Charlie Kirk shot at Utah event, suspect in custody

🙄

Saint Charlie says (said):

“Kirk had every right to his views and to the way that he expressed them, even if he did not support that right for other people. He founded the Professor Watchlist, committed to singling out academics he believed discriminated against conservative views, scholarship, and students, leading to threats against some of the instructors named. He regularly attacked the LGBTQ community, saying, “God’s perfect law…[says gay people] shall be stoned to death.” He claimed the Civil Rights Act was “a huge mistake,” and called the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. “an awful person.” He mocked the 2023 political assault on Nancy Pelosi’s husband, Paul, and even suggested someone should bail his assailant out of jail. Kirk even attempted to link Minnesota Governor Tim Walz to the assassination of Walz’s close friend and ally, State Senator Melissa Hortman.

Ironically—if that word is even possible to use in 2023—he said, “I think it’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights.”

😳

I’m anti ALL of that ^ heinous bile Saint Charlie regularly spewed, so…

😑



🙄

Being temporarily unemployed from a teaching gig in Florida is preferable to being permanently un-alived from a rich lifestyle in Utah…imho…

Just sayin'…

😑

We. Told. Them. So.

🌷
So, some comments taking out of context, some biblical quotes, some personal opinions which expose the left’s ideological hatred for free speech therefore shooting him is justified. But yet threatening rhetoric from Pelosi, Schumer, Waters, Alan Green and most of all Joe Biden is acceptable because is suppresses the right’s 1st amendment rights directly or indirectly using veiled threats while gaslighting the American people.

Judging from your reaction to the shooting, of course you believe, based on your ability to manipulate dialogue, extrapolate out of context comments made in a free exchange of ideas and open dialogue some of which is in direct conflict with leftist ideology, or anyone who directly challenges leftist doctrine should be shot and the threat eliminated.

An interviewer on the street interviewing college students after the shooting asked a young woman that if she had a magic button would she bring Charlie back. Her answer was a great big NO!! followed up with and I paraphrase “ it needed to happen, he had to go”. Horrifying statement exposing the product that is being created from these anti free speech incubators we call higher learning. Reminds me of 1934.
 
So, some comments taking out of context, some biblical quotes, some personal opinions which expose the left’s ideological hatred for free speech therefore shooting him is justified. But yet threatening rhetoric from Pelosi, Schumer, Waters, Alan Green and most of all Joe Biden is acceptable because is suppresses the right’s 1st amendment rights directly or indirectly using veiled threats while gaslighting the American people.

Judging from your reaction to the shooting, of course you believe, based on your ability to manipulate dialogue, extrapolate out of context comments made in a free exchange of ideas and open dialogue some of which is in direct conflict with leftist ideology, or anyone who directly challenges leftist doctrine should be shot and the threat eliminated.

An interviewer on the street interviewing college students after the shooting asked a young woman that if she had a magic button would she bring Charlie back. Her answer was a great big NO!! followed up with and I paraphrase “ it needed to happen, he had to go”. Horrifying statement exposing the product that is being created from these anti free speech incubators we call higher learning. Reminds me of 1934.
Scary shit coming out of the Universities these days.
 
Well that easy, just start with 2016 and the democrat party. They used every unethical dirty political stunt to ruin his administration till this day. You know the list, I’m not going through it again.
*Democratic
 
Well that easy, just start with 2016 and the democrat party. They used every unethical dirty political stunt to ruin his administration till this day. You know the list, I’m not going through it again.
I also know "the list" mostly consists of accusations against Trump that are demonstrably true. Most relevant for this thread: he has repeatedly condoned or even encouraged violence against one's political opponents.
 
Derpy always ignores a challenge to his lies and hypocrisy.

He still refuses to acknowledge that he was wrong when he said repeatedly that it was appropriate to use Signal Chat to discuss an ongoing military operation. It's pathetic.
He also said that trump is spending less on the military than President Biden. He got shut up with the quickness.
 
Nobody cares what you think. :)
Can everybody who doesn't care what Bn2f thinks please go the trouble of responding, because if you just ignore his post everyone will think you do care (smiley face, smiley face).

For the monumentally stupid amongst you I have not replied (yet) to Bm2f so you know what that means (smiley face, smiley face)
 
Back
Top