Blurting it out....Playground style

Status
Not open for further replies.
if you keep going west or southwest from where I'm at....it's pretty desolate. miles and miles of nothing could be considered fugly

When you're surrounded by a bunch of something? Sometimes nothing

is really nice.
 
iggy iggy iggy!

:D

is that cunt still bleating?

who gives a rodent's rectum?

now, the sun's out, who's coming to skeggy? :D

I just love the UK use of the word "cunt" in this context. It reminds me of when the composer Malcolm Arnold called all of the people in the LSO (I think) cunt because they were not playing his music properly. It's such an elegant word for such things. Sadly we don't use it in the states that way.
 
Bear with me a sec, and please be assured that nothing I'm saying is meant as a personal attack against you. (You've seemed to take offense to a lot of what I've said, when that was not my intent.)

I

This is what we take offense to. Heres a post of yours on the incest thread.


For all my fellow incest-lovers, I'd like to share my latest story with you:

http://www.literotica.com/s/daddys-little-psychopath

Just to fore-warn, it's a father/daughter non-consent, blackmail psycho-triller with a twist! I hope you enjoy it.
 
We'll talk about this later... stick to this conversation now at this moment.;)

Why? I clearly made my point to you, your 'standing up' does not help, it does not make the issue go away, it will not make the thread go away, it will not stop incest from happening, it will not stop victims from being victims, it will not help victims, denouncing it does not stop it, all you have managed to do here is continue to jump up and down on a subject that you have no personal first hand experience on and raise your objections and in doing so, dismiss my choice in the way I deal with the matter by choosing to ignore the thread.

It seems that all you are doing is handing over the issue to another person at the time in which it suits - you are choosing your own battles and not accepting the fight which is clearly on your threshold
 
Bear with me a sec, and please be assured that nothing I'm saying is meant as a personal attack against you. (You've seemed to take offense to a lot of what I've said, when that was not my intent.)

In debating, you cannot use the most extreme example of an argument as a representative of the entire argument. If your argument is that "incest can be good", it cannot be taken by the other that your argument is instead "ALL incest is good". That is called a "strawman fallacy".

In this case, I am aware that NOT all incest is good. However, I'm also aware that not all of it is bad. I ABHOR . . . absolutely LOATHE . . . any form of sexual activity that destroys lives, whether it be pedophilia, rape, incest, cheating, spreading disease . . . you name it. To me, it's all equally deplorable.

However, I think that every single person should have the right to explore their own sexual identity in a secure and intelligent manner. Not everyone will succeed, but everyone should have the right. Thus, I asked if it wer bad if two people who fall in love but happen to be related. If you believe that it is not bad, then we're getting somewhere. It means it's not incest in itself you find bad, but the incest which is done carelessly or maliciously, and I fully agree.


Again, not what I said...

and I believe I qualified my original point by stating very clearly that I knew the people I was talking about exist at the very margins of experience and therefore were very likely not representative

Thanks for the lesson on debating, your patronage is gratefully recieved
 
I just love the UK use of the word "cunt" in this context. It reminds me of when the composer Malcolm Arnold called all of the people in the LSO (I think) cunt because they were not playing his music properly. It's such an elegant word for such things. Sadly we don't use it in the states that way.

appropriate use of the C 'bomb', eh? ;)

... especially when in context with that cunt.

and here's a scene that uses the word succinctly.

click
 
I hope she makes my hair all flippy...Mrs H is my hair flippy hero:kiss:

laters...if you're lucky;)
 
This is what we take offense to. Heres a post of yours on the incest thread.

So?

As I said before, fantasy is not reality. Nor does what I write reflect what I believe.

I fantasize about being Batman, but I know how insane it is.

I fantasize about non-consent incest, but I know how insane it is.
 
In debating, you cannot use the most extreme example of an argument as a representative of the entire argument. If your argument is that "incest can be good", it cannot be taken by the other that your argument is instead "ALL incest is good". That is called a "strawman fallacy".

On the contrary it depends upon the subject being debated.

On say the subject of Nuclear power. You could argue that if only the smallest percentage of reactors leaked, it could be argued the whole enterprise was not justified.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top