 2003, found the fewest number of tickets issued in North Carolina was in 2000, after nearly a decade of economic growth. Roughly 645,000 tickets were written that year. The highest number of tickets came two years later, when governments were trying to recover from the post-9/11 recession, and issued roughly 768,000.

Wagner said the study reinforced an accepted theory among economists: Incentives matter.

"If local governments are somehow involved in the revenue that gets generated, there's an incentive to get more revenue," Wagner said.

For some, the idea of government relying on lead-footed drivers to balance the budget isn't new. Drivers warn one another about small-town speed traps, and it's widely assumed that tickets are being written with more than public safety in mind.

Wagner said there are numerous anecdotes nationwide of such practices, such as the mayor of Nashville, Tenn., proposing two years ago a 33 percent increase in ticket revenue in his budget.

Wagner's co-author, Thomas Garrett, is an assistant vice president at the St. Louis Federal Reserve. North Carolina was chosen as a case study simply because the state had good data.

During the study period, the state issued 11 tickets for every 100 residents. Dare County had the highest rate, at 29 per 100. Caldwell County was the lowest, at 6 per 100.
 
It's not cruise control that wrecks your car; it's drivers using cruise control that wreck your car. :)
 
Last edited:
Speeding tickets are a joke, since most people are speeding most of the time anyway. Around here, they're putting up radar cameras to ticket drivers by mail. Cameras are set to trip when a car is going eleven miles an hour over the speed limit. That means if you're going nine miles an hour over the limit, you don't get ticketed, even though you're speeding.

What's even funnier is the fact that the conservatives in the Arizona state legislature are threatening to derail the radar cameras, claiming they're an invasion of civil liberties. This coming from the party that routinely tramples civil liberties? How very strange. I think the conservatives would rather balance the budget by cutting social programs than by ticketing speeders. (I guess being the party of "law and order" is a subjective exercise, depending upon which laws one wishes to ignore.)

While I agree that speed traps suck, and overly cautious speed limits are a nuisance, the fact remains - speeding is an expensive luxury. If you can't afford it, don't do it.
 
Speeding tickets are a joke, since most people are speeding most of the time anyway. Around here, they're putting up radar cameras to ticket drivers by mail. Cameras are set to trip when a car is going eleven miles an hour over the speed limit. That means if you're going nine miles an hour over the limit, you don't get ticketed, even though you're speeding.

What's even funnier is the fact that the conservatives in the Arizona state legislature are threatening to derail the radar cameras, claiming they're an invasion of civil liberties. This coming from the party that routinely tramples civil liberties? How very strange. I think the conservatives would rather balance the budget by cutting social programs than by ticketing speeders. (I guess being the party of "law and order" is a subjective exercise, depending upon which laws one wishes to ignore.)

While I agree that speed traps suck, and overly cautious speed limits are a nuisance, the fact remains - speeding is an expensive luxury. If you can't afford it, don't do it.

If all they have is the photo of the license and the radar record, it may well be a violation of civil liberties. Tickets are written against drivers and if they can't prove the owner was driving, they shouldn't issue a ticket. If they can prove the owner was diriving it would be different.
 
Speeding tickets are a joke, since most people are speeding most of the time anyway. Around here, they're putting up radar cameras to ticket drivers by mail. Cameras are set to trip when a car is going eleven miles an hour over the speed limit. That means if you're going nine miles an hour over the limit, you don't get ticketed, even though you're speeding.

What's even funnier is the fact that the conservatives in the Arizona state legislature are threatening to derail the radar cameras, claiming they're an invasion of civil liberties. This coming from the party that routinely tramples civil liberties? How very strange. I think the conservatives would rather balance the budget by cutting social programs than by ticketing speeders. (I guess being the party of "law and order" is a subjective exercise, depending upon which laws one wishes to ignore.)

While I agree that speed traps suck, and overly cautious speed limits are a nuisance, the fact remains - speeding is an expensive luxury. If you can't afford it, don't do it.
And it's a waste of gas, too. Slowing down to about 60mph is a good way to save gasoline due to aerodynamic drag.
 
I'll have to properly credit the Gubment here.

Wouldn't that be the most responsible thing they could possibly do when revenues dry up?

If only the current Corporate greed were so thrifty.
 
If all they have is the photo of the license and the radar record, it may well be a violation of civil liberties. Tickets are written against drivers and if they can't prove the owner was driving, they shouldn't issue a ticket. If they can prove the owner was driving it would be different.

They do it here, mind you its not at 11 miles over. Hubby got one at 4 miles over. 44 in a 40 zone and he got one. He received the notice by mail and it asks you to verify it was you and if not you name who was driving and their license number and then they get the ticket and asked to verify they were driving. Once we sent in who it was they then sent him the final thing saying he had been ticketed but we already paid for the ticket after the first notice came through.
 
They do it here, mind you its not at 11 miles over. Hubby got one at 4 miles over. 44 in a 40 zone and he got one. He received the notice by mail and it asks you to verify it was you and if not you name who was driving and their license number and then they get the ticket and asked to verify they were driving. Once we sent in who it was they then sent him the final thing saying he had been ticketed but we already paid for the ticket after the first notice came through.

That is exactly what they are counting on. Most people will just pay the fine and get on with their lives.
 
Back
Top