The Second Amendment is premised on the assumption that "well regulated Militia" is "necessary to the security of a free State" -- but it's not -- is it? There are countries all around the world that manage to have both freedom and security without any such thing. The police and the Army are so necessary. But the reserve militia is not -- you can tell by the fact that it has never, ever been mobilized. In fact, not even the state National Guards are strictly necessary to our freedom and security -- they're good to have, certainly, in event of natural disaster or civil unrest, and as a reserve of trained troops for wartime -- but we could probably get along without them.
Our Founding Fathers were wrong about some things, and this is apparently one of them.
Our Founding Fathers were wrong about some things, and this is apparently one of them.