unclej
a work in progress
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2002
- Posts
- 3,205
you will seldom see me get involved with a political thread because i'm not very interested in nor knowledgeable of the subject. so this is not really a discussion type thread but an honest question to those of you that have made a study of such things.
in texas right now there are a lot of campaigns going on and with only one exception that i can think of they are all negative. "joe blow did this and lied to you about it." "jose schwartz is a crook and molests little children". when, in the history of state and national politics did it become all right and sucessful to run a negative campaign that not once addresses any of the real issues or allows the voters to get to know anything at all about the candidates? when did we get to the point that we accepted it as the norm?
in texas right now there are a lot of campaigns going on and with only one exception that i can think of they are all negative. "joe blow did this and lied to you about it." "jose schwartz is a crook and molests little children". when, in the history of state and national politics did it become all right and sucessful to run a negative campaign that not once addresses any of the real issues or allows the voters to get to know anything at all about the candidates? when did we get to the point that we accepted it as the norm?