Blurting it out....Playground style

[WboroBaptM0134]

I am not superior nor do I think I am. I just fight my battles where they should be fought.

This is worth fighting, and would take a small effort on your part to add your voice to the condemnation of incest threads.

 

[Golden_Silence]

We've talked about this before, and I'm not going to pay attention to assumptions on your part.

Where have we talked about this before? Oh, so you are going to ignore me now then?

It sucks when people make assumptions doesn't it?

 

[Wyldfire]

I remember a time when this thread was a random blurt thread and not a chat room.

 

[WboroBaptM0134]

This has been fun, but I think I'm going to masturbate now.

You're not really up to debate are you?

You asked some questions, I answered, gave reasons, and then you declared me incompetent and foolish.

 

[bisolom]

Anyone got change for the bus?

I save all my change so I have plenty.
How much do you need?

 

[Golden_Silence]

This has been fun, but I think I'm going to masturbate now.

Knock one out for me would ya? I'm busy yanking the minister's chains right now

 

[janeyl]

Why? If someone meets a half-sister they've never met before and the two fall in love, that wouldn't be consensual?

I think that that is a disingenuous argument which is miles away from the very close familial relationships that are often advocated there with all of the hugely complicated dynamics involved

if you're trying to get me to say...ah well, but that's different...then bravo! You've won-it is indeed very different-and you know it

 

[DarkSimian]

I remember a time when this thread was a random blurt thread and not a chat room.

it seems like such a long time ago....lol

 

[WboroBaptM0134]

Where have we talked about this before? Oh, so you are going to ignore me now then?

It sucks when people make assumptions doesn't it?

I'll never ignore you, maybe I talked about it with someone else, sorry hard to keep track of everything.

 

[CaliGuy60]

You're not really up to debate are you?

You asked some questions, I answered, gave reasons, and then you declared me incompetent and foolish.

Actually you pretty much did that yourself. Read the record carefully. I don't have anymore to add at this point.

And I come here because I like to masturbate.

 

[WboroBaptM0134]

To quote Groucho Marx, "I would never join any group that would have me as a member."

Yeah I like that one...

 

[janeyl]

I'm just going to say this:

in an infinite multiverse, all things are possible. somewhere, Im sure that incest, necrophilia, beastiality, and mimes are all accepted and encouraged.

Sir...you go too far...

now go to your room

 

[DarkSimian]

personally, I think we should ban mime sex. I think that's something we can ALL agree upon....

 

[DarkSimian]

Sir...you go too far...

now go to your room

awww, man! I never get to have any fun

 

[WboroBaptM0134]

Actually you pretty much did that yourself. Read the record carefully. I don't have anymore to add at this point.

And I come here because I like to masturbate.

No I'm sorry, thats just wrong, no matter how much you'd like it to be otherwise.

If you say my reasonings faulty, the burden is on you to to explain why.

Now explain... or you cannot be taken seriously.

 

[geronimo_appleby]

iggy iggy iggy!



is that cunt still bleating?

who gives a rodent's rectum?

now, the sun's out, who's coming to skeggy?

 

[DarkSimian]

Sir...you go too far...

now go to your room

can I go to YOUR room? I'm sure it's much more interesting.....

 

[janeyl]

This has been fun, but I think I'm going to masturbate now.

Pics...just sayin'

 

[Golden_Silence]

I'll never ignore you, maybe I talked about it with someone else, sorry hard to keep track of everything.

Then why not just answer the question? You seem very adept at applying the rule of man to the point of incest which, given is correct, but your delivery is in no way a help.

Where in the bible - be specific - chapter and verse - does it say that you should have a right to picket the funerals of servicemen and behave in the way your church does?

Also, you mentioned assumption as to the organisation - your screen-name is enough of a reason, if you are not, then clearly state your position

 

[LordOfHell]

I think that that is a disingenuous argument which is miles away from the very close familial relationships that are often advocated there with all of the hugely complicated dynamics involved

if you're trying to get me to say...ah well, but that's different...then bravo! You've won-it is indeed very different-and you know it

Bear with me a sec, and please be assured that nothing I'm saying is meant as a personal attack against you. (You've seemed to take offense to a lot of what I've said, when that was not my intent.)

In debating, you cannot use the most extreme example of an argument as a representative of the entire argument. If your argument is that "incest can be good", it cannot be taken by the other that your argument is instead "ALL incest is good". That is called a "strawman fallacy".

In this case, I am aware that NOT all incest is good. However, I'm also aware that not all of it is bad. I ABHOR . . . absolutely LOATHE . . . any form of sexual activity that destroys lives, whether it be pedophilia, rape, incest, cheating, spreading disease . . . you name it. To me, it's all equally deplorable.

However, I think that every single person should have the right to explore their own sexual identity in a secure and intelligent manner. Not everyone will succeed, but everyone should have the right. Thus, I asked if it wer bad if two people who fall in love but happen to be related. If you believe that it is not bad, then we're getting somewhere. It means it's not incest in itself you find bad, but the incest which is done carelessly or maliciously, and I fully agree.

 

[Golden_Silence]

iggy iggy iggy!



is that cunt still bleating?

who gives a rodent's rectum?

now, the sun's out, who's coming to skeggy?

What I wanna know is:

Has it taken you all this time to free yourself from the velux???

 

[CaliGuy60]

Pics...just sayin'

Actually I do have a video, I will pm you a link

 

[janeyl]

can I go to YOUR room? I'm sure it's much more interesting.....

He he...darling, you have NO idea...

 

[WboroBaptM0134]

Then why not just answer the question? You seem very adept at applying the rule of man to the point of incest which, given is correct, but your delivery is in no way a help.

Where in the bible - be specific - chapter and verse - does it say that you should have a right to picket the funerals of servicemen and behave in the way your church does?

Also, you mentioned assumption as to the organisation - your screen-name is enough of a reason, if you are not, then clearly state your position

We'll talk about this later... stick to this conversation now at this moment.

 

[Golden_Silence]

In debating, you cannot use the most extreme example of an argument as a representative of the entire argument. If your argument is that "incest can be good", it cannot be taken by the other that your argument is instead "ALL incest is good". That is called a "strawman fallacy".

Dude, I hate to stick in here - But, Janeyl is not the kind of person that you need to explain this kind of concept to - trust me this one