circumcision...ugh

FrenziedMaiden said:
LMMFAO! I dare you to call child protective services and report it! I suspect that they could use the laugh, as well as I did.


that person is even dumber than krastner
 
hislove66 said:
That is exactly why it made sense 2000 years ago, but not anymore...


yes it does

the AMA even stated there is a higher risk of infection in the first year of life for uncircumcised babies
 
EarnestImp said:
Um, yeah, that's why circumcision was limited to a few small ethnic groups in the Middle East and Africa. The other places, like China, India, Europe, and the New World, must have had toilet paper, condoms, and penicillin for STDs. (any evidence for rampant STDs?)

That's essentially the problem with your thinking process. You replace rational analysis with colorful narrative and fantasy.


you are too stupid to continue talking to
 
this is absolutely fascinating.

a thread with a bevy of hysterical men with foreskin angst.

like someone asked earlier, where are the outraged cut men? it seems only the uncircumcised guys are in a tizzy.

the foreskin is analogous to the clitoral hood, not the clit itself, which is what's removed in female circumcision. comparing the two circumcisions is a red herring
 
TumbledLove said:
Thank you. That's a memorable comment. "significantly stupid" lol :D


you might want to write it down then

i can't even imagine that you could actually remember anything
 
TumbledLove said:
wow, your ignorance and lack of disregard (love) for your son, is appalling. Let me guess.. you're not gonna make him take baths, and make sure he brushes his teeth and cleans behind his ears either.

Foreskin is nearly 15 square inches. God put it there for a reason. and not to be hacked off by some dumbass parent.

sounds like they would make great lampshades.

my guy is uncut, and i can promise you i do not take 15 square inches of foreskin in my mouth most nights.

he's exceptionally clean, but most men are not like that, euro or american, contrary to the assertions otherwise.
 
Let's get crazy, and pretend that cirumcision would *guarentee* that boys would never get cancer and, barring any accidents, would live to be 100, and have no health problems EVER.

Even if this were true, is still does not justify permanently modifiying a baby's body without their permission.

Health reasons are irrelevant.

I wonder if in the future, parents will genetically alter their babies to not have foreskin.? here comes Gattaca?
 
TumbledLove said:
Let's get crazy, and pretend that cirumcision would *guarentee* that boys would never get cancer and, barring any accidents, would live to be 100, and have no health problems EVER.

Even if this were true, is still does not justify permanently modifiying a baby's body without their permission.

Health reasons are irrelevant.

I wonder if in the future, parents will genetically alter their babies to not have foreskin.? here comes Gattaca?

i permanently modified this baby's body by creating it

and i'm done talking to you as well

you and earnest are getting snipped

you can call it my decision to have the nasty skin removed, circumcision, or the ignore list, whichever suits you
 
thegirlfriday11 said:
i said a local anesthetic will be injected to numb the area around the penis
...a nerve block numbs a larger than necessary area
you are so fucking twisted it's not even funny

The APA and AMA note 3 methods for neonate circ:
EMLA (rather ineffective)
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block (DPNB) (effective)
Subcutaneous Ring Block (effective)

You said that a nerve block "isn't a good idea." Yet nerve block is a perfectly standard approach. The nerve block does exactly what you say - numbs the area around the penis.

Your take on infant prepuce care (clean under skin regularly in first year) would have bordered on malpractice had you given it as advice in a medical setting, given the strict prohibition against cleaning under the foreskin.
 
thegirlfriday11 said:
..i'm not going to be chasing down my 5-10 year old boy to make sure his dick is clean..

Quoted for truth. She is clearly a person that can't be bothered to take care of her son. She'll probably never bath him or brush his teeth either. I feel sorry for that kid.
 
Well, they say men are obsessed with their cocks. You've got all the rest of 'em beat. You're obsessed with a tiny piece of skin at the end of it.
 
Freya said:
Well, they say men are obsessed with their cocks. You've got all the rest of 'em beat. You're obsessed with a tiny piece of skin at the end of it.
thanks, your comments are always appreciated. *hug*
 
Last edited:
TumbledLove said:
Quoted for truth. She is clearly a person that can't be bothered to take care of her son. She'll probably never bath him or brush his teeth either. I feel sorry for that kid.


Future Fascist Cannon Fodder of America reporting for duty.
 
God put it there for a reason. and not to be hacked off by some dumbass parent.
Well, according to the Bible, you are exactly wrong there. It seems God did put it there pretty much so it could be hacked off.
 
Back
Top