Charlie Kirk was killed by a military-style ASSAULT WEAPON.

Really sad, RubOneOut, to celebrate the death of a young man who doesn't think like you! And you wonder why your ideals are so fucking unpopular.
Didn't know the guy. Not celebrating in the least. Supremely indifferent, to be honest.

I am amused at the amount of performative garment-rendering being done by the Usual Suspects here, though.
 
Didn't know the guy. Not celebrating in the least. Supremely indifferent, to be honest.

I am amused at the amount of performative garment-rendering being done by the Usual Suspects here, though.

How do ammosexual MAGAts mourn???

Do they cut lines into their steel penis substitutes???

🤔
 
The furthest target on the M-16 qualification range is 300 meters. I plunked both of them when they popped up. That is 328 yards. But I could also zero three rounds in one hole. That was the beauty of the M-16. Very accurate and repeatable.
I'd like to see that target. At 100 yards you'd have to have sub-MOA accuracy to achieve a single hole. The accuracy required would be 0.15–0.20 MOA, which no standard issue M-16 is capable of. With the M-16 you'd be better off with a 36-yard zero which produces a much shorter line of impacts over a 300-yard distance, 3 to 4 inches as opposed to 6-8+ inches with a 100-yard zero. And at 36 yards you may get a little closer to achieving a single hole (.223inch) initially, though I still doubt it. You might be able to do that with a good varmint rifle but the M-16 is doubtful.:)
 
The AR-15 should be put into the same category as nuclear, chemical, biological, and radiological weapons.
 
If a 90-year old bolt-action surplus beater too old to even have a serial number is an "assault weapon" then I'm Stephen Hawking. Ya think there's a reason Uncle Sam doesn't deploy us to Iraq or Afghanistan with 1930 bolt-action Mausers?
Here in my state I can legally buy and own a suppressor or a machine gun. A rusty old WW2 Mauser would be a drastic downgrade.

The problem I have with background checks is that a NICS check doesn't tell me what you are going to do tomorrow with the gun I sell you today. A background check only tells me what you did in the past, or more accurately, what you got caught doing in the past. That's why we see so many reports "The shooter legally purchased the gun used.." or "The shooter passed the background check..." so MORE background checks won't accomplish a thing.

If you think more laws is the answer, survey your state prison for how many people are incarcerated for drug offenses. Because, you know, drug laws have worked so well in the 40-year old money pit we called the "war against drugs". They've worked so well that It's now called the "opioid epidemic" here in the 21st century, and we're still throwing tens of million dollars at it annually and making more laws.
 
Back
Top