"CRT isn't taught in Virginia"

You keep demanding the wrong thing. CRT as a subject isn't taught directly, it's used as an interpretive lens and is ingrained into students insidiously. It's like in Nazi Germany, where it's doubtful there was ever a class called "anti-semitism." Yet the Nazi ideology taught everything through that lens, so that even math and science were twisted to ingrain Jew-hatred into kids.

That's how CRT is being used. This guy explains:

https://www.edweek.org/leadership/o...eory-isnt-a-curriculum-its-a-practice/2021/05
He teachers graduate level courses, not K-12 courses. From your link.


"In the course about racial inequality in K-12 public education that I designed and teach for graduate public-policy students, CRT is a valuable framework for helping students identify how law and policy can either entrench or eradicate historic racial inequities in education."
 
Want to answer the question or are you just going to join the rest of the baboons?

I was mocking you...dipshit.

Your obsession with CRT is quite frankly the funniest Trumpian shit since Qanon.

But please...continue to believe that I have any sincerity in discussion in the matter.
 
That doesn't mean it isn't being instilled in kids. It is. Insidiously.

Exactly what do you have against teaching children that racism was and is a problem in our society? How else do you ever intend to defeat racism?

Not to mention that's still not even really what CRT is. CRT pertains directly to the study of law. It's reasonable to say teaching children that racism was a real thing that has influenced our country for the worse is aligned with CRT, but it's still not the same thing. More fundamentally, though, I find it telling that you have a problem with what you think CRT is. Even setting aside that you're wrong about that, I don't see why anyone wouldn't want our children to learn that racism is bad. In fact, I can only think of one reason why you would and that...does not reflect well at all on you.
 
Funny, they taught all of that in my High School
which implies that you were less than a 'C' student...


Then again, stupid people tend to argue with memes and pictures.
 
Funny, they taught all of that in my High School
which implies that you were less than a 'C' student...


Then again, stupid people tend to argue with memes and pictures.

That's the point, Chief.

They USED to teach it when you were back in school, but the Radical Right realizes this unpleasantness makes churning out little racists difficult, so now they're trying to bowdlerize American history by removing anything and everything that might reflect poorly on white people.

P.S. A college-educated jabroni who used to claim "1 times anything is 1" shouldn't be lecturing others on stupidity. Just sayin'.....
 
.
A: America WAS founded as a white misogynistic racist sexist state, and American institutions are STILL "shot through" with racism, misogyny, and bigotry. Only a Deplorable would dismiss the evidence provided by the verifiable statistical disparities that are a product of institutional racism, misogyny, and bigotry.

B: CRT is NOT being taught in K-12 schools.

C: Deplorables are WRONG.

This is the correct answer.
 

response:

"TEACHING ABOUT HOW RACISM HELD BACK AMERICANS OF A DIFFERENT SKIN COLOR/CLASS/CASTE/RELIGION/SEXUAL ORIENTATION/GENDER IS RACIST!!!!!!"

"WHY COULDN'T YOU PEOPLE BE SATISFIED WITH NAMING HOLIDAYS AND MEMORIALIZING STREETS AFTER THE PEOPLE WE MURDERED FOR PROTESTING FOR THEIR CIVIL RIGHTS? THAT SHOULD'VE BEEN ENOUGH FOR YOU!!!!"

"ARRRRGHHHH?!!!!! ARRRRRRGGGGGH!!!! OOOOOAAAAARRRGGGGHHHH!!!" (fires guns into sky in an outburst of hyper-masculine frustration with no healthy outlet for healing)
 
Oh god Adrina in with the lies.

CRT has nothing to do with history, and everything to do with hating white people.

I think she is correct....we have already seen the attempt to teach "alternative facts" for the Holocaust.

Teaching "alternative facts" for actual US history is baked into the system. It is what I was taught....about a paragraph on slavery and Martin Luther King....then we move on to other non-relevant or real history around slavery, emancipation, civil rights(protest movements.over the entire US history culminating in the Civil Right Act) and especially recent current events like the killing of black folks by govt officials(some police).
 
I think she is correct....

Then explain why CRT has anything to do with basic US history??

we have already seen the attempt to teach "alternative facts" for the Holocaust.

Teaching "alternative facts" for actual US history is baked into the system. It is what I was taught....about a paragraph on slavery and Martin Luther King....then we move on to other non-relevant or real history around slavery, emancipation, civil rights(protest movements.over the entire US history culminating in the Civil Right Act) and especially recent current events like the killing of black folks by govt officials(some police).

^^ Has literally nothing to do with CRT.

You don't need to put everything through the lens of race and hyper-racialize everything while promoting hatred of whitey, to teach basic history.

You just need a regular ass history curriculum. That's it. No special bullshit needed.

There is ONLY one reason to racialize everything and demonize any single race as baddy oppressors and other races innocent victims of the other, of the baddies (clearly as determined by their race) and that is because you're a racist piece of shit.

The end. :)
 
Back
Top