Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
sir_Winston54 said:<Standing and applauding serijules for a wonderfully cogent and concise explanation.>
serijules said:
I bottom to many. I submit to one.
Sounds to me like it falls into the great PYL/pyl debate
Netzach said:submissive is a personality trait, bottom is a position. You could be Dominant, submissive, a curious frat boy or a freaky fetishist and still bottom.
Safphyre said:All very good explanations ...thank you all very much
...pssstt... ID ... pyl = pick your label, it's about one of the only things I DO know![]()
The Mutt said:All in all, I prefer the term Slave. I do not grovel or toady, but I do obey. I serve. I belong to my Mistress, Miss Oatlash. She uses me as she sees fit
If it is her desire that I take her roughly, I gladly obey.
If it is her desire that I submit to her lash, I gladly obey.
My body is hers, but my soul is my own.
I live to serve. Willingly. Happily. Lovingly.
![]()
ownedsubgal said:a submissive submits because they can do nothing else. it's their personality and they MUST submit...whether they want to or don't want to, whether they enjoy it or don't enjoy it. jmo
serijules said:I would call that a slave myself.
ownedsubgal said:i'm one of those strange birds that define slave as one who is owned by another. but i do realize that many would label what i'd consider to simply be a true submissive, as a slave.
serijules said:Your definition just sounds so...grim, I guess. Like a submissive by your definition has no choice in the matter, almost like it is a handicap, something they were born with and have no way to overcome. That they get no pleasure from it, don't get turned on by it.
I realize that is not what you mean at all, it's just one of those statements that I think needs a bit more explanation to really be leave a positive feeling, at least for me.
ownedsubgal said:serijules, that's actually exactly how i felt about myself before i discovered the D/s lifestyle. i didn't know the word for what i was..."submissive"...but i knew that i was different, that i felt weak and powerless and that i hated that. i hated always being used and abused and afraid of the world. being born submissive is not a handicap, but it can make for a difficult life. that is a fact. just as in my parents' day being born black often made for a difficult life. but hopefully, one can reach a point where they grow to appreciate and possibly even love who they are, see the beauty in themselves. that is what happened for me when i discovered that i was a submissive, and that there was a place in the world for people like me. that yeah, i was probably different from most, but that that was a GOOD thing.
i do indeed believe a submissive has no choice in whether they are submissive or not...it is just who they are. and yes often it is not what they want to do or who they want to be. submitting does not always turn me on or give me some sort of pleasure. often i have disliked, loathed, been disgusted by it. and then there have been the good times, the times it was wonderful. but whether i submit or not has nothing to do with whether i will or won't find pleasure from it. as i said, that would be a bottom. but again that's jmo.
Safphyre said:Basically there is no set standard for these labels ..as with most of the labels that get thrown around ... some fundamental things are assumed but from there ...it is all open to interpretation.