eric_erosfan
Cunning Linguist
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2023
- Posts
- 3,756
In Gaza stupid fucking MAGAtard.There’s a famine in Flagstaff?
Try to keep up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In Gaza stupid fucking MAGAtard.There’s a famine in Flagstaff?
I do keep up. There's no famine in Gaza.In Gaza stupid fucking MAGAtard.
Try to keep up.
Lol.I do keep up. There's no famine in Gaza.
Except the hostages are being starvedI do keep up. There's no famine in Gaza.
Famine has struck Gaza, says global hunger monitorExcept the hostages are being starved
Unsettling when you find out you are just like the stupid fucking MAGAtard cult huh?I do keep up. There's no famine in Gaza.
Sadly I fear that the people who most need to read it will dismiss it out of hand. The genocide slur is attractive to antizionists because it lets them feel morally superior. Admitting that they were duped requires a level of humility that few people possess.Definitely a must read article.
I would only add:
In that same time frame (a few weeks after 10/7) as mentioned in the article where the clearly premeditated organized rallies, etc, took place, Hamas leadership made a visit to RUSSIA for "some reason" (and 10/7 just so happens to be Putin’s birthday…):
https://www.reuters.com/world/hamas...g-moscow-russian-foreign-ministry-2023-10-26/
![]()
![]()
We. Told. Them. So.
![]()
Sadly I fear that the people who most need to read it will dismiss it out of hand. The genocide slur is attractive to antizionists because it lets them feel morally superior. Admitting that they were duped requires a level of humility that few people possess.
I do agree that we can see the hand of Russia in instigating the Gaza war. Gaza and Ukraine are linked. Every Ukrainian victory diminishes Russia’s ability to fund the propaganda against Israel. A crippled Iran can’t supply Russia with drones.
The thread isn't closed, obviously. The petulant creator renamed it in an attempt to halt its course.Was this thread closed because the subject is too toxic?
Petulant isn’t a word I would associate with him, but it is a great word. I’ll have to read what the thread is about and find something trivial to comment on. Thank you!!The thread isn't closed, obviously. The petulant creator renamed it in an attempt to halt its course.
https://www.reuters.com/world/middl...de-gaza-scholars-association-says-2025-09-01/
“Israel is committing genocide”
Go home, you racist fuckers. The debate’s over. You can’t call people liars, or antisemitic, or whatever, anymore.
You’ve been found out.
You’re complicit.
You can all officially go fuck yourselves.
And fuck the Zionist enablers among you.
It's Hamas who has the stated goal of destroying an entire civilization of people.https://www.reuters.com/world/middl...de-gaza-scholars-association-says-2025-09-01/
“Israel is committing genocide”
Go home, you racist fuckers. The debate’s over. You can’t call people liars, or antisemitic, or whatever, anymore.
You’ve been found out.
You’re complicit.
You can all officially go fuck yourselves.
And fuck the Zionist enablers among you.
https://www.reuters.com/world/middl...de-gaza-scholars-association-says-2025-09-01/
“Israel is committing genocide”
Go home, you racist fuckers. The debate’s over. You can’t call people liars, or antisemitic, or whatever, anymore.
You’ve been found out.
You’re complicit.
You can all officially go fuck yourselves.
And fuck the Zionist enablers among you.
The leadership refused to put the issue up to debate within the organization before the vote. and only about 130 members voted out of a total membership of 500. This isn't the slam-dunk you think it is.86% of the 500 scholars agreed with the statement put out
if that's the leadership 'pushing it through' then... whelp...
of course, there will always be someone/s willing to speak against it from the the 14% who didn't directly agree
do you have proof that they 'refused' to put it up for debate, as in they took a deliberately anti-position on debating, or was there no debate for other, normal, even procedural reasons? The woman who stated the leaders didn't do things the way they usually do, to bolster their own agendas, may be one of the few (potentially) who didn't agree with the resolution for their own reasons.The leadership refused to put the issue up to debate within the organization before the vote. and only about 130 members voted out of a total membership of 500. This isn't the slam-dunk you think it is.