Botany Boy & Rob

Is Rob’s use of racist language okay?


  • Total voters
    35
I like how both Rob and Bot voted for the last option.

They should have a beer and smoke a bowl together. :cool:

I don't smoke pot. The federal government says it's a Schedule 1 drug that leads to addictions, not unlike heroin and morphine. My body is a temple, I don't want to pollute it with illegal drugs.
*nods*
 
>>>Offended by racism LOLOLOLOLOLOL>>>>

Not at all.

Just laughing at a hypocrite who's ssoooooo progressive and virtue signals for social justice at every opportunity.

Until someone not-white disagrees with you LOL
 
Speaking of racial slurs, am I the only one that's noticed beebs has cut back on his? Or have I been gone and haven't noticed it?

As to Rob? Annoying af. I realize they like to bait each other but one can easily denigrate another poster without resorting to racial slurs. BotBoy 1, Rob 0. Sorry, Rob, you're not stupid, you can do better, try calling him an 'anarchist', BotBoy loves that shit. ;)

Fucking anarchist.....Jesus tiddy fuckin' Christ on a Cross trainer. :D
 
Speaking of racial slurs, am I the only one that's noticed beebs has cut back on his? Or have I been gone and haven't noticed it?


Not having a black president anymore probably makes a difference there; his main use of "nigger" these days is when he's talking to or about me.


As to Rob? Annoying af. I realize they like to bait each other but one can easily denigrate another poster without resorting to racial slurs. BotBoy 1, Rob 0. Sorry, Rob, you're not stupid, you can do better, try calling him an 'anarchist', BotBoy loves that shit. ;)


Actual anarchists aren't in love with the president (any president), so that's as fake as anything else about the guy.
 
Comrade Rob wouldn't be interested.
:cool:

Gotta love it when the GB Welfare Queen refers to me as "Comrade".
Remind me again, who gets his government check each month as his primary means of support?
Hint: It ain't me, mooch.

"My country tis of thee,
sweet cash for Comrade Lee
It is so plain to see:
Hy-poc-crisy

Money from you and me
for "disability"
Welfare queen royalty:
Call him "moochie"
 
Actual anarchists aren't in love with the president (any president), so that's as fake as anything else about the guy.

In love with the POTUS?

Fake??

LOL...not being a USA loathing socialist and advanced TDS sufferer doesn't make me fake or in love with the POTUS.

Hey now! Let's not get our Anarchist/ Libertarian panties in a twist or you might go full Socialist on me. :D

Uh oh...your backing off that anarchism :D

Having a number social liberal positions I don't think I'd qualify as a libertarian, but I'd never lower myself to such lows as socialism. :cool:
 
Gotta love it when the GB Welfare Queen refers to me as "Comrade".
Remind me again, who gets his government check each month as his primary means of support?
Hint: It ain't me, mooch.

You're the advocate of socialism comrade.

You're the one who supports government nationalizing a number of industries and markets, confiscating wealth/resources and redistributing them to provide more equal outcomes for all.

I don't get welfare nor is a government check my primary means of support.

Your lies and fantasies not withstanding of course. :)
 
You're the advocate of socialism comrade.

I don't get welfare nor is a government check my primary means of support.

Your lies and fantasies not withstanding of course. :)
https://i.imgur.com/MO2MhMC.jpg

I advocate Medicare For All, period.

The same medical care that you get, the one where you don't pay one fucking dime out of pocket.

The same medical care you would deny to others as part of your shitsludge personal philosophy.

We both know you cannot rationalize that hypocrisy, so instead you ascribe to my support for Medicare For All to include nationalizing all private industries, "open borders" and overall hatred for America.

I don't support any of that, of course, but you are fundamentally incapable of debating a topic on its merits. :D
 
K, another thing I find annoying is calling veteran's pensions welfare. I had a client who was a Sergeant in the CAF. He did several tours in Afghanistan. He was responsible for calling in air strikes. He figures he killed thousands of people with one push of a button. Twitchy motherfucker now. I'm quite happy to pay a pension for that guy, rather that than working beside him when he goes all Columbine on people's asses.
 
K, another thing I find annoying is calling veteran's pensions welfare. I had a client who was a Sergeant in the CAF. He did several tours in Afghanistan. He was responsible for calling in air strikes. He figures he killed thousands of people with one push of a button. Twitchy motherfucker now. I'm quite happy to pay a pension for that guy, rather that than working beside him when he goes all Columbine on people's asses.

Yeah that bugs me too. It's part of the compensation package that all veterans get and deserve. Far from welfare
 
I advocate Medicare For All, period.

Which according to the (D)'s who want to do it would include nationalizing our HC/insurance industries....COMRADE.

The same medical care that you get,

Not the same. No matter how much you try to lie about it.

The same medical care you would deny to others

More lies, I never once advocated denying veterans medical care.

Being a social liberal I even support public HC systems.

I just don't want to eliminate private HC to do it. I think we should provide a public HC service without prohibiting/interfering with/effectively controlling or otherwise ending private HC. Because I'm a liberal, not a socialist. Unlike you and your "progressive" comrades in the DNC right now who support the totalitarian government takeover of HC.

You do understand the difference between providing a public service and the government takeover of an entire industry right?

You do understanding you're supporting the latter not the former right??

I don't support any of that, of course, but you are fundamentally incapable of debating a topic on its merits. :D

You just did advocate that with your support for "medicare for all" and you regularly support and defend (D) politicians who support some or all that.

So what is it Rob?? Do you support the collectivizing/nationalizing of one or more major industry/markets in the US economy or not??

Can't have it both ways.
 
Last edited:
K, another thing I find annoying is calling veteran's pensions welfare. I had a client who was a Sergeant in the CAF. He did several tours in Afghanistan. He was responsible for calling in air strikes. He figures he killed thousands of people with one push of a button. Twitchy motherfucker now. I'm quite happy to pay a pension for that guy, rather that than working beside him when he goes all Columbine on people's asses.

Yeah that bugs me too. It's part of the compensation package that all veterans get and deserve. Far from welfare

Thanks y'all....been trying to explain to Rob for years that veterans benefits aren't handouts as he's so fond of calling them.

Much like people of color, he really dislikes veterans.
 
Gotta love it when the GB Welfare Queen refers to me as "Comrade".
Remind me again, who gets his government check each month as his primary means of support?
Hint: It ain't me, mooch.

"My country tis of thee,
sweet cash for Comrade Lee
It is so plain to see:
Hy-poc-crisy

Money from you and me
for "disability"
Welfare queen royalty:
Call him "moochie"

If his military pension is "welfare" then you and your family of recipient malingerers have been shirking your duty.:rolleyes:
 
I advocate Medicare For All, period.

The same medical care that you get, the one where you don't pay one fucking dime out of pocket.

The same medical care you would deny to others as part of your shitsludge personal philosophy.

We both know you cannot rationalize that hypocrisy, so instead you ascribe to my support for Medicare For All to include nationalizing all private industries, "open borders" and overall hatred for America.

I don't support any of that, of course, but you are fundamentally incapable of debating a topic on its merits. :D


You do understand that the corporate wealthy 1%ters would be let off the hook if medicare for all became the law of the land. Right now many businesses provide health care coverage for their employees, if the law passes those businesses could add to their wealth by subtraction and not spending on employee health care. Just a thought.
 
You do understand that the corporate wealthy 1%ters would be let off the hook if medicare for all became the law of the land. Right now many businesses provide health care coverage for their employees, if the law passes those businesses could add to their wealth by subtraction and not spending on employee health care. Just a thought.

When the taxes for the cost of that come down they will lose their fucking ass.

Not to mention now everyone else has to pick up the tab for the fact that there is no more private HC industry making fuck tons of money. 3.3 Trillion just BOOM instantly sucked out of the US economy by socialism. 17.8% of the US GDP will be legislated out of existence by the "progressive" (D)umbass's if they get what they want.

AND on top of that if "progressives" get their way with open borders? The whole fucking planet will be flooding our newly taken over free for the world no ID needed gubbmint HC centers.

BTW....they also want the energy(4.2T ) and agricultural (1T ) industries nationalized too, a little less than half the US economy when combined with HC.

You want to talk about a recession? LOL legislate almost half the US economy out of existence like Rob and his "progressive" buddies all want and you'll get one. :D
 
Last edited:
When the taxes for the cost of that come down they will lose their fucking ass.

Not to mention now everyone else has to pick up the tab for the fact that there is no more private HC industry making fuck tons of money. 3.3 Trillion just BOOM instantly sucked out of the US economy by socialism. 17.8% of the US GDP will be legislated out of existence by the "progressive" (D)umbass's if they get what they want.

AND on top of that if "progressives" get their way with open borders? The whole fucking planet will be flooding our newly taken over free for the world no ID needed gubbmint HC centers.

BTW....they also want the energy(4.2T ) and agricultural (1T ) industries nationalized too, a little less than half the US economy when combined with HC.

You want to talk about a recession? LOL legislate almost half the US economy out of existence like Rob and his "progressive" buddies all want and you'll get one. :D

All of the blame for almost everything wrong with America today can be placed squarely on central planning, the hallmark of big government.
 
When the taxes for the cost of that come down they will lose their fucking ass.

Not to mention now everyone else has to pick up the tab for the fact that there is no more private HC industry making fuck tons of money. 3.3 Trillion just BOOM instantly sucked out of the US economy by socialism. 17.8% of the US GDP will be legislated out of existence by the "progressive" (D)umbass's if they get what they want.

AND on top of that if "progressives" get their way with open borders? The whole fucking planet will be flooding our newly taken over free for the world no ID needed gubbmint HC centers.

BTW....they also want the energy(4.2T ) and agricultural (1T ) industries nationalized too, a little less than half the US economy when combined with HC.

You want to talk about a recession? LOL legislate almost half the US economy out of existence like Rob and his "progressive" buddies all want and you'll get one. :D

It was sarcasm. Medicare for all will not work. I agree, it would destroy our economy as well as the health care system. Career Health care people would exit the field, innovation would widdle away. All you need for evidence is how the feds run the VA, they're finally getting access to care through the private sector. It equate to killing a flea with a 12 lb sledge hammer.
 
Back
Top