Can someone PLEASE explain to me what the difference is between

[LJ_Reloaded]

how right wingers talk about Muslims after an Islamic terrorist incident

and how feminists talk about men after some Elliot Rodgers style rampage?

What's the difference? Please list them.

There was a shooting I think less than a day ago in Paris at some satire newspaper and 12 people died. I'm on 3 other forums and it's all ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF VIOLENCE STOMP THE MUSLIMS STOP MUSLIM IMMIGRATION BLAH BLAH BLAH

same EXACT bullshit that broke out after the Rodgers incident.

Okay, I'll list one difference between the feminists and the Islamophobes: someone probably actually will go on a shooting rampage at a Mosque and kill innocent people. Feminists haven't done it because they couldn't aim well enough to pull that off: can't imagine any other reason why their blood rage hasn't exploded into gun rampages.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

They could explain it, but it would go over your head.

 

[badbabysitter]

how right wingers talk about Muslims after an Islamic terrorist incident

and how feminists talk about men after some Elliot Rodgers style rampage?

What's the difference? Please list them.

There was a shooting I think less than a day ago in Paris at some satire newspaper and 12 people died. I'm on 3 other forums and it's all ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF VIOLENCE STOMP THE MUSLIMS STOP MUSLIM IMMIGRATION BLAH BLAH BLAH

same EXACT bullshit that broke out after the Rodgers incident.

Okay, I'll list one difference between the feminists and the Islamophobes: someone probably actually will go on a shooting rampage at a Mosque and kill innocent people. Feminists haven't done it because they couldn't aim well enough to pull that off: can't imagine any other reason why their blood rage hasn't exploded into gun rampages.

you a re really out doing yourself when it comes to false equivalencies lately

some feminists did indeed blame the Rodgers shooting on the MRA,, so did large chunkc of the media... but your outrage is about feminists as usal, and not the mdeia

but most people and most feminists decried it on its inherent nature of misogyny

Fundamentalists will always try to justify thier crimes in the name of God

Rodgers didnt.. he was an entitled whiner who hated women

that's the difference...one person gets God to justify their actions... the other just hated women


the right will always paint muslims as terrorists... and feminists will always paint misogynistic mass murderers as bad people... I'm sorry if you feel he isnt getting painted with the same broad strokes

and nice job with the " women can't shoot" thing... nothing quite like hating the evils of evil feminism with plain old fashioned sexism

 

[lemonbread]

Are you saying girls can't aim? Mysogeny! Mysogeny everywhere!

 

[badbabysitter]

Are you saying girls can't aim? Mysogeny! Mysogeny everywhere!

anyone that points that out,,, clearly hates men

duhhhhhh

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Are you saying girls can't aim? Mysogeny! Mysogeny everywhere!

I said feminists, not girls.

There is a big fat difference.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

anyone that points that out,,, clearly hates men

duhhhhhh

Anyone who makes fun of or criticizes feminism hates women in your book. Same level of stupidity and you engage in it.

 

[badbabysitter]

Anyone who makes fun of or criticizes feminism hates women in your book. Same level of stupidity and you engage in it.

If 90% of what a person posts is critical of women and feminism and often lumps them together....it doesnt take a genius to see that person has deep rooted issues about women

and the guy that thinks the Daily Caller isnt a conservative rag doesnt get to lecture anyone on stupidity

 

[badbabysitter]

I said feminists, not girls.

There is a big fat difference.

so you have empirical proof that feminists cant shoot


making a comment on a persons ability to use a rifle based solely on their gender politics

remember your whine fests about about how you hate when feminists are derisive on the MRA, and you wish how things could be covil

hows that working for you?

 

[Liar]

how right wingers talk about Muslims after an Islamic terrorist incident

and how feminists talk about men after some Elliot Rodgers style rampage?

...or how you talk about feminists?

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

so you have empirical proof that feminists cant shoot


making a comment on a persons ability to use a rifle based solely on their gender politics

remember your whine fests about about how you hate when feminists are derisive on the MRA, and you wish how things could be covil

hows that working for you?

ROTFLMAO

Feminists are always going to derisive of the men's rights movement. How's that working for me? Things cannot be civil when feminism will only allow any honest discussion of men's rights OVER THEIR DEAD FUCKING BODIES.

This is the SAME PROBLEM women have in discussing WOMEN'S RIGHTS with CONSERVATIVES.

You people and the TRADCONS are two heads sharing the same bigoted heart, looking in opposite directions. BOTH your groups are enemies of individual liberty and equality.

Google "Horseshoe theory" will ya? Or wait, I can post it right here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horseshoe_theory

The horseshoe theory in political science asserts that rather than the far left and the far right being at opposite and opposing ends of a linear political continuum, they in fact closely resemble one another, much like the ends of a horseshoe. The theory is attributed to French writer Jean-Pierre Faye.[1]

In University of Reading academic Peter Barker's[2] book, GDR and Its History, Peter Thompson[3] of the University of Sheffield observes that the theory is "increasingly orthodox," and describes the theory as seeing "left and right-wing parties being closer to each other than the centre."

I know this is too much for your brain to process and you probably won't address this but

When you have a situation where 80% of Americans want gender equality and they still don't want to be called feminists, and Republicans are clinging to life on the dresses of white married women because they've lost EVERYONE else with an X chromosome, and the GOP's OWN POLLS find women say they're outdated, and Women Against Feminism exploded in you guys's faces this year, too?

You have a problem, badbabysitter. And it's not me.

Your movement needs to do some soul-searching.

 

[badbabysitter]

so it's feminism's fault that you chose to act in a certain way

it's feminisms fault that you declare a desire for civil discourse and then choose to be completely uncivil

stop blaming something else for the decisions you make

my movement isnt my movement...it's part of a philsophy I have

before you lecture me on soul searching.. maybe you should ask yourself why you blame others for the choices you make

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

so it's feminism's fault that you chose to act in a certain way

it's feminisms fault that you declare a desire for civil discourse and then choose to be completely uncivil

stop blaming something else for the decisions you make

my movement isnt my movement...it's part of a philsophy I have

before you lecture me on soul searching.. maybe you should ask yourself why you blame others for the choices you make

There you go again, blaming me for YOUR movement's extremism.

Women Against Feminism became a thing in 2014.
80% of Americans don't LIKE to be associated with feminism.

It's NOT ME, Badbabysitter. It's you. You guys are just like the Republicans, but the opposite way.

80%

80%

80%

 

[PoppingTom]

80% of Americans don't LIKE to be associated with feminism.

20 % is a huge number, I think.

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

Are you saying girls can't aim? Mysogeny! Mysogeny everywhere!

To be fair, there was that white chick who went on a shooting rampage, shot at multiple people in various locations and didn't hit a single person. Somehow the police apprehended her without insult nor injury.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

20 % is a huge number, I think.

Unlike 80%, which is totally negligible.

To be fair, there was that white chick who went on a shooting rampage, shot at multiple people in various locations and didn't hit a single person. Somehow the police apprehended her without insult nor injury.

Does it not seem odd that everyone on here sees bagging on feminists to be the same as bagging on women when 80% of the country believes in equality but STILL doesn't want to be identified with feminism, and feminists lost their shit this year over the outbreak of WOMEN against feminism?

There's something in the water here that these people drink. There's no other explanation for why they think bashing feminists is the same as bashing women. Some 70-80% of whom don't want to be called feminists.

It's like bashing Republicans and being told that's the same as BASHING AMERICA.

The Horseshoe theory not only survives, it thrives.