eroticspank
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2004
- Posts
- 4,053
Well said!I know this is a zombie thread, but I still didn’t want to scroll past without any reaction.
I don’t think it is different really, but there are absolutely a lot of people who have double standards about this and other things.
I have been in similar situations, being in bed with someone, in what was supposed to be no-sexual, but where he took initiative to make it sexual.
In one case I stopped it and said I did not want to go down that road and it was accepted.
In another case, we did go down that road, hrmm, twice actually.
I consider it consesual, without a word having been spoken about it, because there was plenty of space and opportunity to tell him no.
To me his initiative was a question and my leaning into it was the answer. There is a lot of room for misunderstandings though, so risky behaviour with a relative stranger.
Agreed.
An involountary, physical response is not consent.
I think the biggest risk with this kind of unclear communication about consent is in cases like this, when someone feels unable to say no and the other is unaware about it.
Because she might well have thought that you would say no if you wanted to stop it.
I think this is one case where there might be a double standard for many. It is often talked about women feeling unable to say no out of fear, but lots of people seem unaware that men can feel the same way, because they are afraid of being accused of something, or because there are some scary women out there too.
In any case (and I know that this is very controversial for many), I think there is room for misunderstandings and plain old human incompetence between consent and non-consent.
Aiming for more clear communication and getting rid of some of those double standards, especially around people you don’t know very well, is probably the best way to avoid those fuck ups.
ES