China thread.

[Chobham]

Let's start with this.

China Update.

The presenter is one of the most balanced observers that I've run across. He covers the pro's and con's without personal interjections. So what are the take a ways from the above?

China is floundering. Particularly with the latest sanctions re. integrated circuits. Their previous efforts resulted in massive shell games and corruption so there is no reason to believe that this recently announced effort won't result in the same. Our own government is just as guilty. Virtually all of the really great advances did not come about as a result of government subsidies.

China is still NOT a consumer economy, even the report cited doesn't take that into consideration. They are a factory, they import raw material, process it, then export goods. Mostly cheap goods. They are even more subject to supply chains than the rest of us, particularly with regard to the import side.

I'm having a real *chuckle* over the notion that China thought it could stick it's nose into Afghanistan after the embarrassing exit of the US. You go Xi.

 

[JohnEngelman]

I love China, Chinese culture, and the Chinese people. I do not like the Communist Chinese dictatorship. The success of democracy in Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan convinces me that democracy would work well on the mainland, and in North Korea.

Beginning with the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty in China whites of European ancestry and Orientals have created the most advanced civilizations. We deserve to be called "the two civilized races." Orientals in the United States deserve to be called "the model minority." Diversity is not our strength. It is a source of social discord, and the main reason for the polarization that makes it difficult for the U.S. government to solve problems that would have been manageable before 1964.

 

[jaF0]

The tube is not a news source BB.

 

[JohnEBbad]

The tube is not a news source BB.

If you only have stupid to offer in a conversation, maybe you should just stay ...

 

[ll74]

I love China, Chinese culture, and the Chinese people. I do not like the Communist Chinese dictatorship. The success of democracy in Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan convinces me that democracy would work well on the mainland, and in North Korea.

Beginning with the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty in China whites of European ancestry and Orientals have created the most advanced civilizations. We deserve to be called "the two civilized races." Orientals in the United States deserve to be called "the model minority." Diversity is not our strength. It is a source of social discord, and the main reason for the polarization that makes it difficult for the U.S. government to solve problems that would have been manageable before 1964.

The post is about the economy and you still can't talk about anything but your hard-on for Asians.

You seriously have racisn issues.

 

[schism666]

I love China, Chinese culture, and the Chinese people. I do not like the Communist Chinese dictatorship. The success of democracy in Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan convinces me that democracy would work well on the mainland, and in North Korea.

Beginning with the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty in China whites of European ancestry and Orientals have created the most advanced civilizations. We deserve to be called "the two civilized races." Orientals in the United States deserve to be called "the model minority." Diversity is not our strength. It is a source of social discord, and the main reason for the polarization that makes it difficult for the U.S. government to solve problems that would have been manageable before 1964.

funny that you didn't find this post stupid. ^

If you only have stupid to offer in a conversation, maybe you should just stay ...

not so much funny as not surprising.

 

[JohnEngelman]

The post is about the economy and you still can't talk about anything but your hard-on for Asians.

You seriously have racisn issues.

Your issues consist of your inability to accept arguments you do not like, even though you cannot refute them.

It is ironic that the Nazi effort to exterminate the most superior race in existence led to the dogma that there are no inferior races.

What you call my racism consists of my willingness to draw attention to low black IQ averages and high rates of black crime and illegitimacy. These are legitimate problems that have legitimate political implications.

 

[ll74]

Your issues consist of your inability to accept arguments you do not like, even though you cannot refute them.

It is ironic that the Nazi effort to exterminate the most superior race in existence led to the dogma that there are no inferior races.

What you call my racism consists of my willingness to draw attention to low black IQ averages and high rates of black crime and illegitimacy. These are legitimate problems that have legitimate political implications.

What I call your racism is your racism.

Believing a race is superior to another.

 

[JohnEngelman]

What I call your racism is your racism.

Believing a race is superior to another.

We have been through this many times before. I tire of trying to push facts into your closed and narrow mind.

I have never said that all Orientals are superior to all blacks. that begs the question of what we mean by superior. Blacks look good on the basket ball court and the dance floor. They tend to be less impressive in the class room. Those are facts, ll74, hard, cold facts.

It is obvious to anyone willing to look that the different races differ in average qualities necessary to create thriving societies and civilizations. Compare Oriental countries with sub Saharan countries to see what these differences lead to.

By your definition anyone who tells the truth about average racial differences that have always been obvious is a racist.

It was only the revelations of the Holocaust and the civil rights movement that made it fashionable to lie about average racial differences, and often dangerous to express truths that virtually everyone is privately aware of.

Bertrand Russel was a democratic socialist who won the Nobel Prize in literature. This is what he wrote in Marriage and Morals, which was published in 1929:

"In extreme cases, there can be little doubt of the superiority of one race to another. North America, Australia, and New Zealand certainly contribute more to the civilization of the world than they would do if they were still peopled by aborigines. It seems on the whole fair to regard negroes as on the average inferior to white men, although for work in the tropics they are indispensable, so that their extermination (apart from questions of humanity) would be highly undesirable.

"But when it comes to discriminating among the races of Europe, a mass of bad science has to be brought in to support political prejudice. Nor do I see any valid ground for regarding the yellow races as in any degree inferior to our noble selves."

After the Second World War Russell retracted that statement, but no scientific evidence has come forward to discredit it. What scientific evidence has leaked through the restrictions of political correctness verifies Russell's original statement.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

We have been through this many times before. I tire of trying to push facts into your closed and narrow mind.

Good then shut the fuck up about it.......it's a constant whine from you. You don't care about peer reviewed facts, only your "fact".

As I said earlier fuck off and die!

 

[ll74]

We have been through this many times before. I tire of trying to push facts into your closed and narrow mind.

I have never said that all Orientals are superior to all blacks. that begs the question of what we mean by superior. Blacks look good on the basket ball court and the dance floor. They tend to be less impressive in the class room. Those are facts, ll74, hard, cold facts.

It is obvious to anyone willing to look that the different races differ in average qualities necessary to create thriving societies and civilizations. Compare Oriental countries with sub Saharan countries to see what these differences lead to.

By your definition anyone who tells the truth about average racial differences that have always been obvious is a racist.

It was only the revelations of the Holocaust and the civil rights movement that made it fashionable to lie about average racial differences, and often dangerous to express truths that virtually everyone is privately aware of.

Bertrand Russel was a democratic socialist who won the Nobel Prize in literature. This is what he wrote in Marriage and Morals, which was published in 1929:

"In extreme cases, there can be little doubt of the superiority of one race to another. North America, Australia, and New Zealand certainly contribute more to the civilization of the world than they would do if they were still peopled by aborigines. It seems on the whole fair to regard negroes as on the average inferior to white men, although for work in the tropics they are indispensable, so that their extermination (apart from questions of humanity) would be highly undesirable.

"But when it comes to discriminating among the races of Europe, a mass of bad science has to be brought in to support political prejudice. Nor do I see any valid ground for regarding the yellow races as in any degree inferior to our noble selves."

After the Second World War Russell retracted that statement, but no scientific evidence has come forward to discredit it. What scientific evidence has leaked through the restrictions of political correctness verifies Russell's original statement.

Yes, you continue to state that your racism isn't racism.

You believe certain races are superior to others. If you believe that definition includes people you agree with, it's because you agree with other racists.

And the you tell me multiple times that you're ok with being a racist......if so, why do you always need to explain your racism?

 

[icanhelp1]

Good then shut the fuck up about it.......it's a constant whine from you. You don't care about peer reviewed facts, only your "fact".

As I said earlier fuck off and die!

What time do you start drinking in the morning, just curious? You should perhaps check into a detox center.

Definitely suffer from anger management issues.

 

[JohnEngelman]

Good then shut the fuck up about it.......it's a constant whine from you. You don't care about peer reviewed facts, only your "fact".

As I said earlier fuck off and die!

You should have noticed by now that your death threats do not intimidate me. They demonstrate that you have nothing to contribute to what should be a calm, and rational discussion.

 

[JohnEngelman]

Yes, you continue to state that your racism isn't racism.

You believe certain races are superior to others. If you believe that definition includes people you agree with, it's because you agree with other racists.

And the you tell me multiple times that you're ok with being a racist......if so, why do you always need to explain your racism?

By your definition I am a racist. Watch me not care.

 

[ll74]

By your definition I am a racist. Watch me not care.

Which is why you whine about being called one every time.

By the definition of racist, you are a racist.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/racist

 

[JohnEngelman]

What time do you start drinking in the morning, just curious? You should perhaps check into a detox center.

Definitely suffer from anger management issues.

Fuzzy1975 resembles this pathetic human being:

 

[icanhelp1]

You should have noticed by now that your death threats do not intimidate me. They demonstrate that you have nothing to contribute to what should be a calm, and rational discussion.

Ya have to cut FYZZYNUTS some slack, the only creature that lunatic Canuck has in his life is his pet moose Bullwinkle.

Which I might add is intellectually superior.

 

[JohnEngelman]

Which is why you whine about being called one every time.

By the definition of racist, you are a racist.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/racist

racist​

1 of 2

adjective​

rac·ist ˈrā-sist
also -shist

: of, relating to, or characterized by racism: such as
a
: having, reflecting, or fostering the belief that race (see RACE entry 1 sense 1a) is a fundamental determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/racist

​

I do not believe that racial differences cause differences in average intelligence, and in rates of crime and illegitimacy. I believe on the basis of all the relevant evidence that racial differences correlate with differences in average ability levels and behavior.

So, I do believe that average "racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race." However, I do not believe that I belong to that particular race. I believe that Ashkenazi Jews, with their average IQ's of 115, do. Jews make up 0.2% of the human population. They have won one fifth of the Nobel Prizes. I am a white Gentile of European ancestry. We tip the scales with an IQ average of 100. Orientals come in with 106. They also have lower rates of crime and illegitimacy than we do.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Ya have to cut FYZZYNUTS some slack, the only creature that lunatic Canuck has in his life is his pet moose Bullwinkle.

Which I might add is intellectually superior.

You should ring his neck.

 

[JohnEngelman]

Ya have to cut FYZZYNUTS some slack, the only creature that lunatic Canuck has in his life is his pet moose Bullwinkle.

Which I might add is intellectually superior.

Fuzzy1975 is a pathetic little man who thinks he becomes impressive behind his key board and computer screen.

 

[icanhelp1]

Fuzzy1975 is a pathetic little man who thinks he becomes impressive behind his key board and computer screen.

Well, there’s no doubt he is the bravest of keyboard warriors, a legend in his own mind. Fuzzy and Laz are the Batman and Robin of the internet world. Well, anyway, back to China

 

[ll74]

racist​

1 of 2

adjective​

rac·ist ˈrā-sist
also -shist

: of, relating to, or characterized by racism: such as
a
: having, reflecting, or fostering the belief that race (see RACE entry 1 sense 1a) is a fundamental determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race

​

I do not believe that racial differences cause differences in average intelligence, and in rates of crime and illegitimacy. I believe on the basis of all the relevant evidence that racial differences correlate with differences in average ability levels and behavior.

So, I do believe that average "racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race." However, I do not believe that I belong to that particular race. I believe that Ashkenazi Jews, with their average IQ's of 115, do. Jews make up 0.2% of the human population. They have won one fifth of the Nobel Prizes. I am a white Gentile of European ancestry. We tip the scales with an IQ average of 100. Orientals come in with 106. They also have lower rates of crime and illegitimacy than we do.

Yes you do. That's what you argue. Every single time.Stop lying to yourself and to others.

 

[ffish1]

speaking of the Chinese
did people watch "American Factory" on Netflix?

Holly shit some really crazy stuff in there
that would be spine chilling, had the producers not used such great humor

 

[JohnEngelman]

Yes you do. That's what you argue. Every single time.Stop lying to yourself and to others.

I have lied to no one. If I am a racist, than racism is true.

 

[ll74]

I have lied to no one. If I am a racist, than racism is true.

Yes, you believe racism is true. You're finally getting it.