SlutAddicted
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2014
- Posts
- 3,773
Ask yourselves the question. Is the violence of a slave against a slave owner as bad or worse than the violence of a slave owner against a slave? Liberal moralists will say yes, all violence is the same, or say that the slave owner's violence is worse in words while lamenting that there isn't "peace" between slave and slave owner.
These liberals are pathetic. The Republicans of the 1860s-1870s should have been utterly ruthless during Reconstruction, merciless.
Sorry hun but that is an entirely bullshit analogy.
Israel was founded from a position of relative weakness. In 1949 they established their state and while I get the disagreement over whether that was just (no they did not invade and occupy an existing sovereign country - it is far more complex than that) at the time their only desire was to live there in peace. Every single major conflict in the ensuing years was instigated by the notionally stronger Arab nations seeking to destroy them. They were the dominant parties seeking to destroy Israel who pushed them back and eventually established a nation able to keep them at bay.
In doing so they did not seek to destroy the way their enemies did. What you see now is the underdog who had to fight to survive and rather than simply murder their enemies (the Palestinian's preferred route) is struggling to find a way to come to terms with them.
You can't just watch 10 seconds of a fight and assumes the person winning is the bad guy and the instigator because you oppose violence.
I don't think all violence is the same. That is a naive silly notion for privileged westerners. The creation of Israel was a political act, which albeit controversial was non-violent. Palestinians and their Arab neighbours initiated the violence and called for the destruction of Israel. In response Israel defended itself - they defended against the violence through multiple wars. Violence is never good but portraying them as the oppressor for being good at defending themselves from an enemy that openly intends to murder them a the first opportunity is stupid.

