MarcvsAvrelivs
Really Experienced
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2020
- Posts
- 119
"In the first decades of the twentieth century, the idea that individuals should be systematically evaluated and selected based on their ability rather than wealth, class, or political connections, led to significant changes in selection techniques at all levels of American society. The Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) revolutionized college admissions by allowing elite universities to find and recruit talented students from beyond the boarding schools of New England. Following the adoption of the SAT, aptitude tests such as Wonderlic (1936), Graduate Record Examination (1936), Army General Classification Test (1941), and Law School Admission Test (1948) swept the United States. Spurred on by the demands of two world wars, this system of institutional management electrified the Tennessee Valley, created the first atom bomb, invented the transistor, and put a man on the moon.
"By the 1960s, the systematic selection for competence came into direct conflict with the political imperatives of the civil rights movement. During the period from 1961 to 1972, a series of Supreme Court rulings, executive orders, and laws—most critically, the Civil Rights Act of 1964—put meritocracy and the new political imperative of protected-group diversity on a collision course. Administrative law judges have accepted statistically observable disparities in outcomes between groups as prima facie evidence of illegal discrimination. The result has been clear: any time meritocracy and diversity come into direct conflict, diversity must take priority.
"The resulting norms have steadily eroded institutional competency, causing America’s complex systems to fail with increasing regularity. In the language of a systems theorist, by decreasing the competency of the actors within the system, formerly stable systems have begun to experience normal accidents at a rate that is faster than the system can adapt. The prognosis is harsh but clear: either selection for competence will return or America will experience devolution to more primitive forms of civilization and loss of geopolitical power."
https://www.palladiummag.com/2023/06/01/complex-systems-wont-survive-the-competence-crisis/
When any standard will do, a low one is just as good as a high one and easier to achieve.
When your goal is to choose people by skin color, religion or economic status, you're most certainly going to discourage those to whom meritocracy still matters. Ironicaly Asians are regarded as "white" in this effort.
I did a search on "Meritocracy" and even at DuckDuckGo, it was just pages and pages of disparaging links towards meritocracy, and the biggest drawback is that it's labeled "Racist." Mayor Pete is saying that Conservatives are targeting the sexual weirdos because of their extremism, and guess what? Parents have been added to the big list of extremist groups for challenging the woke nonsense. The people boycotting Bug Light, Target and the Dodgers and now being labeled as terrorists too (parents again). The woke better wake up. The tail cannot way the dog for long.
The wheels on the bus don't go round and round when they have been stolen and your bus left up on blocks.
"By the 1960s, the systematic selection for competence came into direct conflict with the political imperatives of the civil rights movement. During the period from 1961 to 1972, a series of Supreme Court rulings, executive orders, and laws—most critically, the Civil Rights Act of 1964—put meritocracy and the new political imperative of protected-group diversity on a collision course. Administrative law judges have accepted statistically observable disparities in outcomes between groups as prima facie evidence of illegal discrimination. The result has been clear: any time meritocracy and diversity come into direct conflict, diversity must take priority.
"The resulting norms have steadily eroded institutional competency, causing America’s complex systems to fail with increasing regularity. In the language of a systems theorist, by decreasing the competency of the actors within the system, formerly stable systems have begun to experience normal accidents at a rate that is faster than the system can adapt. The prognosis is harsh but clear: either selection for competence will return or America will experience devolution to more primitive forms of civilization and loss of geopolitical power."
https://www.palladiummag.com/2023/06/01/complex-systems-wont-survive-the-competence-crisis/
When any standard will do, a low one is just as good as a high one and easier to achieve.
When your goal is to choose people by skin color, religion or economic status, you're most certainly going to discourage those to whom meritocracy still matters. Ironicaly Asians are regarded as "white" in this effort.
I did a search on "Meritocracy" and even at DuckDuckGo, it was just pages and pages of disparaging links towards meritocracy, and the biggest drawback is that it's labeled "Racist." Mayor Pete is saying that Conservatives are targeting the sexual weirdos because of their extremism, and guess what? Parents have been added to the big list of extremist groups for challenging the woke nonsense. The people boycotting Bug Light, Target and the Dodgers and now being labeled as terrorists too (parents again). The woke better wake up. The tail cannot way the dog for long.
The wheels on the bus don't go round and round when they have been stolen and your bus left up on blocks.