China, a dictatorship a dozen times worse than Nazi Germany

LovingTongue said:
I refuse to be personable to someone who's literally lying under the burning wreckage of their own arguments while refusing to admit they're wrong.

LT, according to you everyone's wrong. Except you of course.

You invite the derision you recieve.

Ishmael
 
Ishmael said:
LT, according to you everyone's wrong. Except you of course.

You invite the derision you recieve.

Ishmael
But I've never failed to back up my assertions with documented fact.

Very few people challenge me on facts - they see they're outclassed and switch over to namecalling. Unfortunately that backfires, too.

Morwen clearly sees she was wrong in interpreting my original post, but like 99% of GBers on here, she can't admit it.

Not even you can deny with a straight face that she was wrong.

But now the discussion is being steered away from her being wrong, to how personable and charming I am.

Redirect, redirect, redirect. It's the coward's lightsaber.
 
Ishmael said:
No, I don't. :) Do you? Are you capable of speaking plainly?
I was referring to Taiwan.

As far as 'cannon fodder' is concerned, you're right. But were LT? Hmmmmm???

They can't transport 1 million to Taiwan. Not today, not into the foreseeable future. They can't project power. It's simple. They're a continental Army and a coastal Navy. One Sea Wolf class can sink all of their heavy sea lift capabililty craft without reloading. And that's today.

I'm not all that concerned about China's military power. And for all the hooplah, China has decided to compete economically. They'll do well for a while, and then the natives will get restless.

Ishmael
You actually have a point about the lack of sealift power. That was well said.

But how will the natives prevail? Those millions of hopelessly single males could be used to turn on other restless male natives if they can't actually get to Taiwan. Kill the opposing men in the ultimate act of tribalism and snatch the women bystanders while they're at it.

You owe me a beer when it happens and everyone is left standing around scratching their heads saying "we never saw that coming". :)
 
LovingTongue said:
But I've never failed to back up my assertions with documented fact.

Very few people challenge me on facts - they see they're outclassed and switch over to namecalling. Unfortunately that backfires, too.

Morwen clearly sees she was wrong in interpreting my original post, but like 99% of GBers on here, she can't admit it.

Not even you can deny with a straight face that she was wrong.

But now the discussion is being steered away from her being wrong, to how personable and charming I am.

Redirect, redirect, redirect. It's the coward's lightsaber.


LT you've backed up your assertions with facts that fit your hypothesis. Those aren't immutable facts or laws of nature, just evidence to support your position. Further, most of those 'facts' are imbedded in opinion pieces.

Read back LT. Who's the one that started down this road? Not in this thread, but in many others?

And Morwen can make some good points. Even if she doesn't know what the fuck she's talking about concerning oil. *chuckle*

Ishmael
 
Ishmael said:
LT you've backed up your assertions with facts that fit your hypothesis. Those aren't immutable facts or laws of nature, just evidence to support your position. Further, most of those 'facts' are imbedded in opinion pieces.

Read back LT. Who's the one that started down this road? Not in this thread, but in many others?
Judging by what you just accused me of, the better question is, who hasn't?

You discount even my Government statistics posts as opinion pieces.

And Morwen can make some good points. Even if she doesn't know what the fuck she's talking about concerning oil. *chuckle*

Ishmael
Let's get back to the topic here. Who in the world would be dumb enough to read what I posted and interpret from it "China building a jetfighter makes China worse than Nazi Germany"?

Morwen is praying that its little mistake will inevitably go away quietly and not stick like Cade Is Here's "Pussy Power" thread. :D
 
LovingTongue said:
I was referring to Taiwan.


You actually have a point about the lack of sealift power. That was well said.

But how will the natives prevail? Those millions of hopelessly single males could be used to turn on other restless male natives if they can't actually get to Taiwan. Kill the opposing men in the ultimate act of tribalism and snatch the women bystanders while they're at it.

You owe me a beer when it happens and everyone is left standing around scratching their heads saying "we never saw that coming". :)

Yes I do have a point LT. I've only been posting it for two years now.

Who cares how they prevail? Really? China is a modern and sophisticated country, surely they're planning on cleaning up the mess they've made. Their internet censorship is backfiring on them as faster than they can throw the "Progressives" in jail. (If that isn't a hoot, what is? Conservatives being called 'Progressives." Ya gotta love it.)

Contain and enmesh in the world of business. Afterall, the Chinese want their children to have PS3's too.

Ishmael
 
LovingTongue said:
Let's get back to the topic here. Who in the world would be dumb enough to read what I posted and interpret from it "China building a jetfighter makes China worse than Nazi Germany"?

Morwen is praying that its little mistake will inevitably go away quietly and not stick like Cade Is Here's "Pussy Power" thread. :D

Dumb or just read the thread title?

Ishmael
 
LovingTongue said:
Morwen is praying that its little mistake will inevitably go away quietly and not stick like Cade Is Here's "Pussy Power" thread. :D

You're nutty, you know?
 
LovingTongue said:
You'll fuck anything with tits and a pulse, won't you?
She's quick-witted and funny. Which puts her above 95% of Lit women.

Ishmael said:
LT, according to you everyone's wrong. Except you of course.

You invite the derision you recieve.

[...]

LT you've backed up your assertions with facts that fit your hypothesis. Those aren't immutable facts or laws of nature, just evidence to support your position. Further, most of those 'facts' are imbedded in opinion pieces.
All very true statements.
 
I stopped reading as soon as the article said the Jian-10 is "swept-wing". BWAHAHAH!!!

That's even dumber than the title.
 
LovingTongue said:
Now what kind of shit brained poster would read "fighter planes are why China is worse than Nazi Germany" into what I said? :rolleyes:

.

Because ... that's what you said?
 
MechaBlade said:
She's quick-witted and funny. Which puts her above 95% of Lit women.
You're like all defending me and shit.
 
Ishmael said:
Dumb or just read the thread title?

Ishmael
"China, a dictatorship a dozen times worse than Nazi Germany" now has home grown high tech fighters.

How does anyone interpret that to mean "they're worse than Nazi Germany because they have high tech fighters?
 
Mark it down- I agree with LT on something.

China is our enemy, the sooner people figure this out, the better.
 
Stuponfucious said:
I stopped reading as soon as the article said the Jian-10 is "swept-wing". BWAHAHAH!!!

That's even dumber than the title.
a) Mao killed 50 million of his own people - possibly as much as 10 times many Jews killed by Hitler.

b) China has nukes. Germany never got that far.

c) China's people have gone to great lengths to weed out baby girls in favor of baby boys. As many as 200 million by some estimates.

d) China harvests its prisoners for involuntary organ donations.


The title was not dumb - it was a statement of fact.

Measuring by the number of people murdered outright, China has gone far beyond Nazi Germany. Its production of its own fighter jets makes it in addition a bigger air power threat in the region. Which is why other nations are already highly concerned about it.
 
Slider69 said:
Mark it down- I agree with LT on something.

China is our enemy, the sooner people figure this out, the better.
It doesn't make sense for us to let them own our currency like this. Those guys even said they'd give capitalism the rope to hang itself.
 
LovingTongue said:
a) Mao killed 50 million of his own people - possibly as much as 10 times many Jews killed by Hitler.

b) China has nukes. Germany never got that far.

c) China's people have gone to great lengths to weed out baby girls in favor of baby boys. As many as 200 million by some estimates.

d) China harvests its prisoners for involuntary organ donations.


The title was not dumb - it was a statement of fact.

Measuring by the number of people murdered outright, China has gone far beyond Nazi Germany. Its production of its own fighter jets makes it in addition a bigger air power threat in the region. Which is why other nations are already highly concerned about it.

Add to that the fact that China has been going about the largest military buildup in the history of humankind and it's been summarily ignored by seemingly the world.

They've been aided and abetted by American politicians and defense and technology companies whose backroom deals, criminal behavior, and selling of national security secrets should have resulted in hangings by now but have also been swept under the carpet.

We are economically vulnerable because of the massive trade imbalance, the result of our whoring ourselves out for cheap imported goods, worshiping at the altar of the trade gods. China is sitting on ONE TRILLION in US currency and could plunge us into a recession at best, depression at worst, if they decide to blink. They've artificially manipulated the yuan by not letting it float, which has also helped their goals.

China is ultimately still a Communist country--when you cut through the patina of Western capitalism--the ultimate red herring--they are clearly a threat.
 
Slider69 said:
Add to that the fact that China has been going about the largest military buildup in the history of humankind and it's been summarily ignored by seemingly the world.

They've been aided and abetted by American politicians and defense and technology companies whose backroom deals, criminal behavior, and selling of national security secrets should have resulted in hangings by now but have also been swept under the carpet.

We are economically vulnerable because of the massive trade imbalance, the result of our whoring ourselves out for cheap imported goods, worshiping at the altar of the trade gods. China is sitting on ONE TRILLION in US currency and could plunge us into a recession at best, depression at worst, if they decide to blink. They've artificially manipulated the yuan by not letting it float, which has also helped their goals.

China is ultimately still a Communist country--when you cut through the patina of Western capitalism--the ultimate red herring--they are clearly a threat.
My primary reason for hating Clinton wasn't his blowjobs - it was more about stuff like how nuclear secrets got to China under his watch. But then what wasn't so publicly known was all the industrial technology that corporations were giving them freely, over the counter.

China could sell off our dollar, ruin us as a market for their goods, and continue producing for themselves and shut out the West. Most free trade defenders don't see that.
 
LovingTongue said:
My primary reason for hating Clinton wasn't his blowjobs - it was more about stuff like how nuclear secrets got to China under his watch. But then what wasn't so publicly known was all the industrial technology that corporations were giving them freely, over the counter.

China could sell off our dollar, ruin us as a market for their goods, and continue producing for themselves and shut out the West. Most free trade defenders don't see that.

Agreed....and the same companies--like Hughes, for example--who are key US defense contractors, are also conveying top technology secrets to what is a hostile regime.

Love him or hate him, Pat Buchanan has been the vanguard about this--warning people for years about the dangers of not only China, but of the cult of free trade.
 
Slider69 said:
Agreed....and the same companies--like Hughes, for example--who are key US defense contractors, are also conveying top technology secrets to what is a hostile regime.

Love him or hate him, Pat Buchanan has been the vanguard about this--warning people for years about the dangers of not only China, but of the cult of free trade.
It is indeed a cult, based on faiths and dogma which have proven to be untrue.

You ought to see the "If LovingTongue were President" thread by Ebony_Queen... if I were running things I would knock down trade barriers with Europe and other democratic nations and totally cut off China.
 
Back
Top