BOMBSHELL, but really we knew this, didnt we?

[Guest]

 

[cjh]

when did this thread turn into a marx brothers skit?

 

[Guest]

 

[cjh]

About the time BB and Perg lost their focus....LMASO

*shakes head

yeah, i read about perg's focus.

and BB?

 

[Guest]

 

[cjh]

Perg mention his wife and well, I'm not sure after that...

i think he's wooing that sharon lady in that thread yonder.

 

[Peregrinator]

Why a duck? Why-a no goose?

 

[Guest]

 

[busybody..]

Why a duck? Why-a no goose?

Comedy is not your schtick

leave it to us pros

after all, my alter ego is named

Sly Stchik!


OK, sorry about the wife comment

































































but if she did say it, shouldnt I tell you?













































































ok, I lied, she didnt say it to me










































































she whispered it in my ear, seductive like

 

[Cap’n AMatrixca]

It's schtick and it ain't funny if you can't even spell it...

Is it still the dawg?

 

[busybody..]

It's schtick and it ain't funny if you can't even spell it...

Is it still the dawg?

?????????????????

 

[busybody..]

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/011/971dyipm.asp

these guys have been out front on this issue

 

[busybody..]

once again, only I bring you the best stuff


THE IRAQ FILES [Andy McCarthy]

The WSJ editorial page extends well deserved kudos this morning to House Intelligence Committee Chairman Pete Hoekstra (R-MI) and Senator Rick Santorum (R-PA) for their vital effort in pushing the intelligence community, finally, to agree to a rapid release of the trove of documents seized from the Saddam Hussein regime.

The administration’s flat-footedness on this has never been fathomable. The reason that has always made the most sense for invading Iraq and deposing Saddam was that he was an assiduous, historic facilitator of Islamist terrorism – harboring terrorists, financing them, and providing training, safe-passage and, perhaps, even operational support.

Thanks to tireless work by folks like Steve Hayes (at the Weekly Standard) and Tom Joscelyn (at both the standard and at Tom’s website, here, which is a must-read for those who follow national security issues), we already know that the relative smidgeon of the Iraq files that has eeked out so far underscores Saddam’s dalliances with bin Laden and his affiliates. But there’s tons more information to wade through, and now it looks like we’ll be able to do that.

This war was about national security, and the imperative of eradicating the Islamist terror network and states that promote it. It was not about democracy-building. The legacy of the Iraq war critically depends not on what kind of government Iraq ends up having, but on making the public case that Saddam was a terror-monger – that he was leading the paragon of regime-type President Bush rightly said had to change or be ousted right after 9/11.

For too long, people in the intelligence community (who were vested in the delusion that secular Saddam would never make common cause with Islamo-fascists), and people in the media and on the Left (who revile the administration) have been in no great hurry to see come to light evidence that would support the Iraq initiative. (For example, with all the news we read about intelligence failure in Iraq, how often have you seen reported in the mainstream press what Steve reported a few months ago in the Standard: to wit, that we are holding in Gitmo an Iraqi who is charged with having gone to Pakistan with Iraqi intelligence to explore blowing up the U.S. embassy there in August 1998 … the very same month al Qaeda blew up our embassies in Kenya and Tanzania)

Now, maybe we’ll get to see who was right and who was wrong.

 

[busybody..]

not that any of you low life's scuzz balls

deserve this

nor do you care

but more good reads

on what the first RELEASED DOCUMENTS show

Be certain, if they support Bush, and they will, YOU will never ever see it in the ANTIQUE MEDIA!


http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/011/975brvct.asp

 

[busybody..]

Good post on Free Republic on one of the documents posted without a translation. It is an Iraqi intelligence report from September 15, 2001. It states:

"1. That Osama Bin Laden and the Taliban in Afghanistan are in contact with Iraq and it that previously a group from Taliban and Osama Bin Laden group visited Iraq.

2. That America has proof that the government of Iraq and Osama Bin Laden group have shown cooperation to hit target within America."

Why wasn't this posted with a translation? Wouldn't that qualify as salient information people should know about? Sometimes I really have to wonder if all the components of the government are in this war to win it.

 

[Hikari]

I honestly think this is just another excuse to blow up countries the government is afraid of or doesn't like...

 

[busybody..]

Good

More cunt-ries, please

 

[Traveler32]

Very curious, very curious indeed. It would appear that the craven Israeli press are trying to protect Syria when WE ALL REALLY KNOW that Sadam had chemical WMDs and shipped them in the dead of night to Syria. Damn Liberal Jews... soft on Arabs I tell ya.

Sadam's apologists - the Israeli press

 

[Traveler32]

The Israeli press disarms your bombshell and it passes without comment?

Guess a former member of Sadam's regime is more credible for you than an Israeli rag?

Maybe it was marshmallows after all

 

[busybody..]

you misunderstood the article

but you are right in one aspect

You are NOT as bright as you look

 

[Traveler32]

you misunderstood the article

but you are right in one aspect

You are NOT as bright as you look

I did? Interesting, perhaps you'll enlighten me? Like most press copy, its written on a 5th grade level, hell I done gradumated from the 7th grade.

 

[busybody..]

Cliff Notes versin for you

1- Israel believes Iraq had WMDs

2- Most seem to believe the Israeli evidence is weak

3- Even SH didnt know what he had or didnt have

4- If SH did suspect he didnt REALLY have all, he FAKED it to keep his enemies, such as Israel at bay

 

[Traveler32]

Cliff Notes versin for you

1- Israel believes Iraq had WMDs

2- Most seem to believe the Israeli evidence is weak

3- Even SH didnt know what he had or didnt have

4- If SH did suspect he didnt REALLY have all, he FAKED it to keep his enemies, such as Israel at bay

So, what we're left with by way of evidence that SH had WMDs is his willingness to say he he them?

I'd venture that if the Mossad had evidence of clandestine shipments to Syria they'd be all over that, wouldn't you?

 

[busybody..]

yes

truth be told

is that there is credible evidence he had SOMETHING, maybe not as much as we thought, and that SOMETHING was shipped out

 

[Traveler32]

yes

truth be told

is that there is credible evidence he had SOMETHING, maybe not as much as we thought, and that SOMETHING was shipped out

Any guess as to why Israel has been silent on this matter? Seems to be most unusual behavior for them, especially given Syria's apparent complicity.