Choosing the Right Leader for America's Future in November 2024.

[dmallord]

Who should we select for President now that we are less than ninety days away from voting? It's a crucial question requiring an honest appraisal of how each candidate will address the pressing issues: the economy, border security, and the cost of living, along with their broader vision for governance. They are not the nation’s only concern. There is a question of moral gravitas to address as well. This is the second time in our history that a convicted person has attempted to run for the Presidency. Kamal Harris and Donald Trump have a 50/50 chance of winning in most polls. So, I ask a secondary question: Is electing a convicted felon to run our nation of no major concern in this Presidential election for you?

 

[dkovic77]

For some people it’s okay for the Orange Jesus Convict in Chief to act they way he does since he will badly say the lines fed to him by his handlers that are designed for those who don’t think for themselves feel comfortable.

It’s their freedom to be stupid.

 

[dmallord]

There are stark comparisons between Harris and Trump on the economy issues. Harris is being criticized for government controls. Trump labels her a communist, hoping the tag will resonate with his base, but that seems not to sway the undecided he needs to win over. His platform is still ill-defined. Trump's offers provide no relief for present concerns. Instead, it focuses on a catchphrase: 'Drill baby, drill!' or the idea that foreign tariffs will solve our economic issues.

Kamala Harris' approach to Economic Solutions:

Harris’s economic plan focuses on stabilizing inflation, supporting job creation, and providing targeted relief for middle and lower-income families. Her approach aims to strengthen the economy through strategic investments and reforms that address immediate financial pressures on households.

Track Record of Support: Harris has been crafting policies supporting economic recovery and growth, aiming to provide a steady and informed path forward rather than relying on speculative promises.

Donald Trump's approach to Economic Solutions:

Trump’s doomsday rhetoric paints a picture of chaos and destruction under a Democratic administration, claiming that electing Democrats will lead to economic collapse. He has spent his campaign time attacking rather than defining his economic policies. While his statements may resonate with some, they lack specific, actionable plans to address the economy's real challenges. His focus on fear rather than solutions creates uncertainty and undermines confidence in economic stability.

 

[ll74]

Copy pasta king

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

The choice is between someone who was on his nefarious friend’s plane seven times or Kamala Harris.

 

[RobDownSouth]

...Trump's offers provide no relief for present concerns. Instead, it focuses on a catchphrase: 'Drill baby, drill!' or the idea that foreign tariffs will solve our economic issues.

That was one of the more "amusing but sad" moments in the Trump campaign: Jane Q Public asked Trump what he would do about inflation, he turned red, you could see the gears turning in his mental rolodex spinning wildly for an appropriate sound bite, his mouth making the involuntary "O" fishlips.

He stuttered, then decided on "Drill Baby Drill" and Jane looked mightily confused.

 

[ChloeTzang]

Mostly taken from Tom Kratman's "Lines of Departure" with a little addendum of my own

No, no; the choice is NOT between Trump and Harris.

The choice is between Trump and a closed oligarchy that does NOT have yours or anyone else's interests except their own in mind. In short, whatever you want to do, you _cannot_ vote Harris. Oh, yes, you can cast your vote beside her name, but she is not the front runner; she is a front, just as her putative boss, Joe Biden, was.

Go back to the year 2020, the year when, under cover of COVID, Joe Biden ran for the presidency from his basement. Why did he do that? Fear of COVID? That was the claim, of course, but the movers and shakers of the country, especially the democratic ones, did a very impressive job of demonstrating that COVID was just not that impressive. Sure, during the George Floyd riots, they might sic the police on people sitting on their front porches, shooting those same people with paintballs. But for themselves? Please; it was party city throughout the pandemic for anyone well connected enough. And for the rioters? They were pretty much hands off.

So much for COVID.

Flash forward to the Trump-Biden debate. There it became fairly obvious that the sitting president was…mostly not there anymore. I write this not with contempt but with a degree of sympathy; that fate awaits most of us, with time. More importantly, is there any reason to believe he was fully there when his handlers kept him locked in the basement during the 2020 campaign? There really isn’t. Moreover, the people who would swear that he was are the very same people who were telling us that he was sharp as a tack right up until the debate and for some time after; their word is worthless.

And then we have the pattern of conduct, the misguidance and mismanagement from the Afghanistan withdrawal debacle through the collapse of our southern border. It is not just hard, it is impossible, to identify a single thing that has gone well for the United States in between. Especially has the economy been a disaster, and not one that the smoke and mirrors of the Democratic Party and their lapdogs of the press has been very successful in hiding. That pattern is consistent and consistently horrifying. That pattern says very strongly that the Joe Biden of the debate was the same man who stayed in his basement in 2020.

He's been this way all along.

Then, too, we have the palace coup that drove Biden from the 2024 race. Obviously, he did not decide that for himself, either.

Even so, even if Biden was incapable of doing much of anything on his own, or was not allowed to, decisions still were being made, to include decisions to do nothing, to include the decision to force him from the campaign. Who was making those decisions?

We don’t really know. Obama is a likely member of the junta – and, yes, clearly, it is a junta – as are the Clintons, both the rapist and Felonia von Pantsuit. I would suggest that the thirty-five or so members of the House and the five senators who publicly called on Biden to step aside are not members of the junta, but that those who likely gave them their marching orders, Schumer and Pelosi – who is never out of office even when out of office, are. Hakim Jeffries may well be. Garland probably is a member. Kagan may represent the left wing of the Supreme Court. Perhaps there are a few others.

Speaking of Kagan and the legal system, do but note that the supporters of the junta are the same people who will talk about the rule of law even as they prostitute the law to wage lawfare against anyone – Trump and the J6 protesters, principally – who tries to supersede them and return the country to an actual republic.

It is, by the way, unclear and I think rather unlikely that Kamala Harris is a member of that junta, any more than Joe Biden was. This, quite despite her holding views that are not easily distinguished from, say, Marx or Engles….or Lenin…or Mao…or perhaps – we cannot say for sure and when we are sure it will also be too late – Pol Pot or Stalin.

Soros? No, I don’t think so. He’s pretty distasteful from all perspectives. Now does the junta consult with him? Regularly, I am sure.

But the names don’t matter and will probably never be known for certain. The only name we’ll be allowed to see is that of Kamala Harris, the frontwoman for the junta that has been telling Joe Biden what to do for more than four years. And which will be telling Kamala Harris what to do for another four to eight, if they’re allowed to.

Just think of it, Franklin Delano Roosevelt had a bit over three terms; Obama and the junta may have as many as five. Hell, they may have an infinite number, if they succeed in destroying the Republic.

“Bu’, bu’, bu’, muh democracy!”

I have some bad news for you, the people moaning about the loss of democracy are the same people who decided to simply install as their nominee a woman who is thoroughly disliked, even within their party, whose previous run for the nomination was a disaster, who has had, in other words, not a single vote cast for her this year, and a paltry few in 2020. In short, let me suggest to you a more modern, more accurate definition of democracy in 21st century America:

Democracy, n. The unlimited and uninterrupted rule of the junta that looks after the interests of the vile and already filthy rich kleptocrats, corrupt bureaucrats, quasi-literate journalists, drooling pedophiles, academic lunatics, soulless and stupid entertainers, and other assorted human garbage on the inside of the Democratic Party.

If that’s the definition of “democracy,” and it now is, and that is what you want, wouldn’t you be happier in, say, China or perhaps North Korea?

But to finish with the same point we started with, which should be much clearer now, it is impossible to actually vote for Harris. The most you can do is vote for a junta, and, indeed, a junta that bears close resemblance to the Politburo that ran the Soviet Union or the one that is now running China, an oligarchy the members of which loathe actual democracy and don’t really hide that they do.

So for most of you, it would be wise to vote for Trump, regardless of your current views, because you really are more than likely voting for your lives (remember Stalin and Mao - most of those sent off to the gulags and executed were the gullible faithful - that's most of you here), if not immediately in the future, then a little further out, because if Harris DOES win this election by the fraud that the Democrats are so obviously preparing to perpetrate, then there will never be another free and fair election in the USA. Instead, we will likely devolved into an eventual civil conflict and this Rome too will die, because if there is obvious electoral fraud this time, a lot of people WILL go extreme.

Something to think about.

 

[YDB95]

The choice is between Trump and a closed oligarchy that does NOT have yours or anyone else's interests except their own in mind.

Anyone who thinks Trump has anyone's interests but his own in mind needs their head examined.

 

[ChloeTzang]

Anyone who thinks Trump has anyone's interests but his own in mind needs their head examined.

Take your pick. Personally, I think it's a pretty obvious choice and anyone who votes for "Harris" needs their head read.

 

[ll74]

Take your pick. Personally, I think it's a pretty obvious choice and anyone who votes for "Harris" needs their head read.

Yes, you vote for Trump over country.

 

[RoryN]

I'm not going to spoon feed it to you how that would be implemented.

When no one responds to this, his follow up will be, "Okay, so here's how it would work..."

 

[ChloeTzang]

Yes, you vote for Trump over country.

Actually, more the other way around. I'd personally rather have seen DeSantis as candidate, but Trump will do.

 

[ll74]

Actually, more the other way around. I'd personally rather have seen DeSantis as candidate, but Trump will do.

Yes, I get that you see it that way

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Mostly taken from Tom Kratman's "Lines of Departure" with a little addendum of my own

No, no; the choice is NOT between Trump and Harris.

The choice is between Trump and a closed oligarchy that does NOT have yours or anyone else's interests except their own in mind. In short, whatever you want to do, you _cannot_ vote Harris. Oh, yes, you can cast your vote beside her name, but she is not the front runner; she is a front, just as her putative boss, Joe Biden, was.

Go back to the year 2020, the year when, under cover of COVID, Joe Biden ran for the presidency from his basement. Why did he do that? Fear of COVID? That was the claim, of course, but the movers and shakers of the country, especially the democratic ones, did a very impressive job of demonstrating that COVID was just not that impressive. Sure, during the George Floyd riots, they might sic the police on people sitting on their front porches, shooting those same people with paintballs. But for themselves? Please; it was party city throughout the pandemic for anyone well connected enough. And for the rioters? They were pretty much hands off.

So much for COVID.

Flash forward to the Trump-Biden debate. There it became fairly obvious that the sitting president was…mostly not there anymore. I write this not with contempt but with a degree of sympathy; that fate awaits most of us, with time. More importantly, is there any reason to believe he was fully there when his handlers kept him locked in the basement during the 2020 campaign? There really isn’t. Moreover, the people who would swear that he was are the very same people who were telling us that he was sharp as a tack right up until the debate and for some time after; their word is worthless.

And then we have the pattern of conduct, the misguidance and mismanagement from the Afghanistan withdrawal debacle through the collapse of our southern border. It is not just hard, it is impossible, to identify a single thing that has gone well for the United States in between. Especially has the economy been a disaster, and not one that the smoke and mirrors of the Democratic Party and their lapdogs of the press has been very successful in hiding. That pattern is consistent and consistently horrifying. That pattern says very strongly that the Joe Biden of the debate was the same man who stayed in his basement in 2020.

He's been this way all along.

Then, too, we have the palace coup that drove Biden from the 2024 race. Obviously, he did not decide that for himself, either.

Even so, even if Biden was incapable of doing much of anything on his own, or was not allowed to, decisions still were being made, to include decisions to do nothing, to include the decision to force him from the campaign. Who was making those decisions?

We don’t really know. Obama is a likely member of the junta – and, yes, clearly, it is a junta – as are the Clintons, both the rapist and Felonia von Pantsuit. I would suggest that the thirty-five or so members of the House and the five senators who publicly called on Biden to step aside are not members of the junta, but that those who likely gave them their marching orders, Schumer and Pelosi – who is never out of office even when out of office, are. Hakim Jeffries may well be. Garland probably is a member. Kagan may represent the left wing of the Supreme Court. Perhaps there are a few others.

Speaking of Kagan and the legal system, do but note that the supporters of the junta are the same people who will talk about the rule of law even as they prostitute the law to wage lawfare against anyone – Trump and the J6 protesters, principally – who tries to supersede them and return the country to an actual republic.

It is, by the way, unclear and I think rather unlikely that Kamala Harris is a member of that junta, any more than Joe Biden was. This, quite despite her holding views that are not easily distinguished from, say, Marx or Engles….or Lenin…or Mao…or perhaps – we cannot say for sure and when we are sure it will also be too late – Pol Pot or Stalin.

Soros? No, I don’t think so. He’s pretty distasteful from all perspectives. Now does the junta consult with him? Regularly, I am sure.

But the names don’t matter and will probably never be known for certain. The only name we’ll be allowed to see is that of Kamala Harris, the frontwoman for the junta that has been telling Joe Biden what to do for more than four years. And which will be telling Kamala Harris what to do for another four to eight, if they’re allowed to.

Just think of it, Franklin Delano Roosevelt had a bit over three terms; Obama and the junta may have as many as five. Hell, they may have an infinite number, if they succeed in destroying the Republic.

“Bu’, bu’, bu’, muh democracy!”

I have some bad news for you, the people moaning about the loss of democracy are the same people who decided to simply install as their nominee a woman who is thoroughly disliked, even within their party, whose previous run for the nomination was a disaster, who has had, in other words, not a single vote cast for her this year, and a paltry few in 2020. In short, let me suggest to you a more modern, more accurate definition of democracy in 21st century America:

Democracy, n. The unlimited and uninterrupted rule of the junta that looks after the interests of the vile and already filthy rich kleptocrats, corrupt bureaucrats, quasi-literate journalists, drooling pedophiles, academic lunatics, soulless and stupid entertainers, and other assorted human garbage on the inside of the Democratic Party.

If that’s the definition of “democracy,” and it now is, and that is what you want, wouldn’t you be happier in, say, China or perhaps North Korea?

But to finish with the same point we started with, which should be much clearer now, it is impossible to actually vote for Harris. The most you can do is vote for a junta, and, indeed, a junta that bears close resemblance to the Politburo that ran the Soviet Union or the one that is now running China, an oligarchy the members of which loathe actual democracy and don’t really hide that they do.

So for most of you, it would be wise to vote for Trump, regardless of your current views, because you really are more than likely voting for your lives (remember Stalin and Mao - most of those sent off to the gulags and executed were the gullible faithful - that's most of you here), if not immediately in the future, then a little further out, because if Harris DOES win this election by the fraud that the Democrats are so obviously preparing to perpetrate, then there will never be another free and fair election in the USA. Instead, we will likely devolved into an eventual civil conflict and this Rome too will die, because if there is obvious electoral fraud this time, a lot of people WILL go extreme.

Something to think about.

So in summation you’re going to vote for the guy who was on his nefarious friend’s plane seven times.

 

[ChloeTzang]

So in summation you’re going to vote for the guy who was on his nefarious friend’s plane seven times.

Yeah yeah yeah. You do realize that if there was anything at all they could get him on for that, they'd have been allover him like flies over Kamala's ass after Willy Brown was done.

 

[Boat1]

Who should we select for President now that we are less than ninety days away from voting? It's a crucial question requiring an honest appraisal of how each candidate will address the pressing issues: the economy, border security, and the cost of living, along with their broader vision for governance. They are not the nation’s only concern. There is a question of moral gravitas to address as well. This is the second time in our history that a convicted person has attempted to run for the Presidency. Kamal Harris and Donald Trump have a 50/50 chance of winning in most polls. So, I ask a secondary question: Is electing a convicted felon to run our nation of no major concern in this Presidential election for you?

In a country that has as many obscure "laws" as we do, someone being a "convicted felon" means absolutely nothing to me.
Most Americans break numerous "laws" every single day (most, unknowingly) because we have too many "laws!"
IMHO, Ron Paul was the best candidate I've seen in my lifetime, simply because he was a Constitutionalist.

 

[RoryN]

"convicted felon" means absolutely nothing to me.

Oh! Well, here you go:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conviction

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/felon

 

[Boat1]

Oh! Well, here you go:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conviction

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/felon

If it doesn't break my leg, or pick my pocket, no crime was committed against me.
Stop imprisoning people for victimless crimes, period.
Study "Jury Nullification."

 

[Boat1]

Okay - we'll put you down for an order of being censored and getting raped. Want fries with that?

Now you're into rape fantasies too... Shocked I tell ya! LMAO

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

This fact regarding how many laws are on the books is not publicized enough.
Fortunately, there is a fail safe, known as Jury Nullification.
When "public" schools are abolished, private ones can teach kids HOW to think rather than WHAT to think, and their rights and duties as citizens will once again be an integral part of integration.

What happens to children whose parents are too poor to send them to private school?

 

[Boat1]

Okay - we'll put you down for an order of being censored, getting raped, and having one of your loved one's legs broken and pocket picked.

Want fries with that?

...and that, would be a huge mistake to make.

 

[RoryN]

...and that, would be a huge mistake to make.

Why? You won't do anything about it - you're obviously chickenshit.

 

[Boat1]

Why? You won't do anything about it - you're obviously chickenshit.

You obviously don't know me.

If I remember correctly, you recently had a thread about "reporting posts" about threatening violence, etc...

Tonight, you've put me on a "list" to be raped and one to have a loved one's leg broken and robbed...

What's wrong, were you not hugged enough as a child?

 

[RoryN]

If I remember correctly, you recently had a thread about "reporting posts" about threatening violence, etc...

Tonight, you've put me on a "list" to be raped

Now you're into rape fantasies too...

Aww - looks like you played yourself out of a complaint.

Poor dummy. Oopsies.

 

[Boat1]

Aww - looks like you played yourself out of a complaint.

Poor dummy. Oopsies.

I don't file complaints. Sorry to disappoint you again.
BTW, how much does Langley pay you per post, to try to elicit online threats, $0.03?