I'm reading this OP and the whole point is that some people don't buy into the theory of global warming so they are offering a different perspective. Then they cherry pick information about people that, one would infer, shows them incapable of having honest, independent thoughts about the topic.
The science is not settled. To suggest that is the case is to demonstrate total ignorance of what science is.
God forbid that students are introduced to ideas in conflict with Al Gore's meal ticket.