cops say a federal ban on so-called “assault weapons” isn’t the answer.

koalabear

~Armed and Fuzzy~
Joined
Mar 14, 2001
Posts
101,964
http://www.policeone.com/police-pro...enforcement-survey-results-executive-summary/

More than 91 percent of respondents say it would either have no effect or a negative effect in reducing violent crime. This is an overwhelming response by those whose job it is to actually deal with this issue on the front lines.

Instead, it is interesting to note that armed citizens show up frequently as a deciding factor in reducing the carnage from a mass murder situation; proactive choices dominate over gun and magazine restrictions and bans.

More than 91 percent of respondents support the concealed carry of firearms by civilians who have not been convicted of a felony and/or not been deemed psychologically/medically incapable.

A full 86 percent feel that casualties would have been reduced or avoided in recent tragedies like Newtown and Aurora if a legally-armed citizen was present (casualties reduced: 80 percent; avoided altogether: 60 percent).

http://www.policeone.com/Gun-Legisl...d-citizens-the-best-solution-to-gun-violence/
 
Back
Top