Creationism.

[phrodeau]

Well, my substantial genitalia is the largest thing in the Penis Hall of Fame, It is now the Universal Idol of Phallicism. Metaphorically speaking, It has been the sun that brought light to many a maiden of darkened soul. Too, I am quite certain it has a decided impact on the gravitational stability of the earth. For I have been told that it was what made their world go round, and I never doubt the word of a thoroughly fulfilled woman.

Lah de dah. My dick shows up on Google Maps.

 

[Weezard]

Lah de dah. My dick shows up on Google Maps.

I have a WWI Marine officer's sword that still carries telltale signs of useful action. Could we get phrodeau's Lincoln Log in front of it.

 

[TeslaRose]

You would know no fun or pleasure if it were not for my nibbling on your ears, and gently stroking you, deep inside. Your newest attire is fully transparent, and the view from afar is awesome. Can't you feel my hot breath on your skin? Just think what ecstasy you will know when I reach out and touch you.

weezard tightened his grip on the armrests of the tattered office chair that had served as his trusted ass chalice for the past 38.7 years. he let out a little moan when he opened his eyes and saw the shiny sea of dark hair that lay in tendrils across his lap. she was still there. he hadn't dreamt her up like all the others. she was here, in front of him, her lips and tongue like white hot velvet sliding along the shaft of his tumescent cock. Her mouth was wet and needy and surrounded him completely in a way that his own hands never could. "good gods," he thought to himself, his hips bucking upwards involuntarily, revelling in the delicate choking sound she made when his cock slid further down her throat, "just....wow." he'd always known his first time with a woman would be something special. in his mind's eye, he had watched himself take a forceful lead, knotting his fingers in her hair, whispering into her ear with a fevered urgency what a little whore she was, his whore. in his reality, he found himself unable to form coherent words, but mentally congratulated himself after he was able to muster what he considered to be a very masculine gurgle.

tesla peered up at him from between his legs, her eyes shining like jewels and her lips wet and glistening around the base of his rock-hard member. her face was wanting and alluring; it was as though she were waiting for something, for a response, for permission...breathless and anxious for what could possibly come next, weezard managed a barely perceptible nod, his muscles clenched and body trembling. tesla smiled.

he let out a small squeak as he felt her teeth scrape against the skin of his cock.

 

[Recidiva]

think that carbon-dating is quite widely considered to be accurate, and has been the standard for some time now. i think if there were more legitimate opposition, it would be explored in the scientific community. what would it take for to accept the age calculations as true? what do scientists have to gain by advancing the theory of evolution as opposed to creationism?

This.

Carbon dating doesn't require anything more to justify its accuracy. Refusing to explore the subject or learn the science doesn't represent a valid school of thought, it represents denial and determined ignorance. It's not open to interpretation like "What did Jesus mean when he said that."

It's a fact. You deal with facts or you voluntarily remain ignorant to serve a fantasy set forth thousands of years ago. I can forgive people two thousand years ago for not knowing the answers and making things up. People in the modern world have no such excuses.

 

[Tryharder62]

thank you so much for answering

i think that carbon-dating is quite widely considered to be accurate, and has been the standard for some time now. i think if there were more legitimate opposition, it would be explored in the scientific community. what would it take for to accept the age calculations as true? what do scientists have to gain by advancing the theory of evolution as opposed to creationism?

i agree that animals can teach us and comfort us. i just think that is a byproduct of their existence rather than their purpose

again, thank you for your insights! no disclaimer needed

"Comparing the remaining C fraction of a sample to that EXPECTED from atmospheric C allows the age of the sample to be ESTIMATED." What if scientist A expected that for this period of time the atmospheric C was one way and another scientest expected that it was another. The nobel prize winner actually won it for accurately calculating the time of a something that the time was already known, all the conditions were known. That is like me accurately knowing that Weezard cheats on his beloved. Do I get a prize. It also amazed me that estimation is the new scientific marker of truth.

 

[Tryharder62]

This.

Carbon dating doesn't require anything more to justify its accuracy. Refusing to explore the subject or learn the science doesn't represent a valid school of thought, it represents denial and determined ignorance. It's not open to interpretation like "What did Jesus mean when he said that."

It's a fact. You deal with facts or you voluntarily remain ignorant to serve a fantasy set forth thousands of years ago. I can forgive people two thousand years ago for not knowing the answers and making things up. People in the modern world have no such excuses.

Not all creationists have refused to study the science. In my above post I talked about the theory being about estimation and expectations. I like to see the absolute truth in front of me like the words of Jesus.

In my opinion with further scientific research the theories will not be as polar opposites as they seem.

While I like to engage in my share of fantasies. My beliefs in the bible and Jesus aren't among them.

 

[Recidiva]

"Comparing the remaining C fraction of a sample to that EXPECTED from atmospheric C allows the age of the sample to be ESTIMATED." What is scientist A expected that for this period of time the atmospheric C was one way and another scientest expected that it was another. The nobel prize winner actually won it for accurately calculating the time of a something that the time was already known, all the conditions were known. That is like me accurately knowing that Weezard cheats on his beloved. Do I get a prize. It also amazed me that estimation is the new scientific marker of truth.

No, "expected" and "estimated" have to do with the margin of error. That's not to be translated as "we're guessing."

These are repeatable and accurate tests. The "estimated" answers will come in within margin of error and won't, for instance, decide that the Shroud of Turin originated repeatedly in different time frames. It will give a window of origin.

"The results of radiocarbon measurements at Arizona, Oxford and Zurich yield a calibrated calendar age range with at least 95% confidence for the linen of the Shroud of Turin of AD 1260 - 1390 (rounded down/up to nearest 10 yr). These results therefore provide conclusive evidence that the linen of the Shroud of Turin is medieval."

 

[Recidiva]

Not all creationists have refused to study the science. In my above post I talked about the theory being about estimation and expectations. I like to see the absolute truth in front of me like the words of Jesus.

In my opinion with further scientific research the theories will not be as polar opposites as they seem.

While I like to engage in my share of fantasies. My beliefs in the bible and Jesus aren't among them.

Jesus said...nothing about the age of the Universe.

He did say Render unto Caesar. Give what belongs to the government to the government. Grant what belongs to science, to science.

 

[Tryharder62]

No, "expected" and "estimated" have to do with the margin of error. That's not to be translated as "we're guessing."

These are repeatable and accurate tests. The "estimated" answers will come in within margin of error and won't, for instance, decide that the Shroud of Turin originated repeatedly in different time frames. It will give a window of origin.

"The results of radiocarbon measurements at Arizona, Oxford and Zurich yield a calibrated calendar age range with at least 95% confidence for the linen of the Shroud of Turin of AD 1260 - 1390 (rounded down/up to nearest 10 yr). These results therefore provide conclusive evidence that the linen of the Shroud of Turin is medieval."

But again this is with conditions known after the death of Jesus 1260-1390 and they only hit it 95%. Go as far back as some scientist want to about some fossil remains and I think it is more like let's expect and estimate this and no one will really know so who cares.

 

[Recidiva]

But again this is with conditions known after the death of Jesus 1260-1390 and they only hit it 95%. Go as far back as some scientist want to about some fossil remains and I think it is more like let's expect and estimate this and no one will really know so who cares.

I care. This, exactly this, is why religion can encourage people to be ignorant and proudly so.

 

[Sean]

"Comparing the remaining C fraction of a sample to that EXPECTED from atmospheric C allows the age of the sample to be ESTIMATED." What if scientist A expected that for this period of time the atmospheric C was one way and another scientest expected that it was another. The nobel prize winner actually won it for accurately calculating the time of a something that the time was already known, all the conditions were known. That is like me accurately knowing that Weezard cheats on his beloved. Do I get a prize. It also amazed me that estimation is the new scientific marker of truth.

I really hope you don't have children.

 

[Tryharder62]

I care. This, exactly this, is why religion can encourage people to be ignorant and proudly so.

I care too. I don't understand why scientiests have to fear creationism? I say bring science on. Keep studying. I don't think religion encourages people to be ignorant and proudly so. I think both sides have people that are ignorant and proudly so just because they choose to stay in their own little worlds. I think to some science is their religion.

I mean look at us. I love debating with you. You are very intelligent and still find time to do the scripture happy dance.

 

[Tryharder62]

I really hope you don't have children.

Yep 2. Great kids. Don't even go there. They were raised to be open minded and at least listen to what other's have to say. Even when they want to roll over laughing at the obsurdity.

 

[Recidiva]

I care too. I don't understand why scientiests have to fear creationism? I say bring science on. Keep studying. I don't think religion encourages people to be ignorant and proudly so. I think both sides have people that are ignorant and proudly so just because they choose to stay in their own little worlds. I think to some science is their religion.

I mean look at us. I love debating with you. You are very intelligent and still find time to do the scripture happy dance.

You've seen that I have studied religion. I have also studied science.

The way you express your "understanding" of carbon dating shows that you can't discuss it intelligently.

I travel lots of worlds, I just don't have a vested interest in keeping one insulated and ignorant because otherwise it might lose its mojo.

It may not affect your life in any way. But if you had a teacher that encouraged that sort of lack of thought and when it's passed along to kids who are not taught to think rigorously about science but are taught to dismiss bits of it when it suits them to prop up a religion that needs no propping up, I'm offended.

You have free will. You can stuff your brains with whatever you choose. It's just a dumb, ignorant thing to do and I'm grateful that although you've decided to stuff your ears with holy cotton, other people can choose to hear.

Eventually this is what makes religion that doesn't reform, obstructionist and obsolete. This is exactly why people who are not religious get offended and angry.

This is why literal belief is contributing to ignorance instead of enriching our understanding of what life is, whether God created it or not.

 

[phrodeau]

I care too. I don't understand why scientiests have to fear creationism? I say bring science on. Keep studying. I don't think religion encourages people to be ignorant and proudly so. I think both sides have people that are ignorant and proudly so just because they choose to stay in their own little worlds. I think to some science is their religion.

I mean look at us. I love debating with you. You are very intelligent and still find time to do the scripture happy dance.

Scientists don't fear creationism. Scientists have a high level of certainty that creationism is not scientific, carries no weight of evidence, and has no place in a science curriculum.

Rational people have a reasonable fear that irrational people are trying to indoctrinate their children.

 

[Sean]

You've seen that I have studied religion. I have also studied science.

The way you express your "understanding" of carbon dating shows that you can't discuss it intelligently.

I travel lots of worlds, I just don't have a vested interest in keeping one insulated and ignorant because otherwise it might lose its mojo.

It may not affect your life in any way. But if you had a teacher that encouraged that sort of lack of thought and when it's passed along to kids who are not taught to think rigorously about science but are taught to dismiss bits of it when it suits them to prop up a religion that needs no propping up, I'm offended.

You have free will. You can stuff your brains with whatever you choose. It's just a dumb, ignorant thing to do and I'm grateful that although you've decided to stuff your ears with holy cotton, other people can choose to hear.

Eventually this is what makes religion that doesn't reform, obstructionist and obsolete. This is exactly why people who are not religious get offended and angry.

This is why literal belief is contributing to ignorance instead of enriching our understanding of what life is, whether God created it or not.

Agreed. Which is why, if she's teaching that shit to her kids, it's tantamount to child abuse.

 

[Oscuridad]

Darling, you would never be able to get on my nerves or under my skin with your meager skills. You only damage yourself in the attempt.
I suspect you are a tease, but are unskilled in its finer details. It is, after all, both an art and a science.
Taking unfair advantage of you would be nothing short of a celestial sport attentively watched by the gods. Too, my mouth waters at the thought of it. A wholly delicious fair maiden whose parts were especially made for me to savor. My dear, being eaten alive is such a once in a life-time experience.

And so is set the seal on your divinity, lest it be the divinity of fools.

 

[Oscuridad]

I was talking about the church going cleaning lady job. I looked back and saw that you called Oscuridad darling too. Two timed by Weezard. Heartbroken, but if you pay well for cleaning I may be able to do get a two speed vibrator.

Didn't it just?

 

[Oscuridad]

Not all creationists have refused to study the science. In my above post I talked about the theory being about estimation and expectations. I like to see the absolute truth in front of me like the words of Jesus.

In my opinion with further scientific research the theories will not be as polar opposites as they seem.

While I like to engage in my share of fantasies. My beliefs in the bible and Jesus aren't among them.

This sort of thinking might hinder your scientific pursuits.

 

[dolf]

the smart people should feel guilty for spending so long humiliating a dim person, even if the dim person is too dim to realise their humiliation.

 

[Sean]

the smart people should feel guilty for spending so long humiliating a dim person, even if the dim person is too dim to realise their humiliation.

I kinda pointed it out. Repeatedly.

 

[Recidiva]

the smart people should feel guilty for spending so long humiliating a dim person, even if the dim person is too dim to realise their humiliation.

*raspberries*

 

[hogjack]

Jesus said...nothing about the age of the Universe.

I recall him saying something like "...3-to-5,000 give or take...". I think it's in the Book of Peter. Probably.

God breathed the Truth into the hands of those who wrote about Jesus so Jesus' Earth-age estimate must be close to accurate.

 

[Oscuridad]

the smart people should feel guilty for spending so long humiliating a dim person, even if the dim person is too dim to realise their humiliation.

I'm really not spending that much time on it.

But while you're here... Would you happen to have any decorative masks that you could wear for my Masked passions thread?

 

[Recidiva]

I recall him saying something like "...3-to-5,000 give or take...". I think it's in the Book of Peter. Probably.

God breathed the Truth into the hands of those who wrote about Jesus so Jesus' Earth-age estimate must be close to accurate.

*blackberries*