Blurting it out....Playground style

[Golden_Silence]

If you're going to speak violently and insultingly to me I won't respond.

You can phrase your points clearly and in an organized manner, and I'll respond.

Violently? where in that post did I make a threat veiled or otherwise? I think I clearly made my point. That is, you are not a voice that warrants listening to on the subject of incest.

And, now here you are now clearly avoiding the issue I raised about your cult and its activities.

I reiterate.

Where in the bible does it state in any form that you should show up at a servicemans funeral and shout your disapproval and in doing so, dishonour the person who died and their grieving family?

 

[Wings27]

I am not superior nor do I think I am. I just fight my battles where they should be fought.

 

[Golden_Silence]

Oh you're so superior aren't you?

In comparison to you? Yes, yes she is, the lady is no dumb puppy, what you see on the outside is a person enjoying herself, inside she is a lot smarter than you will ever be

 

[CaliGuy60]

No you've picked and chosen.

I've explained all ready why some forms of porn can be inherently wrong.

I am anti censorship in general

However I am for the government protecting its citizens from malicious and indecent material.

Non consent and child porn can never be justified because it violates the rights of the individuals involved.

Non-consent and child porn literature cannot be justified because it obfuscates the reality of the issue without artistic purpose, as such, it is malicious material, and damages the moral sense of those who take pleasure from it.

Right then. But you are not coherent, and you are not taking the trouble to justify why you have your views in the sense of reducing harmful things in society. But this is certainly expected from someone who belongs to your very misguided organization who worships an imaginary friend and believes in persecuting perfectly good humans for irrational reasons. You are good at big words and repeating the same things over and over again. But you are not good at making sense.

I took the few minutes to dialog with you in the hopes that maybe there was something rational about what you were saying. Sadly (but consistently) my hopes were dashed.

I think we do agree on the point that things should not be censored, and we agree that there should not be child abuse. But that's as far as it goes for me.

I predict that history will look very poorly on you and your church.

 

[WboroBaptM0134]

Then, do you have a problem with porn which depicts ANY form of unprotected sex with strangers? Combined, unwanted pregnancy and sexually-transmitted diseases have destroyed more lives than either of those two.
.

Why would you conclude that from what i said?

 

[LordOfHell]

Your comparisons bear no relation.

I can find no relation between finding the male form beautiful and getting off to fantasies about forced incest. None whatsoever.

And yes you should be the judge of material, but society at the same time should be protected from it if it is generally considered to be malicious.

You stated that the reason you want these things censored is because they misrepresent the actual issues they address. Non-consent fantasy does not address the horror of rape, etc.

So what of "male beauty"? Michaelangelo only shows what he believes to be beautiful; the best-case scenario, as it were. He doesn't draw or sculpt any man with a bear belly, a hunchback, or webbed toes. And in the modern day, unhealthy self-images are considered to be a pretty large factor in depression.

So, to compare: what would be the problem in writing a story which depicts ONE best-case scenario for a relationship that I find kinky or beautiful? It wouldn't mean that I find ALL non-consent or incest beautiful, but why should I not be allowed to write about that which I do anymore than Michaelangelo is allowed to sculpt only what he finds attractive?

 

[DarkSimian]

remember when this thread was about boobs?

 

[CaliGuy60]

I am not superior nor do I think I am. I just fight my battles where they should be fought.

Yup. I found this to be an interesting little diversion for me to gain some insight into WBC. It confirmed my feelings, so in that way it was useful to me.

 

[CaliGuy60]

remember when this thread was about boobs?

It's always about boobies, any time day or night. Boobies and booby talk is always welcome here.

 

[WboroBaptM0134]

Violently? where in that post did I make a threat veiled or otherwise? I think I clearly made my point. That is, you are not a voice that warrants listening to on the subject of incest.

And, now here you are now clearly avoiding the issue I raised about your cult and its activities.

I reiterate.

Where in the bible does it state in any form that you should show up at a servicemans funeral and shout your disapproval and in doing so, dishonour the person who died and their grieving family?

Reread it.

 

[LordOfHell]

Why would you conclude that from what i said?

Because you argued that writing porn about taboo subjects is demeaning the trauma those subjects can cause to real-life victims.

Thus, something proven to be as unwise as unprotected sex with strangers must be equally bannable and ripe for censorship, correct?

 

[DarkSimian]

It's always about boobies, any time day or night. Boobies and booby talk is always welcome here.

Finally! Someone that talks some sense!

 

[Golden_Silence]

Reread it.

Hmmm, you are avoiding the question, funny, as you seem to like raising and being obnoxious..

Again, for the third time, I reiterate.

Where in the bible does it state in any form that you should show up at a servicemans funeral and shout your disapproval and in doing so, dishonour the person who died and their grieving family?

 

[WboroBaptM0134]

Right then. But you are not coherent, and you are not taking the trouble to justify why you have your views in the sense of reducing harmful things in society. But this is certainly expected from someone who belongs to your very misguided organization who worships an imaginary friend and believes in persecuting perfectly good humans for irrational reasons. You are good at big words and repeating the same things over and over again. But you are not good at making sense.

I took the few minutes to dialog with you in the hopes that maybe there was something rational about what you were saying. Sadly (but consistently) my hopes were dashed.

I think we do agree on the point that things should not be censored, and we agree that there should not be child abuse. But that's as far as it goes for me.

I predict that history will look very poorly on you and your church.

Explain my incoherence. What exactly about what I said, makes no sense? And be careful that you really quote what I say.

Its not good enough just to sit there on your high horse and castigate me because of my assumed organization.

 

[WboroBaptM0134]

Hmmm, you are avoiding the question, funny, as you seem to like raising and being obnoxious..

Again, for the third time, I reiterate.

Where in the bible does it state in any form that you should show up at a servicemans funeral and shout your disapproval and in doing so, dishonour the person who died and their grieving family?

We are not discussing this issue, we are discussing incest.

 

[Mrs.H]

remember when this thread was about boobs?

Is there really an ugly part of Texas?

 

[Golden_Silence]

Explain my incoherence. What exactly about what I said, makes no sense? And be careful that you really quote what I say.

Its not good enough just to sit there on your high horse and castigate me because of my assumed organization.

Where in the bible does it state in any form that you should show up at a servicemans funeral and shout your disapproval and in doing so, dishonour the person who died and their grieving family?

 

[CaliGuy60]

Is there really an ugly part of Texas?

I think there are lots of them, if memory serves.

 

[DarkSimian]

To quote Groucho Marx, "I would never join any group that would have me as a member."

 

[Golden_Silence]

We are not discussing this issue, we are discussing incest.

No, You are, I am asking the question which, you appear to have either overlooked, or choose to not answer.

Again:

Where in the bible does it state in any form that you should show up at a servicemans funeral and shout your disapproval and in doing so, dishonour the person who died and their grieving family?

 

[WboroBaptM0134]

Because you argued that writing porn about taboo subjects is demeaning the trauma those subjects can cause to real-life victims.

Thus, something proven to be as unwise as unprotected sex with strangers must be equally bannable and ripe for censorship, correct?

Incorrect. That last statement does not follow from the first.

Having unprotected sex is not an immoral thing to do.

 

[WboroBaptM0134]

No, You are, I am asking the question which, you appear to have either overlooked, or choose to not answer.

Again:

Where in the bible does it state in any form that you should show up at a servicemans funeral and shout your disapproval and in doing so, dishonour the person who died and their grieving family?

We've talked about this before, and I'm not going to pay attention to assumptions on your part.

 

[DarkSimian]

Is there really an ugly part of Texas?

if you keep going west or southwest from where I'm at....it's pretty desolate. miles and miles of nothing could be considered fugly

 

[LordOfHell]

Incorrect. That last statement does not follow from the first.

Having unprotected sex is not an immoral thing to do.

That's your opinion. There are plenty of religious denominations that disagree.

I'd also argue that incest between consenting and loving adults is also not immoral.

 

[CaliGuy60]

This has been fun, but I think I'm going to masturbate now.