Birthright Citizenship Challenge

I did not see this EO, even though i.expected it. The ACLU filed a lawsuit immediately.

The 14th amendment will be upheld and this EO will be overturned.

ACLU files lawsuit against Trump order to end birthright citizenship https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...thright-citizenship-aclu-lawsuit/77844980007/
18 state attorneys generals have signed on to this lawsuit on behalf of the 14th Amendment.

The Trump White House has responded in a petty manner befitting the current White House thin-skinned occupant;

They have removed the searchable text version of the United States Constitution from WhiteHouse.gov.
 
Buh bye anchor babies.
I wonder if BotanyBoy will have wifi access once his anchor baby citizenship is revoked and he is repatriated to his North Korean homeland? I daresay he won't survive long if his American welfare stipend is revoked.
 
I answered you, dipshit. You're the one who believes the amendment has qualifiers. The amendment isn't enforced as such.
There hasn't been a ruling on the matter since the case I brought to your attention.
 
There is hardly anyone in the country who can go back three generations and not encounter an immigrant element.

Including the Sex Offender In Chief.
 
There hasn't been a ruling on the matter since the case I brought to your attention.
I know that. You believe the horseshit.you've been fed in your echo chamber.

The 14th amendment is clear and is not aligned with your horseshit
 
But not birthright citizenship as it is understood by you.
By all means then, please explain your position.
I know you said you've addressed this before, I couldn't find any evidence of that
If you like, just link us to your previously stated position "complete with cites" as you say.
 
The phrase that will be subject to debate is; "AND subject to the jurisdiction thereof".

Considering the make up of the current court there is no better time to have this debate.
 
*chuckles*
The fact that his parents were legal residents of the U.S. gave the Court a significant basis for applying the 14th Amendment's jurisdictional clause to Wong's case. Their legal residency meant that they were subject to U.S. jurisdiction, which was a key argument in the decision to grant their son citizenship, as Wong was born on U.S. soil.
It wasn't that his parents were legal residents. It was that they had a "domicile" and were working, and a whole bunch of other reasons. But they were not American citizens. They were Chinese from the Chinese Empire and subjects of the Emperor.

No surprise here that you're still as fucking dumb as you were....
 
18 state attorneys generals have signed on to this lawsuit on behalf of the 14th Amendment.

The Trump White House has responded in a petty manner befitting the current White House thin-skinned occupant;

They have removed the searchable text version of the United States Constitution from WhiteHouse.gov.
Don't they realize there's a complete copy of the Constitution in every high school U.S. history textbook?!
 
Bill Barr agrees with Trump, there is an argument to be made.
No surprise.

Barr is also infamous for his advocating the "unitary executive theory," which calls for a massive expansion of executive power.[4] Barr could be called pro-authoritarian on that basis alone, but he additionally asked Congress in March 2020 to grant the Justice Department to ask judges to detain people indefinitely without trial. In June, Barr fired Geoffrey Berman, the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Berman had been prosecuting Trump cronies, including his personal lawyers Michael Cohen and Rudolph Giuliani. It was obvious that Barr was attempting to neutralize the prosecution of any crimes within the Trump Organization.[5]:87
 
Back
Top